Literature DB >> 17395106

Current status of transport-disc-distraction osteogenesis for mandibular reconstruction.

Assuntina G Sacco1, Douglas B Chepeha.   

Abstract

Surgical intervention including composite mandibulectomy is the mainstay of treatment for extrication of disease in patients with neoplasms involving the mandible. The associated morbidities and reduction in quality of life after reconstruction of the mandibular defect are dependent on the quality of the reconstruction. Therefore, alternative treatments, such as distraction osteogenesis, could be a viable option to improve patient outcome. The goal of this technology is to restore bony continuity through the use of in-situ bone in an attempt to create an anatomically correct regenerate that is better than bone grafting or revascularised free-tissue transfer. Distraction osteogenesis involves a three-step process in which bone adjacent to the defect is osteotomised and gradually opened (distracted) with the aid of a mechanical device, followed by formation of new bone with subsequent consolidation. Previous work has shown encouraging results regarding the translation of distraction osteogenesis technology from an animal model to human application, with particular success in the unradiated setting. The major challenge surrounding the use of this technology in head and neck oncological reconstruction will be the effect of radiotherapy on the regenerate bone in patients who have previously received or will need radiotherapy as part of their treatment. Although distraction osteogenesis provides an attractive alternative for reconstruction of mandibular defects, large studies of human populations are needed to further assess the use of this technology and its role in the treatment framework for mandibular neoplasms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17395106     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70102-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  11 in total

1.  Dentate transport discs can be used to reconstruct large segmental mandibular defects.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; Veera Malavia; Ibrahim Zakhary; Timothy Mulone; Elias D Kontogiorgos; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 1.895

2.  Transport distraction osteogenesis for maxillomandibular reconstruction: current concepts and applications.

Authors:  R S Neelakandan; Darpan Bhargava
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2011-12-29

Review 3.  Biomechanical configurations of mandibular transport distraction osteogenesis devices.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 6.389

4.  Experience with mandibular reconstruction using transport-disc-distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lorena Pingarrón-Martín; T González Otero; L J Arias Gallo
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-11-18

5.  Biomechanical characteristics of regenerated cortical bone in the canine mandible.

Authors:  Uriel Zapata; Lynne A Opperman; Elias Kontogiorgos; Mohammed E Elsalanty; Paul C Dechow
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 3.963

6.  Reconstruction of canine mandibular bone defects using a bone transport reconstruction plate.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; Ibrahim Zakhary; Sara Akeel; Byron Benson; Timothy Mulone; Gilbert R Triplett; Lynne A Opperman
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.539

7.  Role of parathyroid hormone therapy in reversing radiation-induced nonunion and normalization of radiomorphometrics in a murine mandibular model of distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  K Kelly Gallagher; Sagar Deshpande; Catherine N Tchanque-Fossuo; Alexis Donneys; Deniz Sarhaddi; Noah S Nelson; Douglas B Chepeha; Steven R Buchman
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.147

8.  Segmental Mandibular Reconstruction Using Tissue Engineering Strategies: A Systematic Review of Individual Patient Data.

Authors:  Vinay V Kumar; Elke Rometsch; Andreas Thor; Eppo Wolvius; Anahí Hurtado-Chong
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2020-04-08

9.  Lateral transport osteogenesis in maxillofacial oncology patients for rehabilitation with dental implants: a retrospective case series.

Authors:  Arturo Bilbao-Alonso; José-María García-Rielo; Pablo Varela-Centelles; Juan Seoane
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-01-01

10.  Evaluation of inferior alveolar nerve regeneration by bifocal distraction osteogenesis with retrograde transportation of horseradish peroxidase in dogs.

Authors:  Yosuke Shogen; Emiko Tanaka Isomura; Mikihiko Kogo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.