Burak Turan1, Ayhan Erkol1, Mehmet Gül2, Uğur Fındıkçıoğlu3, İsmail Erden1. 1. Cardiology Department, Kocaeli Derince Training and Research Hospital, Kocaeli, Istanbul, Turkey. 2. Cardiology Department, Mehmet Akif Ersoy Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey. 3. Cardiology Department, Dr. Lütfi Kırdar Kartal Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has been traditionally associated with increased mortality and adverse cardiovascular events. We sought to determine whether CIN has a negative impact on the long-term outcome of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: A total of 312 consecutive patients (mean age 59 years, 76% male) who presented with NSTEMI and had undergone an early invasive procedure were retrospectively included. CIN was defined as either a 25% or 0.5-mg/dl increase in baseline serum creatinine (Cr) 72 h after the procedure. The primary endpoint of the study was mortality in the long-term follow-up (38 months, interquartile range 30-40). The secondary endpoint consisted of mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: CIN developed in 30 (9.6%) patients. Independent predictors of CIN were the contrast volume-to-Cr clearance ratio, left ventricular ejection fraction and hemoglobin concentration. The primary (20 vs. 8.5%, p = 0.042) and secondary endpoints (33.3 vs. 17%, p = 0.029) were observed more frequently in patients with CIN during long-term follow-up. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of CIN was 2.55 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.04-6.24, p = 0.040] for mortality and 2.15 (CI 1.09-4.25, p = 0.028) for mortality/MI. However, after adjustment for confounding factors, CIN was not an independent predictor of either mortality (OR 1.62, CI 0.21-12.57, p = 0.646) or mortality/MI (OR 1.12, CI 0.31-4.0, p = 0.860). CONCLUSION: The effect of CIN on the long-term outcome of patients with NSTEMI was substantially influenced by confounding factors. CIN was a marker, rather than a mediator, of increased cardiovascular risk, and the baseline renal function was more conclusive as a long-term prognosticator.
BACKGROUND: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) has been traditionally associated with increased mortality and adverse cardiovascular events. We sought to determine whether CIN has a negative impact on the long-term outcome of patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: A total of 312 consecutive patients (mean age 59 years, 76% male) who presented with NSTEMI and had undergone an early invasive procedure were retrospectively included. CIN was defined as either a 25% or 0.5-mg/dl increase in baseline serum creatinine (Cr) 72 h after the procedure. The primary endpoint of the study was mortality in the long-term follow-up (38 months, interquartile range 30-40). The secondary endpoint consisted of mortality and myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS:CIN developed in 30 (9.6%) patients. Independent predictors of CIN were the contrast volume-to-Cr clearance ratio, left ventricular ejection fraction and hemoglobin concentration. The primary (20 vs. 8.5%, p = 0.042) and secondary endpoints (33.3 vs. 17%, p = 0.029) were observed more frequently in patients with CIN during long-term follow-up. The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of CIN was 2.55 [95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.04-6.24, p = 0.040] for mortality and 2.15 (CI 1.09-4.25, p = 0.028) for mortality/MI. However, after adjustment for confounding factors, CIN was not an independent predictor of either mortality (OR 1.62, CI 0.21-12.57, p = 0.646) or mortality/MI (OR 1.12, CI 0.31-4.0, p = 0.860). CONCLUSION: The effect of CIN on the long-term outcome of patients with NSTEMI was substantially influenced by confounding factors. CIN was a marker, rather than a mediator, of increased cardiovascular risk, and the baseline renal function was more conclusive as a long-term prognosticator.
Authors: George Dangas; Ioannis Iakovou; Eugenia Nikolsky; Eve D Aymong; Gary S Mintz; Nicholas N Kipshidze; Alexandra J Lansky; Issam Moussa; Gregg W Stone; Jeffrey W Moses; Martin B Leon; Roxana Mehran Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2005-01-01 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Charanjit S Rihal; Stephen C Textor; Diane E Grill; Peter B Berger; Henry H Ting; Patricia J Best; Mandeep Singh; Malcolm R Bell; Gregory W Barsness; Verghese Mathew; Kirk N Garratt; David R Holmes Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-05-14 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Matthew T James; Susan M Samuel; Megan A Manning; Marcello Tonelli; William A Ghali; Peter Faris; Merril L Knudtson; Neesh Pannu; Brenda R Hemmelgarn Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2013-01-15 Impact factor: 6.546
Authors: Jin H Han; Abhinav Chandra; Jyotsna Mulgund; Matthew T Roe; Eric D Peterson; Lynda A Szczech; Uptal Patel; E Magnus Ohman; Christopher J Lindsell; W Brian Gibler Journal: Am J Med Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Richard J Solomon; Roxana Mehran; Madhu K Natarajan; Serge Doucet; Richard E Katholi; Cezar S Staniloae; Samin K Sharma; Marino Labinaz; Joseph L Gelormini; Brendan J Barrett Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2009-06-25 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Edwin A Takahashi; David F Kallmes; Kristin C Mara; William S Harmsen; Sanjay Misra Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2018-11 Impact factor: 2.630