Literature DB >> 17953923

[Contrast-induced nephropathy and acute renal failure following emergent cardiac catheterization: incidence, risk factors and prognosis].

Alberto Bouzas-Mosquera1, José Manuel Vázquez-Rodríguez, Ramón Calviño-Santos, Jesús Peteiro-Vázquez, Xacobe Flores-Ríos, Raquel Marzoa-Rivas, Pablo Piñón-Esteban, Guillermo Aldama-López, Jorge Salgado-Fernández, Nicolás Vázquez-González, Alfonso Castro-Beiras.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to investigate the incidence and prognosis of, and predictive factors for, acute renal failure following emergent cardiac catheterization.
METHODS: The study involved 602 consecutive patients who underwent emergent cardiac catheterization. Acute renal failure (ARF) was defined as an increase in serum creatinine level > or =0.5 mg/dL within 72 hours following the procedure. Predictive factors for and the prognosis of ARF were evaluated in an initial cohort of 315 patients, and a risk score was derived. The risk score was validated in a second cohort of 287 patients. The median (interquartile) follow-up time was 1.3 years (0.8-2.0 years).
RESULTS: Seventy-two of the 602 patients (12.0%) developed ARF. In the initial cohort of 315 patients, the following factors were predictors of ARF: cardiogenic shock at admission (odds ratio [OR] 4.56), diabetes mellitus (OR 2.98), time to reperfusion >6 hours (OR 3.18), anterior myocardial infarction (OR 2.61), baseline serum creatinine level > or =1.5 mg/dL (OR 3.51), and baseline serum urea level > or =50 mg/dL (OR 3.00). A risk score based on these variables was constructed in which cardiogenic shock = 3 points and each of the remaining variables = 2 points. Patients in the validation cohort were divided into five risk categories: in those with 0 points, the incidence of ARF was 1.2%; with 2-3 points, 8.7%; with 4-5 points, 12.5%; with 6-7 points, 46.2%; and with > or =8 points, 66.7% (P< .0001). Cox regression analysis showed that ARF was a powerful predictor of total mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 5.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.54-14.03; P< .0001) and of a major cardiovascular event (HR 3.29, 95% CI 1.61-6.75; P=.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of ARF after emergent cardiac catheterization is high. Cardiogenic shock, diabetes mellitus, myocardial infarction location, time to reperfusion, and serum creatinine and urea levels are predictors of ARF. Patients who developed this complication had higher mortality and major cardiovascular events rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17953923     DOI: 10.1157/13111234

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol        ISSN: 0300-8932            Impact factor:   4.753


  10 in total

1.  Effect of Contrast-Induced Nephropathy on the Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Burak Turan; Ayhan Erkol; Mehmet Gül; Uğur Fındıkçıoğlu; İsmail Erden
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 2.041

2.  Clinical prediction scores for type 1 cardiorenal syndrome derived and validated in chinese cohorts.

Authors:  Hong Cheng; Yi-Pu Chen
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.041

3.  Simple pre-procedure risk stratification tool for contrast-induced nephropathy.

Authors:  Zhonghan Ni; Yan Liang; Nianjin Xie; Jin Liu; Guoli Sun; Shiqun Chen; Jianfeng Ye; Yibo He; Wei Guo; Ning Tan; Jiyan Chen; Yong Liu; Zhujun Chen; Shouhong Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  [Contrast induced nephropathy].

Authors:  Walter H Hörl
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 1.704

5.  A comparison of sodium bicarbonate infusion versus normal saline infusion and its combination with oral acetazolamide for prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy: a randomized, double-blind trial.

Authors:  Maryam Pakfetrat; Mohammad Hossein Nikoo; Leila Malekmakan; Mahmood Tabandeh; Jamshid Roozbeh; Mahshid Hashemi Nasab; Mohammad Ali Ostovan; Soheila Salari; Mohammad Kafi; Najmeh Moin Vaziri; Farzad Adl; Mehdi Hosseini; Parviz Khajehdehi
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-01-10       Impact factor: 2.370

6.  Derivation and validation of a risk score for contrast-induced nephropathy after cardiac catheterization in Chinese patients.

Authors:  Yu-mei Gao; Di Li; Hong Cheng; Yi-pu Chen
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2014-02-11       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Risk factors for contrast induced nephropathy: a study among Italian patients.

Authors:  Salvatore Evola; Monica Lunetta; Francesca Macaione; Giuseppe Fonte; Gaspare Milana; Egle Corrado; Francesca Bonura; Giuseppina Novo; Enrico Hoffmann; Salvatore Novo
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2012-07-27

8.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic total occlusion improved prognosis in patients with renal insufficiency at high risk of contrast-induced nephropathy.

Authors:  Yong Liu; Yuanhui Liu; Hualong Li; Yingling Zhou; Wei Guo; Chongyang Duan; Shiqun Chen; Pingyan Chen; Ning Tan; Jiyan Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Sodium bicarbonate versus isotonic saline solution to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy : a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carlos Andres Zapata-Chica; Diana Bello Marquez; Lina Maria Serna-Higuita; John Fredy Nieto-Ríos; Fabian David Casas-Arroyave; Jorge Hernando Donado-Gómez
Journal:  Colomb Med (Cali)       Date:  2015-09-30

10.  Nephroprotective Effects of L-Carnitine against Contrast-Induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Open-Labeled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Mohammadi; Azita Hajhossein Talasaz; Mohammad Alidoosti; Hamid Reza Pour Hosseini; Kheirollah Gholami; Arash Jalali; Hamid Aryannejad
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2017-04
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.