Literature DB >> 15619387

Contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary interventions in relation to chronic kidney disease and hemodynamic variables.

George Dangas1, Ioannis Iakovou, Eugenia Nikolsky, Eve D Aymong, Gary S Mintz, Nicholas N Kipshidze, Alexandra J Lansky, Issam Moussa, Gregg W Stone, Jeffrey W Moses, Martin B Leon, Roxana Mehran.   

Abstract

We previously found that contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) complicating percutaneous coronary intervention adversely affects patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Therefore, we further investigated whether the predictors and outcome of CIN after percutaneous coronary intervention differ among patients with versus without CKD. Among 7,230 consecutive patients, CIN (>or=25% or >or=0.5 mg/dl increase in preprocedure serum creatinine 48 hours after the procedure) developed in 381 of 1,980 patients (19.2%) with baseline CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) and in 688 of 5,250 patients (13.1%) without CKD. Decreased eGFRs, periprocedural hypotension, higher contrast media volumes, lower baseline hematocrit, diabetes, pulmonary edema at presentation, intra-aortic balloon pump use, and ejection fraction <40% were the most significant predictors of CIN in patients with CKD. Apart from intra-aortic balloon pump use, predictors of CIN in patients without CKD were the same as mentioned, plus older age and type of contrast media. Regardless of baseline renal function, CIN correlated with longer in-hospital stay and higher rates of in-hospital complications and 1-year mortality compared with patients without CIN. By multivariate analysis, CIN was 1 of the most powerful predictors of 1-year mortality in patients with preexisting CKD (odds ratio 2.37, 95% confidence interval 1.63 to 3.44) or preserved eGFR (odds ratio 1.78; 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 2.60). Thus, regardless of the presence of CKD, baseline characteristics and periprocedural hemodynamic parameters predict CIN, and this complication is associated with worse in-hospital and 1-year outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15619387     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.08.056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  134 in total

1.  Effects of Intra-Arterial and Intravenous Iso-Osmolar Contrast Medium (Iodixanol) on the Risk of Contrast-Induced Acute Kidney Injury: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Peter A McCullough; Jeremiah R Brown
Journal:  Cardiorenal Med       Date:  2011-10-04       Impact factor: 2.041

2.  Characteristics and in-hospital outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and chronic kidney disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Elias B Hanna; Anita Y Chen; Matthew T Roe; Stephen D Wiviott; Caroline S Fox; Jorge F Saucedo
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 11.195

3.  Use and efficacy of saline hydration and N-acetyl cysteine to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy in low-risk populations undergoing coronary artery angiography.

Authors:  Paolo Calabrò; Renatomaria Bianchi; Mario Crisci; Mario Caprile; Maurizio Cappelli Bigazzi; Rosalinda Palmieri; Enrica Golia; Anna De Vita; Ilaria Jane Romano; Giuseppe Limongelli; Maria Giovanna Russo; Raffaele Calabrò
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2011-01-29       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Epidemiology of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in ICU patients: a retrospective cohort analysis.

Authors:  Eric A J Hoste; Severine Doom; Jan De Waele; Louke J Delrue; Luc Defreyne; Dominique D Benoit; Johan Decruyenaere
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Questionnaires for examinations using iodinated contrast media and their grades of recommendation: Japan Radiological Society/Japanese College of Radiology Joint Committee on Contrast Media Safety.

Authors:  Hiromitsu Hayashi; Yoshifumi Narumi; Ryo Takagi; Yasuo Takehara; Yasuaki Arai; Ryohei Kuwatsuru; Yukunori Korogi; Hideharu Sugimoto; Yoshito Tsushima; Katsumi Hayakawa; Kunihiko Fukuda; Shozo Tamura; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 6.  Cardiorenal syndrome: still not a defined entity.

Authors:  Carlo Longhini; Christian Molino; Fabio Fabbian
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-20       Impact factor: 2.801

7.  Prognostic value of different laboratory measures of renal function for long-term mortality after contrast media-associated renal impairment.

Authors:  Christine Heitmeyer; Birgit Hölscher; Manfred Fobker; Günter Breithardt; Martin Hausberg; Holger Reinecke
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 2.882

8.  Iodinated contrast media cause direct tubular cell damage, leading to oxidative stress, low nitric oxide, and impairment of tubuloglomerular feedback.

Authors:  Zhi Zhao Liu; Kristin Schmerbach; Yuan Lu; Andrea Perlewitz; Tatiana Nikitina; Kathleen Cantow; Erdmann Seeliger; Pontus B Persson; Andreas Patzak; Ruisheng Liu; Mauricio M Sendeski
Journal:  Am J Physiol Renal Physiol       Date:  2014-01-15

9.  Preventing contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with baseline renal dysfunction undergoing coronary angiography.

Authors:  Po-Tsang Lee; Kang-Ju Chou; Hua-Chang Fang
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2009-02

Review 10.  [Iodinated contrast agent-induced nephropathy].

Authors:  C Erley
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.