| Literature DB >> 25999682 |
Carmen Galbis-Estrada1, Maria Dolores Pinazo-Durán2, Sebastián Martínez-Castillo3, José M Morales4, Daniel Monleón5, Vicente Zanon-Moreno6.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We used nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of hydrogen-1 nuclei ((1)H NMR S) to analyze the metabolic profile of reflex tears from patients with dry eye disorders.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25999682 PMCID: PMC4431415
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Inclusion and exclusion criteria.
| Age 25–80 years | Aged <25 years or >80 years |
| Diagnosed with DES (DESG)
| Atopy and allergic disorders |
| Healthy subjects (CG) | Wearing contact lenses |
| Presence of DES symptoms | History of refractive surgery, ophthalmic laser treatment (<3 months) |
| Able to participate in the study | Systemic diseases and general treatments |
| Informed consent | Patients presenting with
intermittent ocular surface signs and symptoms. |
| | Ocular disorders and eye drops other than artificial tears |
| Not able to participate in the study |
DESG: Dry Eye Syndrome Group; CG: Control Group
Figure 1Schematic workflow for the study design.
Figure 2Schematic workflow for the metabolomic procedures.
Clinical probes for dry eye disease diagnosis and managing.
| 9.8 (1.7) | 11.4 (0.5) | 7.5 (0.8) | 8.1 (0.3) | 1.9 (0.3) | 1.3 (0.1) | |||||
| 9.5 (9.9) | 13.3 (4.1) | 5.9 (0.6) | 6.9 (0.0) | 2.8 (0.5) | 1.8 (0.3) | |||||
| 18.9 (5.5) | 25.1 (0.8) | 7.9 (0.1) | 8.4 (0.0) | 0.1 (0.0) | 0.0 (0.0) | 0.214 | ||||
DESG: dry eye syndrome group; CG: control group; BUT: breakup time test; BS: before supplementation; AS: after supplementation; SD: standard deviation # Subjective Sensations related to dry eyes (dryness, irritation, grittiness, foreign body feelings, light sensitivity, tired eyes, vision fluctuation and/or blurred vision) were classified considering both eyes (ranking from 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=very severe) * significant p value (<0.05) ** significant p value (<0.001)
Metabolites present in mild-DESG and moderate-DESG tears prior/after to supplementation.
| -CH3 lipids | 0.0263
(0.005) | 0.0233
(0.007) | 0.007** | 0.0208
(0.007) | 0.019
(0.006) | 0.47 | |
| Cholesterol/lipids | 0.025
(0.004) | 0.021
(0.006) | 0.01** | 0.021
(0.005) | 0.018
(0.007) | 0.11 | |
| N-acetylglucosamine | 0.077
(0.01) | 0.059
(0.02) | 0.004** | 0.063
(0.02) | 0.055
(0.02) | 0.25 | |
| Glutamate | 0.031
(0.002) | 0.027
(0.004) | 0.02** | 0.028
(0.005) | 0.027
(0.005) | 0.44 | |
| Amino-n-butyrate | 0.0141
(0.001) | 0.0142
(0.002) | 0.04** | 0.017
(0.005) | 0.014
(0.003) | 0.21 | |
| Choline/acetylcholine | 0.010
(0.003) | 0.010
(0.003) | 0.9 | 0.011
(0.002) | 0.009
(0.002) | 0.03** | |
| Choline | 0.004
(0.001) | 0.005
(0.002) | 0.02** | 0.005
(0.002) | 0.006
(0.002) | 0.61 | |
| Lactate | 0.0064
(0.002) | 0.0078
(0.003) | 0.11 | 0.008
(0.003) | 0.009
(0.004) | 0.81 | |
| Glucose | 0.0084
(0.005) | 0.015
(0.009) | 0.007** | 0.019
(0.01) | 0.023
(0.01) | 0.48 | |
| Phenylalanine | 0.028
(0.004) | 0.034
(0.006) | 0.08 | 0.031
(0.003) | 0.034
(0.01) | 0.54 | |
| Formate | 0.0018 (0.0008) | 0.003 (0.001) | 0.02** | 0.003 (0.0009) | 0.003 (0.002) | 0.50 | |
DESG: dry eye syndrome group * p value after adjusting by age and gender; ** significant p value (<0.05).
Figure 3Average spectrum representation of the dry eye syndrome group tears compared to that of the control group before treatment.
Figure 4Improvement in subjective symptoms in patients with dry eyes after the oral nutraceutic supplementation.
Figure 5Scores diagram of partial least-squares discriminate analysis of the dry eye syndrome group (green) and the control group (red) before supplementation (A) and after supplementation (B).
Figure 6Load diagram model of partial least-squares discriminate analysis differentiating between mild dry eyes (orange) and moderate dry eyes (blue) before supplementation (A) and after supplementation (B).