Literature DB >> 16329048

The triple classification of dry eye for practical clinical use.

J Murube1, J Németh, H Höh, P Kaynak-Hekimhan, J Horwath-Winter, A Agarwal, C Baudouin, J M Benítez del Castillo, S Cervenka, L ChenZhuo, A Ducasse, J Durán, F Holly, R Javate, J Nepp, F Paulsen, A Rahimi, P Raus, O Shalaby, P Sieg, H Soriano, D Spinelli, S H Ugurbas, G Van Setten.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: "Dry Eye is a condition produced by the inadequate interrelation between lacrimal film and ocular surface epithelium, and is caused by quantitative and qualitative deficits in one or both of them. It can be produced by one or combined etiologic causes, affecting one or several of the secretions of the glands serving the ocular surface, and producing secondary manifestations of different grades of severity". Clinicians need a practical classification to face diagnosis, prognosis and treatment. Dry eyes have many etiologies and pathogenesis, different affectation of the various dacryoglands and ocular surface epithelium, and diverse grades of severity. The specialists in xero-dacryology must know these three parameters to evaluate any case of dry eye, and to establish an adequate treatment.
METHODS: To facilitate this, an open session in the 8th congress of the International Society of Dacryology and Dry Eye (Madrid, April, 2005) proposed modifying the Triple Classification of dry eye approved in the XIV congress of the European Society of Ophthalmology (Madrid, June, 2003). There was consensus of all conclusions.
CONCLUSIONS: The following classification has been established: First, a classification of the etio-pathogenesis, distributed in ten groups: age-related, hormonal, pharmacologic, immunopathic, hyponutritional, dysgenic, infectious/inflammatory, traumatic, neurologic and tantalic. Second, a classification of the affected glands and tissues, which under the acronym of ALMEN includes the Aqueo-serousdeficient, Lipodeficient, Mucindeficient and Epitheliopatic dry eyes, and the Non dacryological affected exocrine glands (saliva, nasal secretion, tracheo-pharyngeal secretion, etc). And thirdly, a classification of severity, in three grades: Grade 1 or mild (symptoms without slitlamp signs), grade 2 or moderate (symptoms with reversible signs), and grade 3 or severe (symptoms with permanent signs).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16329048     DOI: 10.1177/112067210501500602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   1.922


  9 in total

1.  Comparative portrayal of ocular surface microbe with and without dry eye.

Authors:  ZhenHao Li; Yufang Gong; ShuZe Chen; SiQi Li; Yu Zhang; HuiMin Zhong; ZhouCheng Wang; YiFan Chen; QiXin Deng; YuTing Jiang; LiYing Li; Min Fu; GuoGuo Yi
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 3.422

2.  [Psychosomatic aspects of dry eye syndrome].

Authors:  J Nepp
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  A metabolomic approach to dry eye disorders. The role of oral supplements with antioxidants and omega 3 fatty acids.

Authors:  Carmen Galbis-Estrada; Maria Dolores Pinazo-Durán; Sebastián Martínez-Castillo; José M Morales; Daniel Monleón; Vicente Zanon-Moreno
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2015-05-11       Impact factor: 2.367

Review 4.  A New Perspective on Dry Eye Classification: Proposal by the Asia Dry Eye Society.

Authors:  Kazuo Tsubota; Norihiko Yokoi; Hitoshi Watanabe; Murat Dogru; Takashi Kojima; Masakazu Yamada; Shigeru Kinoshita; Hyo-Myung Kim; Hung-Won Tchah; Joon Young Hyon; Kyung Chul Yoon; Kyoung Yul Seo; Xuguang Sun; Wei Chen; Lingyi Liang; Mingwu Li; Louis Tong; Fung-Rong Hu; Vilavun Puangsricharern; Ruben Lim-Bon-Siong; Then Kong Yong; Zuguo Liu; Jun Shimazaki
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.152

5.  A Practical Approach to Severity Classification and Treatment of Dry Eye Disease: A Proposal from the Mexican Dry Eye Disease Expert Panel.

Authors:  Alejandro Rodriguez-Garcia; Alejandro Babayan-Sosa; Arturo Ramirez-Miranda; Concepcion Santa Cruz-Valdes; Everardo Hernandez-Quintela; Julio C Hernandez-Camarena; Nallely Ramos-Betancourt; Regina Velasco-Ramos; Raul E Ruiz-Lozano
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-04-28

6.  High-Intensity Use of Smartphone Can Significantly Increase the Diagnostic Rate and Severity of Dry Eye.

Authors:  Chunyang Wang; Kelan Yuan; Yujie Mou; Yaying Wu; Xin Wang; Renjian Hu; Jinjin Min; Xiaodan Huang; Xiuming Jin
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-04-26

7.  A prospective, multicenter, noninterventional study of Optive Plus(®) in the treatment of patients with dry eye: the prolipid study.

Authors:  Thomas Kaercher; Ulrich Thelen; Gerrett Brief; Robert J Morgan-Warren; Richard Leaback
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-17

8.  Use of preservative-free hyaluronic acid (Hylabak(®)) for a range of patients with dry eye syndrome: experience in Russia.

Authors:  Vladimir Vsevolodovich Brjesky; Yury Fedorovich Maychuk; Alexey Vladimirovich Petrayevsky; Peter Gerrievich Nagorsky
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-18

9.  Diagnosing the severity of dry eye: a clear and practical algorithm.

Authors:  Christophe Baudouin; Pasquale Aragona; Gysbert Van Setten; Maurizio Rolando; Murat Irkeç; José Benítez del Castillo; Gerd Geerling; Marc Labetoulle; Stefano Bonini
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.638

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.