Literature DB >> 25999126

Does adjustable-loop femoral cortical suspension loosen after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A retrospective comparative study.

Matthew J Boyle1, Tyler J Vovos2, Cameron G Walker3, Kathryne J Stabile2, Jonathan M Roth2, William E Garrett2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent biomechanical research has suggested that adjustable-loop graft suspension constructs in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction may loosen after deployment. Our objective was to compare short-term knee stability and graft failure rate between adjustable-loop and fixed-loop femoral cortical suspension in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction.
METHODS: A consecutive series of 188 patients who underwent primary ACL reconstruction using hamstrings autograft by a single surgeon were divided into two groups; 73 received adjustable-loop (TightRope RT (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL)) and 115 received fixed-loop (RetroButton (Arthrex Inc., Naples, FL)) femoral cortical suspension. The two groups were compared at six months, one year, and two years postoperatively using KT-1000 arthrometer testing and graft failure rate (revision surgery, grade 2+ Lachman test, any pivot shift, >5mm side-to-side KT-1000 difference).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in maximum side-to-side difference in KT-1000 testing at six months (mean 1.51mm (adjustable-loop group) vs. 1.79mm (fixed-loop group), p=0.23), one year (mean 1.44mm vs. 1.64mm, p=0.48), or two years (mean 1.14mm vs. 1.07mm, p=0.90) postoperatively. There was no significant difference between the two groups in rate of graft failure (10% vs. 11%, p=0.71) or timing of graft failure in affected patients (mean 11.4months vs. 13.8months, p=0.51).
CONCLUSIONS: We found no significant difference in postoperative knee stability or graft failure rate between adjustable-loop and fixed-loop femoral cortical suspension in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Our results suggest that adjustable-loop suspension does not clinically loosen after ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (retrospective cohort study).
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; Anterior cruciate ligament; Graft failure; Knee stability

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25999126     DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.04.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee        ISSN: 0968-0160            Impact factor:   2.199


  28 in total

1.  A comparison of three adjustable cortical button ACL fixation devices.

Authors:  Meghan Pasquali; Matthew J Plante; Keith O Monchik; David B Spenciner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  All-inside ACL reconstruction: How does it compare to standard ACL reconstruction techniques?

Authors:  Alexander J Connaughton; Andrew G Geeslin; Christopher W Uggen
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2017-03-19

3.  Combined All-Inside Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Minimally Invasive Posterolateral Corner Reconstruction Using Ipsilateral Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autograft.

Authors:  Zakk M Borton; Sam K Yasen; Edward M Britton; Samuel R Heaton; Harry C Palmer; Adrian J Wilson
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-03-20

4.  Adjustable loop ACL suspension devices demonstrate less reliability in terms of reproducibility and irreversible displacement.

Authors:  Sufian S Ahmad; Michael T Hirschmann; Benjamin Voumard; Sandro Kohl; Philippe Zysset; Takura Mukabeta; Dimitrios S Evangelopoulos; Atesch Ateschrang
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Adjustable-loop implants are non-inferior to fixed-loop implants for femoral fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Simone B Elmholt; Torsten G Nielsen; Martin Lind
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Comparison of Fixed- and Variable-Loop Button Fixation in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Vijay Chandru; Santhosh M S; Sujana Theja J S; Rohit R Nair
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-17

7.  Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Comparative Clinical Study Between Adjustable and Fixed Length Suspension Devices.

Authors:  Bastian Uribe-Echevarria; Justin A Magnuson; Annunziato Amendola; Matthew J Bollier; Brian R Wolf; Carolyn M Hettrich
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2020

8.  Arthroscopic ACL reconstruction using fixed suspensory device versus adjustable suspensory device for femoral side graft fixation: What are the outcomes?

Authors:  Hardik Sheth; Abhijeet Ashok Salunke; Raghav Barve; Rajat Nirkhe
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-10

9.  Laterally shifted tibial tunnel can be the risk of residual knee laxity for double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Daisuke Chiba; Yuji Yamamoto; Yuka Kimura; Shizuka Sasaki; Eiji Sasaki; Shohei Yamauchi; Eiichi Tsuda; Yasuyuki Ishibashi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Adjustable Loop Femoral Cortical Suspension Devices for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sarvpreet Singh; Shalin Shaunak; Sebastian C K Shaw; John L Anderson; Vipul Mandalia
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.