Literature DB >> 21111873

Colonoscopy yields fewer polyps as the day progresses despite using social influence theory to reverse the trend.

Marc Kaneshiro1, Andrew Ho, Michael Chan, Hartley Cohen, Brennan M R Spiegel.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We previously reported that fewer polyps are detected by colonoscopy as the day progresses, a phenomenon that could be modified with "social influence theory" by using auditing and feedback.
OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of a social influence informational poster on the relationship between time of day and colonoscopy yield.
DESIGN: Controlled before-and-after study comparing the polyp yield and time of day relationship in a historical cohort versus a 3-month intervention period.
SETTING: University-based Veterans Affairs medical center. PATIENTS: Patients undergoing outpatient screening, surveillance, or diagnostic colonoscopies. INTERVENTION: Placement of informational posters in endoscopy rooms within view of operators and nurses. The poster depicted a bar graph of the previously documented hour-by-hour decreases in polyp yield coupled with prominent text: "What Time Is It Now?" MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: Polyp yield, including secondary end point limited to adenoma detection. We performed regression to measure the effect of start time on polyp yield.
RESULTS: There were 477 and 301 patients in the control and intervention periods, respectively. There was a negative relationship between start time and polyp yield, including adenoma detection, for both periods (P = .001). Start time remained negatively predictive of polyp and adenoma yield after adjusting for poster exposure and confounders (P = .01). LIMITATIONS: Nonrandomized study design.
CONCLUSION: An informational poster did not alter the relationship between colonoscopy start time and polyp yield. This strengthens the previous finding that start time may affect polyp yield and suggests that passive use of social influence theory is inadequate to modify this effect. Shortening endoscopy shifts and active auditing with feedback may be necessary.
Copyright © 2010 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21111873     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.08.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  10 in total

1.  If you have a low adenoma detection rate, don't blame your fellows.

Authors:  Dayna S Early
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Adenoma detection rates decline with increasing procedural hours in an endoscopist's workload.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Maida Sewitch; Alan N Barkun; Myriam Martel; Lawrence Joseph
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2015-05-21

3.  The day of the week does not affect the adenoma detection rate.

Authors:  Brenda G Jimenez Cantisano; Marlow Hernandez; Angelica Ramírez; Fernando J Castro
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-11-23       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Colonoscopic polyp detection rate is stable throughout the workday including evening colonoscopy sessions.

Authors:  David Thurtle; Michael Pullinger; Jordan Tsigarides; Iris McIntosh; Carla Steytler; Ian Beales
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2014-05-13

5.  Does a Pre-Training Program Influence Colonoscopy Proficiency during Fellowship?

Authors:  Duk Hwan Kim; Soo Jung Park; Jae Hee Cheon; Tae Il Kim; Won Ho Kim; Sung Pil Hong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Differences between morning and afternoon colonoscopies for adenoma detection in female and male patients.

Authors:  Shailendra Singh; Manish Dhawan; Monica Chowdhry; Michael Babich; Elie Aoun
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-06

7.  Computed tomographic colonography: how many and how fast should radiologists report?

Authors:  Anu E Obaro; Andrew A Plumb; Michael P North; Steve Halligan; David N Burling
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Factors predicting the colorectal adenoma detection rate in colonoscopic screening of a Chinese population: A prospective study.

Authors:  Han Wang; Pu Wang; Xiaogang Liu; Liangping Li; Xun Xiao; Peixi Liu; Di Zhang; Yi Li; Guangre Xu; Mengtian Tu; Yan Song
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

9.  Association of Intensive Endoscopic Screening Burden With Gastric Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Choong-Kyun Noh; Eunyoung Lee; Gil Ho Lee; Joon Koo Kang; Sun Gyo Lim; Bumhee Park; Jae Bum Park; Sung Jae Shin; Jae Youn Cheong; Jin Hong Kim; Kee Myung Lee
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-01-04

Review 10.  When should we perform colonoscopy to increase the adenoma detection rate?

Authors:  Sang Hoon Kim; Jae Hak Kim
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2021-12-16
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.