Literature DB >> 25995510

An international comparison study of pharmacy students' achievement goals and their relationship to assessment type and scores.

Saleh Alrakaf1, Claire Anderson2, Sion A Coulman3, Dai N John3, June Tordoff4, Erica Sainsbury1, Grenville Rose5, Lorraine Smith1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify pharmacy students' preferred achievement goals in a multi-national undergraduate population, to investigate achievement goal preferences across comparable degree programs, and to identify relationships between achievement goals, academic performance, and assessment type.
METHODS: The Achievement Goal Questionnaire was administered to second year students in 4 universities in Australia, New Zealand, England, and Wales. Academic performance was measured using total scores, multiple-choice questions, and written answers (short essay).
RESULTS: Four hundred eighty-six second year students participated. Students showed an overall preference for the mastery-approach goal orientation across all sites. The predicted relationships between goal orientation and multiple-choice questions, and written answers scores, were significant.
CONCLUSION: This study is the first of its kind to examine pharmacy students' achievement goals at a multi-national level and to differentiate between assessment type and measures of achievement motivation. Students adopting a mastery-approach goal are more likely to gain high scores in assessments that measure understanding and depth of knowledge.

Keywords:  Achievement goals; academic achievement; assessment type; comparison study; pharmacy education

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25995510      PMCID: PMC4428420          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe79335

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  7 in total

1.  A 2 X 2 achievement goal framework.

Authors:  A J Elliot; H A McGregor
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2001-03

2.  A cross-cultural analysis of avoidance (relative to approach) personal goals.

Authors:  A J Elliot; V I Chirkov; Y Kim; K M Sheldon
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2001-11

3.  A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels?

Authors:  Chris S Hulleman; Sheree M Schrager; Shawn M Bodmann; Judith M Harackiewicz
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Do undergraduates' motives for studying change as they progress through their degrees?

Authors:  David A Lieberman; Richard Remedios
Journal:  Br J Educ Psychol       Date:  2007-06

5.  Pharmacy students' approaches to learning in an Australian university.

Authors:  Lorraine Smith; Bandana Saini; Ines Krass; Timothy Chen; Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich; Erica Sainsbury
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-12-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Identifying achievement goals and their relationship to academic achievement in undergraduate pharmacy students.

Authors:  Saleh Alrakaf; Erica Sainsbury; Grenville Rose; Lorraine Smith
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Measuring achievement goal orientations of pharmacy students.

Authors:  Paul Gavaza; Thomas Muthart; Ghous M Khan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 2.047

  7 in total
  4 in total

1.  Evaluation of a Flipped Examination Model Implemented in a Final-Year Undergraduate Pharmacotherapeutics Course.

Authors:  Maya Saba; Iriny Metry; Cherie Lucas; Bandana Saini
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Integration of the Pharmacists' Patient Care Process into a Comprehensive Disease Management Course Series.

Authors:  Benjamin Bowar; Bryan C McCarthy
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Student Personality Style and First-Year Academic Performance in a Doctor of Pharmacy Program.

Authors:  Jon P Wietholter; Lena M Maynor; Jennifer L Clutter
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  Adult Learning Theories in Context: A Quick Guide for Healthcare Professional Educators.

Authors:  Banan Abdulrzaq Mukhalalati; Andrea Taylor
Journal:  J Med Educ Curric Dev       Date:  2019-04-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.