Literature DB >> 25995469

Relating cerebellar purkinje cell activity to the timing and amplitude of conditioned eyelid responses.

Hunter E Halverson1, Andrei Khilkevich2, Michael D Mauk3.   

Abstract

How Purkinje cell (PC) activity may be altered by learning is central to theories of the cerebellum. Pavlovian eyelid conditioning, because of how directly it engages the cerebellum, has helped reveal many aspects of cerebellar learning and the underlying mechanisms. Theories of cerebellar learning assert that climbing fiber inputs control plasticity at synapses onto PCs, and thus PCs control the expression of learned responses. We tested this assertion by recording 184 eyelid PCs and 240 non-eyelid PCs during the expression of conditioned eyelid responses (CRs) in well trained rabbits. By contrasting the responses of eyelid and non-eyelid PCs and by contrasting the responses of eyelid PCs under conditions that produce differently timed CRs, we test the hypothesis that learning-related changes in eyelid PCs contribute to the learning and adaptive timing of the CRs. We used a variety of analyses to test the quantitative relationships between eyelid PC responses and the kinematic properties of the eyelid CRs. We find that the timing of eyelid PC responses varies systematically with the timing of the behavioral CRs and that there are differences in the magnitude of eyelid PC responses between larger-CR, smaller-CR, and non-CR trials. However, eyelid PC activity does not encode any single kinematic property of the behavioral CRs at a fixed time lag, nor does it linearly encode CR amplitude. Even so, the results are consistent with the hypothesis that learning-dependent changes in PC activity contribute to the adaptively timed expression of conditioned eyelid responses.
Copyright © 2015 the authors 0270-6474/15/357813-20$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Purkinje cell; amplitude; cerebellum; eyelid conditioning; tetrode recording; timing

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25995469      PMCID: PMC4438128          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3663-14.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  52 in total

Review 1.  Computer simulation of cerebellar information processing.

Authors:  J F Medina; M D Mauk
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Mechanisms of cerebellar learning suggested by eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  J F Medina; W L Nores; T Ohyama; M D Mauk
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Cerebellar cortical inhibition and classical eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Shaowen Bao; Lu Chen; Jeansok J Kim; Richard F Thompson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Acquisition of eyeblink conditioning is critically dependent on normal function in cerebellar cortical lobule HVI.

Authors:  P J Attwell; S Rahman; C H Yeo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Inhibition of climbing fibres is a signal for the extinction of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  Javier F Medina; William L Nores; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-03-21       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Ontogeny of eyeblink conditioned response timing in rats.

Authors:  John H Freeman; Daniel A Nicholson; Adam S Muckler; Christine A Rabinak; Norma T DiPietro
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.912

7.  Purkinje cell activity during learning a new timing in classical eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Sadaharu Kotani; Shigenori Kawahara; Yutaka Kirino
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Cerebellar cortical AMPA-kainate receptor blockade prevents performance of classically conditioned nictitating membrane responses.

Authors:  P J Attwell; S Rahman; M Ivarsson; C H Yeo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cerebellar cortex lesions prevent acquisition of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  K S Garcia; P M Steele; M D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Eyeblink classical conditioning and interpositus nucleus activity are disrupted in adult rats exposed to ethanol as neonates.

Authors:  John T Green; Timothy B Johnson; Charles R Goodlett; Joseph E Steinmetz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

View more
  37 in total

1.  Purkinje cell activity during classical conditioning with different conditional stimuli explains central tenet of Rescorla–Wagner model [corrected].

Authors:  Anders Rasmussen; Riccardo Zucca; Fredrik Johansson; Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  A Slow Short-Term Depression at Purkinje to Deep Cerebellar Nuclear Neuron Synapses Supports Gain-Control and Linear Encoding over Second-Long Time Windows.

Authors:  Christine M Pedroarena
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cerebellar Control of Reach Kinematics for Endpoint Precision.

Authors:  Matthew I Becker; Abigail L Person
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Learned response sequences in cerebellar Purkinje cells.

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Anders Rasmussen; Fredrik Johansson; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Regulation and Interaction of Multiple Types of Synaptic Plasticity in a Purkinje Neuron and Their Contribution to Motor Learning.

Authors:  Tomoo Hirano
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Cerebellar Processing Common to Delay and Trace Eyelid Conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; Andrei Khilkevich; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-16       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Intracerebellar cannabinoid administration impairs delay but not trace eyeblink conditioning.

Authors:  Adam B Steinmetz; John H Freeman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2019-09-24       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Taxonomies of Timing: Where Does the Cerebellum Fit In?

Authors:  Assaf Breska; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2016-04

9.  Systematic variation of acquisition rate in delay eyelid conditioning.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; Loren C Hoffmann; Yujin Kim; Eszter A Kish; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-19       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Intrinsic Excitability Increase in Cerebellar Purkinje Cells after Delay Eye-Blink Conditioning in Mice.

Authors:  Heather K Titley; Gabrielle V Watkins; Carmen Lin; Craig Weiss; Michael McCarthy; John F Disterhoft; Christian Hansel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.