Literature DB >> 14642645

Purkinje cell activity during learning a new timing in classical eyeblink conditioning.

Sadaharu Kotani1, Shigenori Kawahara, Yutaka Kirino.   

Abstract

During classical eyeblink conditioning, animals acquire adaptive timing of the conditioned response (CR) to the interstimulus interval (ISI) between the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US). To investigate this coding of the timing by the cerebellum, we analyzed Purkinje cell activities during acquisition of new timing after we shifted the ISI. Decerebrate guinea pigs were conditioned to an asymptotic level of learning using a delay paradigm with a 250-ms ISI. A 350-ms tone and a 100-ms electrical shock were used as the CS and US, respectively. As reported previously in other species, Purkinje cells in the simplex lobe exhibited three types of responses to the CS: excitatory, inhibitory, or a combination of the two. After we increased the ISI to 400 ms, the frequency of the CR stayed at an asymptotic level, but the latency of the CR peak became gradually longer. Two types of cells were observed, based on changes in the nature of their response to the CS; one changed its type of response in parallel with learning the new timing, while the other did not. There was no correlation between the type of response before and after we changed the ISI. In some cells, the peak latency of activities became longer or shorter, while the type of response did not change. These results suggest that some Purkinje cells code the timing of the CR, but do not play a consistent role in shaping the CR over a range of ISIs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14642645     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2003.09.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  21 in total

1.  Lock-and-key mechanisms of cerebellar memory recall based on rebound currents.

Authors:  Daniel Z Wetmore; Eran A Mukamel; Mark J Schnitzer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 2.  Evaluating dedicated and intrinsic models of temporal encoding by varying context.

Authors:  Rebecca M C Spencer; Uma Karmarkar; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Neural networks engaged in milliseconds and seconds time processing: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation and patients with cortical or subcortical dysfunction.

Authors:  Giacomo Koch; Massimiliano Oliveri; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-07-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Learning stimulus intervals--adaptive timing of conditioned purkinje cell responses.

Authors:  Dan-Anders Jirenhed; Germund Hesslow
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.847

5.  Relating cerebellar purkinje cell activity to the timing and amplitude of conditioned eyelid responses.

Authors:  Hunter E Halverson; Andrei Khilkevich; Michael D Mauk
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Spike-coding mechanisms of cerebellar temporal processing in classical conditioning and voluntary movements.

Authors:  Kenji Yamaguchi; Yoshio Sakurai
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 7.  Cerebellar motor function in spina bifida meningomyelocele.

Authors:  Maureen Dennis; Michael S Salman; Jenifer Juranek; Jack M Fletcher
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.847

8.  Neural correlates of multisensory perceptual learning.

Authors:  Albert R Powers; Matthew A Hevey; Mark T Wallace
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Eyeblink conditioning during an interstimulus interval switch in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) using picrotoxin to disrupt cerebellar cortical input to the interpositus nucleus.

Authors:  Richard W Vogel; Jeffrey C Amundson; Derick H Lindquist; Joseph E Steinmetz
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

10.  Interval timing disruptions in subjects with cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  Cynthia M Gooch; Martin Wiener; Elaine B Wencil; H Branch Coslett
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 3.139

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.