Literature DB >> 25990764

Boosting multi-state models.

Holger Reulen1, Thomas Kneib2.   

Abstract

One important goal in multi-state modelling is to explore information about conditional transition-type-specific hazard rate functions by estimating influencing effects of explanatory variables. This may be performed using single transition-type-specific models if these covariate effects are assumed to be different across transition-types. To investigate whether this assumption holds or whether one of the effects is equal across several transition-types (cross-transition-type effect), a combined model has to be applied, for instance with the use of a stratified partial likelihood formulation. Here, prior knowledge about the underlying covariate effect mechanisms is often sparse, especially about ineffectivenesses of transition-type-specific or cross-transition-type effects. As a consequence, data-driven variable selection is an important task: a large number of estimable effects has to be taken into account if joint modelling of all transition-types is performed. A related but subsequent task is model choice: is an effect satisfactory estimated assuming linearity, or is the true underlying nature strongly deviating from linearity? This article introduces component-wise Functional Gradient Descent Boosting (short boosting) for multi-state models, an approach performing unsupervised variable selection and model choice simultaneously within a single estimation run. We demonstrate that features and advantages in the application of boosting introduced and illustrated in classical regression scenarios remain present in the transfer to multi-state models. As a consequence, boosting provides an effective means to answer questions about ineffectiveness and non-linearity of single transition-type-specific or cross-transition-type effects.

Keywords:  Boosting; Cross-transition-type effects; Model choice; Multi-state models; Non-linear effects; Variable selection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25990764     DOI: 10.1007/s10985-015-9329-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal        ISSN: 1380-7870            Impact factor:   1.588


  13 in total

1.  Multi-state models in epidemiology.

Authors:  D Commenges
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Frailties in multi-state models: Are they identifiable? Do we need them?

Authors:  Hein Putter; Hans C van Houwelingen
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Tutorial in biostatistics: competing risks and multi-state models.

Authors:  H Putter; M Fiocco; R B Geskus
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Predicting survival from microarray data--a comparative study.

Authors:  H M Bøvelstad; S Nygård; H L Størvold; M Aldrin; Ø Borgan; A Frigessi; O C Lingjaerde
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Model building in nonproportional hazard regression.

Authors:  Mar Rodríguez-Girondo; Thomas Kneib; Carmen Cadarso-Suárez; Emad Abu-Assi
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Variable selection and model choice in geoadditive regression models.

Authors:  Thomas Kneib; Torsten Hothorn; Gerhard Tutz
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model.

Authors:  Jelle J Goeman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.207

8.  The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model.

Authors:  R Tibshirani
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1997-02-28       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Cross-validated Cox regression on microarray gene expression data.

Authors:  Hans C van Houwelingen; Tako Bruinsma; Augustinus A M Hart; Laura J Van't Veer; Lodewyk F A Wessels
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2006-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Penalized likelihood in Cox regression.

Authors:  P J Verweij; H C Van Houwelingen
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1994 Dec 15-30       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  3 in total

1.  Bayesian continuous-time hidden Markov models with covariate selection for intensive longitudinal data with measurement error.

Authors:  Mingrui Liang; Matthew D Koslovsky; Emily T Hébert; Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle; Marina Vannucci
Journal:  Psychol Methods       Date:  2021-12-20

2.  Bayesian variable selection for multistate Markov models with interval-censored data in an ecological momentary assessment study of smoking cessation.

Authors:  Matthew D Koslovsky; Michael D Swartz; Wenyaw Chan; Luis Leon-Novelo; Anna V Wilkinson; Darla E Kendzor; Michael S Businelle
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 3.  An Update on Statistical Boosting in Biomedicine.

Authors:  Andreas Mayr; Benjamin Hofner; Elisabeth Waldmann; Tobias Hepp; Sebastian Meyer; Olaf Gefeller
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-08-02       Impact factor: 2.238

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.