Literature DB >> 25990378

Female Sexual Function Before and After Bariatric Surgery: a Cross-Sectional Study and Review of Literature.

Michał Robert Janik1, Ilona Bielecka, Krzysztof Paśnik, Andrzej Kwiatkowski, Ludmiła Podgórska.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aims of the present study were to compare sexual quality of life and prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) after surgical weight loss with controls seeking bariatric surgery, and to perform a literature review.
METHODS: Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Sexual Quality of Life-Female (SQoL-F) questionnaires were sent within 12-18 months postoperatively via e-mail to 153 women who had undergone weight loss surgery (postoperative group). The control group comprised of 23 women who were asked to complete the questionnaires during their preoperative evaluation (preoperative group). The total FSFI cutoff score for a diagnosis of FSD was ≤ 26.55.
RESULTS: The median (Q1, Q3) FSFI score did not differ significantly between the preoperative (26.9 [24.3, 30.7]) and postoperative groups (26.9 [22.6, 30.0]). There was no difference in the prevalence of FSD between groups. However, median scores in FSFI domains of desire and arousal were significantly higher in the postoperative group. There were no differences in the other FSFI domains. The median SQoL-F was significantly higher in the postoperative group.
CONCLUSIONS: The FSFI score did not predict the SQoL-F score. The prevalence of FSD was comparable in the two groups. The higher SQoL-F score in the postoperative group may be the result of an improvement in self-esteem, which in turn leads to greater interest in sex and more intense feelings of desire and arousal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25990378      PMCID: PMC4498227          DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1721-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


Introduction

An increasing incidence of obesity across the USA and Europe has been observed in the last decade [1]. Obesity is accompanied by comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes, hypertension, heart disease, hyperlipidemia, and obstructive sleep apnea [2]. Obesity also reduces the quality of life including sexual quality of life [3]. The negative impact of obesity on general health and socioeconomic issues results in increased financial burden on the entire community [4]. Bariatric surgery is the most effective treatment for obesity and its comorbidities; meta-analysis has confirmed that the efficacy of bariatric procedures is superior to those of current medical therapies [5, 6]. However, little is known about the impact of weight loss after bariatric surgery on sexual quality of life. Female sexual dysfunction (FSD) comprises of impairment of sexual response cycle and pain during or after intercourse [7]; obese women who attempt to qualify for bariatric surgery have been shown to be at higher risk of experiencing FSD [8, 9]. However, the relationship between obesity and disturbances in female sexual function is not well defined. Changes in sexual quality of life and incidence of FSD after bariatric surgery have only been assessed by a few authors, with conflicting results. There is a need to explore this neglected area of bariatric care so that changes in overall quality of life after surgical weight loss can be better understood. The aim of our study was to compare sexual quality of life and the prevalence of FSD before and after the surgical treatment of obesity.

Materials and Methods

Study Design and Participants

This cross-sectional study was performed in our Department of Surgery between January and March 2014. The experimental group (postoperative group) comprised of 153 females in the period of 12–18 months after undergoing bariatric surgery, either laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) or laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). The control group (preoperative group) consisted of 23 pre-LSG and pre-LRYGB females. All participants completed a demographic questionnaire and a health history checklist. In the postoperative group, data was collected using an e-mailed questionnaire. The preoperative group was asked to complete the questionnaires during their preoperative evaluation. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. All participants met the Interdisciplinary European Guidelines on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery criteria for bariatric surgery [10]. Women who were not sexually active were excluded from the study. Moreover, excluded from the study were patients with a history of medication use, such as antidepressants, psychotropic drugs, beta-blockers, and spironolactone, which can interfere with sexual function.

Measures

Both groups were asked to complete the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) and Sexual Quality of Life–Female (SQoL-F) questionnaires, which are described in detail in Tables 1 and 2.
Table 1

Individual FSFI domains: questions and scoring

DomainQuestionsMinimum scoreMaximum scorePreoperative groupPostoperative group p value*
Desire1, 21.26.04.2 (3.0, 4.2)4.8 (4.5, 5.4)<0.01
Arousal3, 4, 5, 606.03.9 (3.6, 4.8)5.7 (4.8, 6.0)<0.01
Lubrication7, 8, 9, 1006.05.1 (4.2, 6.0)4.6 (3.9, 5,7)0.25
Orgasm11, 12, 1306.04.8 (3.6, 5.2)4.4 (3.6, 5.6)0.67
Satisfaction14, 15, 160.86.04.8 (3.8, 5.6)4.8 (3.6, 5.2)0.91
Pain17, 18, 1906.06.0 (3.6, 6.0)4.0 (3.8, 5.0)0.21
Total score2.036.026.9 (24.3, 30.7)26.9 (22.6, 30.0)0.44

FSFI Female Sexual Function Index.

Table 2

Sexual Quality of Life–Female questionnaire: comparison of item scores between preoperative and postoperative groups

ItemMaximum number of pointsPreoperative groupPostoperative group p value*
1. When I think about my sexual life, it is an enjoyable part of my life overall64.7 (3.5, 5.0)4.0 (4, 6)0.08
2. When I think about my sexual life, I feel frustrated64.0 (3, 5)5.0 (5, 6)<0.01
3. When I think about my sexual life, I feel depressed64.4 (3, 6)5.0 (4, 6)0.33
4. When I think about my sexual life, I feel like less of a woman64.3 (2, 6)4.7 (4, 6)0.57
5. When I think about my sexual life, I feel good about myself63.3 (2, 5)4.0 (3, 5)0.10
6. I have lost confidence in myself as a sexual partner63.4 (2.0, 5.0)5.1 (4.5, 6.0)<0.01
7. When I think about my sexual life, I feel anxious63.8 (2.0, 5.0)5.3 (5.0, 6.0)<0.01
8. When I think about my sexual life, I feel angry64.0 (3.0, 5.0)5.2 (5.0, 6.0)<0.01
9. When I think about my sexual life, I feel close to my partner64.2 (2.0, 6.0)3.6 (2.0, 5.0)0.08
10. I worry about the future of my sexual life63.3 (2.0, 5.0)4.6 (4.0, 6.0)0.01
11. I have lost pleasure in sexual activity63.7 (4.0, 5.0)4.6 (4.0, 6.0)0.16
12. When I think about my sexual life, I am embarrassed63.6 (2.0, 5.0)5.2 (5.0, 6.0)<0.01
13. When I think about my sexual life, I feel that I can talk to my partner about sexual matters64.4 (4.0, 6.0)3.2 (2.0, 4.5)0.02
14. I try to avoid sexual activity64.2 (3.0, 6.0)4.6 (4.0, 5.0)0.58
15. When I think about my sexual life, I feel guilty64.3 (3.0, 6.0)5.5 (5.0, 6.0)<0.01
16. When I think about my sexual life, I worry that my partner feels hurt or rejected63.0 (2, 5)6.0 (5.0, 6.0)<0.01
17. When I think about my sexual life, I feel like I have lost something64.0 (2.0, 5.0)6.0 (4.0, 6.0)<0.01
18. When I think about my sexual life, I am satisfied with the frequency of sexual activity63.3 (2.0, 5.0)3.1 (2.0, 4.5)0.73
Total score10860.0 (48.8, 73.3)75.0 (64.4, 82.2)0.04

Data are presented as median (Q1, Q3)

*p< 0.05 is statistically significant

Individual FSFI domains: questions and scoring FSFI Female Sexual Function Index. Sexual Quality of Life–Female questionnaire: comparison of item scores between preoperative and postoperative groups Data are presented as median (Q1, Q3) *p< 0.05 is statistically significant The FSFI was introduced by Rosen et al. [11]. It is a 19-item self-report questionnaire that assesses the level of functioning in the past 6 months across six domains: (1) sexual desire, (2) sexual arousal, (3) lubrication, (4) orgasm, (5) sexual satisfaction, and (6) sexual pain. Higher scores for each domain and higher total scores indicate better sexual function. The FSFI is widely accepted and used to assess disturbances in female sexual function. Lack of sexual activity, including no sexual activity and did not attempt intercourse, was defined as a negative answer for most of the 15 items. The total FSFI cutoff score for the diagnosis of FSD in bariatric patients was ≤26.55 [8]. The SQoL-F is an 18-item self-report questionnaire developed by Symonds et al. [12]. It assesses the impact of sexual dysfunction on a woman’s sexual quality of life. Each question is scored on a six-point scale ranging from completely agree to completely disagree. A higher total score reflects a better sexual quality of life. Demographic characteristics of age, weight, height, and marital status were collected using an additional questionnaire.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using SAS® software, Version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). Fisher’s exact test was used to determine differences in the prevalence of FSD between groups. The unpaired t test and the Mann–Whitney U test were used to assess differences in participants’ scores. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was used to assess the relationships of body mass index (BMI) to FSFI total score and of BMI versus SQoL-F total score. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Literature Review

A review of articles published within the last decade was conducted. Studies were identified by searching the PubMed database for the phrases: female sexual dysfunction index and bariatric surgery. We included only English-language articles presenting cohort studies that employed the FSFI questionnaire. Data regarding the prevalence of FSD and the total FSFI score were obtained from the studies.

Results

The survey response rate was 85 % in the preoperative (control) group and 20 % in the postoperative (experimental) group. The groups were comparable in age and smoking status but differed significantly in BMI, comorbidities, hometown population, and marital status. The preoperative group reported comorbidities of hypertension, diabetes, hypothyroidism, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea, and coronary artery, whereas the postoperative group reported only hypertension. There were four categories regarding marital status: married, divorced, cohabitating, and single. The preoperative group had fewer married women (57 vs. 64 %) and more single women (19 vs. 11 %) than the postoperative group. However, when married and cohabiting were combined under partnered status, the groups were comparable (preoperative 76 % vs. postoperative 78 %). Women in the postoperative group more often lived in small cities (<100,000 inhabitants). In the postoperative group, 64 % underwent LRYGB and 36 % underwent LSG. Patient characteristics are shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Sociodemographic characteristics of patients

CharacteristicPreoperative group(n = 21/23)Postoperative group(n = 28/31) p value
Age (years)41 ± 944 ± 120.14
BMI (kg/m2)46 ± 626 ± 3<0.01
Comorbidities (%)<0.01
 Hypertension65 %4 %
 Diabetes25 %0 %
 Hyperlipidemia5 %0 %
 Hypothyroidism20 %0 %
 Obstructive sleep apnea5 %0 %
 Coronary artery disease5 %0 %
Marital status (%)0.02
 Partnered76 %78 %
 Married57 %64 %
 Cohabiting19 %14 %
 Divorced5 %11 %
 Single19 %11 %
Smoking status (%)0.05
 Never-smoker56 %43 %
 Current smoker18 %24 %
 Former smoker26 %33 %
Hometown population (%)<0.01
 <100,0000 %14 %
 100,000–250,00019 %10 %
 250,000–500,0008 %10 %
 >500,00073 %66 %

p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance

BMI body mass index

Sociodemographic characteristics of patients p < 0.05 indicates statistical significance BMI body mass index

Sexual Function and Sexual Quality of Life

The median (Q1, Q3) total FSFI scores for the preoperative and postoperative groups were 26.9 (24.3, 30.7) and 26.9 (22.6, 30.0), respectively. On the basis of the total FSFI score, FSD was diagnosed in 10 of 20 patients (50 %) in the preoperative group and 14 of 28 (50 %) in the postoperative group (Fig. 1). The lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and sex domains did not differ between groups. However, the postoperative group had a significantly higher median in (Q1, Q3) desire (4.8 [4.5, 5.4] vs. 3.6 [3.0, 4.2]) and arousal (5.7 [4.8, 6.0] vs. 3.9 [3.6, 4.8]) scores (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The median (Q1, Q3) total SQoL-F score was significantly higher in the postoperative group (p = 0.04, Table 2).
Fig. 1

Prevalence of FSD in the preoperative (n = 20) and postoperative (n = 28) groups. *Incomplete FSFI questionnaire in one case. FSD female sexual dysfunction

Fig. 2

FSFI distribution by domain in preoperative and postoperative groups. FSFI Female Sexual Function Index. *p < 0.05

Prevalence of FSD in the preoperative (n = 20) and postoperative (n = 28) groups. *Incomplete FSFI questionnaire in one case. FSD female sexual dysfunction FSFI distribution by domain in preoperative and postoperative groups. FSFI Female Sexual Function Index. *p < 0.05

Associations Between Sexual Function and BMI

There were significant negative correlations between BMI and FSFI total score (r = −0.697, p < 0.0001) and between BMI and SQoL-F total score (r = −0.671, p < 0.0001) in the postoperative group. No relationships were observed between BMI and FSFI or SQoL-F score in the preoperative group. Table 4 shows the correlations between BMI and total FSFI and SQoL-F scores for both groups.
Table 4

Correlations between BMI and total FSFI and SQoL-F scores by group

Preoperative groupPostoperative group
FSFI total scoreSQoL-F total scoreFSFI total scoreSQoL-F total score
BMI r –0.362–0.368–0.697–0.671
p 0.150.11<0.0001<0.0001

BMI body mass index, FSFI Female Sexual Function Index, SQoL-F Sexual Quality of Life–Female

Correlations between BMI and total FSFI and SQoL-F scores by group BMI body mass index, FSFI Female Sexual Function Index, SQoL-F Sexual Quality of Life–Female Six articles met our criteria for inclusion in the literature review. In all, 364 patients underwent bariatric procedures, including RYGB, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, laparoscopic adjustable gastric band, and biliopancreatic diversion. All of these patients were administered the FSFI questionnaire before and after surgery. Results are presented in Table 5.
Table 5

Literature review

Author (year)Surgical proceduresPreoperativePostoperative
n BMITotal FSFI scoreFSD (%) n BMITotal FSFI scoreFSD (%)Cutoff for FSD diagnosisFollow-up (months)
Assimakopoulos et al. (2011)[13]*BPD-LL, RYGB-LL, SG5951.9 ± 9.920.7 ± 2.25931.8 ± 4.925.0 ± 10.312
Bond et al. (2011)[14], LAGB, RYGB5445.1 ± 6.824.0 ± 6.3635429.4 ± 4.322≤26.556
Lergo et al. (2012)[15]*RYGB2949 ± 721.2 ± 9.6927.1 ± 7.412
Olivera et al. (2012)[16]LAGB, RYGB, LSG3645.76 ± 6.4817.70 ± 8.383631.5516.91 ± 9.75≤26.036
Hernández et al. (2013)[17]*BPD8052.2 ± 8.219.9 ± 1.66030.4 ± 3.5<26.512
Sarwer et al. (2014)[18]*LAGB, RYGB10644.520.3 ± 10.810324.8 ± 8.3≤26.024

BPD biliopancreatic diversion, BPD-LL biliopancreatic diversion with long-limb Roux-en-Y reconstruction, RYGB-LL Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with long limb, LAGB laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, LSG laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

*p < 0.05 for difference in mean total FSFI score

Literature review BPD biliopancreatic diversion, BPD-LL biliopancreatic diversion with long-limb Roux-en-Y reconstruction, RYGB-LL Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with long limb, LAGB laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding, LSG laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy *p < 0.05 for difference in mean total FSFI score

Discussion

This study explored the under-investigated area of female sexual quality of life. In the majority of papers in which FSFI questionnaires were administered, FSD resolved after surgical treatment [13–15, 17, 18]. In contrast, our results do not demonstrate a difference in the prevalence of FSD between the preoperative group and the response-compliant postoperative group. However, a detailed analysis of the FSFI domains revealed significantly higher scores in domains concerning desire and arousal in the postoperative group. The findings are similar to those presented by Olivera et al. [16]. In three recent papers, no significant differences in the prevalence of FSD between healthy controls and obese individuals were observed [19-21], thus challenging the idea that obesity is a risk factor for female sexual dysfunction. In the present study, however, we observed significantly higher total SQoL-F scores in the postoperative group, indicating a better sexual quality of life in patients who underwent surgery. Unfortunately, because the SQoL-F questionnaire is rarely used in papers on obesity and surgical weight loss, no data is available for comparison. Such contradictory results beg the question, “Why did the postoperative group have a higher mean total score on the SQoL-F questionnaire?” In our opinion, the different structures of the two measurement methods may explain the results. The SQoL-F consists mainly of questions referring to the emotional aspect of sexual life, such as desire, arousal, self-esteem, anxiety, and satisfaction. As shown in Table 2, women in the postoperative group were less frustrated with their sex life, felt more confident, and were less afraid of hurting or rejecting a partner. The FSFI questionnaire assesses a wider range of female sexual function, including both emotional (desire, arousal) and physical (lubrication, orgasm, dyspareunia) aspects. In the present study, women who lost weight after surgery felt more attractive and comfortable with themselves. This improvement in self-esteem and lack of anxiety may have resulted in more interest in sex and including more intense feelings of desire and arousal. Interestingly, our study revealed significant negative correlations between BMI and total scores for both questionnaires in the postoperative group but not in the preoperative group. Thus, it suggests that the amount of weight loss achieved after surgery affects female sexual quality of life. We postulate that improvements in female sexual quality of life after bariatric surgery may be proportional with the percentage of excess weight loss.

Limitations

The study had several limitations. First, the number of patients in both groups was small. Taking into account the fact that we broke down the questionnaires and interpreted them by item, it has to be pointed out that small populations do not guarantee a strong insight. Second, the sensitive nature of the research topic and the restraint of Polish women to talk about sexual activities may have contributed to the low compliance in the postoperative group. However, this low response rate (20 %) corresponds with those in other studies assessing the prevalence of female sexual difficulty and dysfunction, which have ranged from 15 to 33 % with an average response rate of 19 % [22]. Third, because the present study was cross-sectional, a causal relationship between percentage of excess weight loss after bariatric surgery and changes in female sexual quality of life could not be assessed. It should also be pointed out that body contouring after major weight loss may be a confounding factor, and neither the present study nor the reviewed studies took this into account. We also did not collect data regarding educational status or income. Finally, the cutoff score for the diagnosis of FSD varied from study to study.

Conclusions

In the present study, the FSFI score did not predict the SQoL-F score. Women who lost weight after bariatric surgery felt more attractive and comfortable with themselves. This improvement in self-esteem and reduction in anxiety may result in more interest in sex and including more intense feelings of desire and arousal.
  21 in total

1.  Association of body weight with sexual function in women.

Authors:  K Esposito; M Ciotola; F Giugliano; C Bisogni; B Schisano; R Autorino; L Cobellis; M De Sio; N Colacurci; D Giugliano
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  Sexual functioning and sex hormones in persons with extreme obesity and seeking surgical and nonsurgical weight loss.

Authors:  David B Sarwer; Jacqueline C Spitzer; Thomas A Wadden; Raymond C Rosen; James E Mitchell; Kathy Lancaster; Anita Courcoulas; William Gourash; Nicholas J Christian
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 4.734

3.  Sexual dysfunction in obese and overweight women.

Authors:  G F Yaylali; S Tekekoglu; F Akin
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Obesity might not be a risk factor for female sexual dysfunction.

Authors:  Pinar Kadioglu; Demet Ozgil Yetkin; Oner Sanli; Ayse Serap Yalin; Kadir Onem; Ates Kadioglu
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Meta-analysis: surgical treatment of obesity.

Authors:  Melinda A Maggard; Lisa R Shugarman; Marika Suttorp; Margaret Maglione; Harvey J Sugerman; Harvey J Sugarman; Edward H Livingston; Ninh T Nguyen; Zhaoping Li; Walter A Mojica; Lara Hilton; Shannon Rhodes; Sally C Morton; Paul G Shekelle
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Development of a questionnaire on sexual quality of life in women.

Authors:  Tara Symonds; Mitra Boolell; Frances Quirk
Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther       Date:  2005 Oct-Dec

7.  Assessing sexual function in obese women preparing for bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Konstantinos Assimakopoulos; Spiros Panayiotopoulos; Gregoris Iconomou; Katerina Karaivazoglou; Charalambos Matzaroglou; Konstantinos Vagenas; Fotis Kalfarentzos
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.129

8.  Prevalence and degree of sexual dysfunction in a sample of women seeking bariatric surgery.

Authors:  Dale S Bond; Siva Vithiananthan; Tricia M Leahey; J Graham Thomas; Harry C Sax; Dieter Pohl; Beth A Ryder; G Dean Roye; Jeannine Giovanni; Rena R Wing
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2009-07-24       Impact factor: 4.734

9.  Modeling response rates in surveys of female sexual difficulty and dysfunction.

Authors:  Richard D Hayes; Catherine Bennett; Lorraine Dennerstein; Lyle Gurrin; Christopher Fairley
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Remission of female sexual dysfunction in morbidly obese female patients with the Scopinaro procedure.

Authors:  Juan R Hernández Hernández; Eudaldo López-Tomassetti Fernández; Yurena Caballero Díaz; Jesus Molina Cabrillana; Dieter Morales García; Valentin Núñez Jorge
Journal:  Surg Obes Relat Dis       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.734

View more
  15 in total

1.  Bariatric Surgery Significantly Improves the Quality of Sexual Life and Self-esteem in Morbidly Obese Women.

Authors:  Faredj Cherick; Vanessa Te; Rodolphe Anty; Laurent Turchi; Michel Benoit; Luigi Schiavo; Antonio Iannelli
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Resolution of Female Sexual Dysfunction (FSD) Among the Obese Multiethnic Malaysian Women Now a Reality with Bariatric Surgery: a Prospective Pilot Study in Malaysia.

Authors:  Sivaneswaran Lechmiannandan; Mayurran Panirselvam; Prema Muninathan; Narwani Hussin; Reynu Rajan; Hatta Sidi; Nik Ritza Kosai; C Rajkumar Vinayak
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Impact of Bariatric Surgery on Female Sexual Function in Obese Patients: a Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Zhiguang Gao; Yuzhi Liang; Weijun Deng; Peicai Qiu; Min Li; Zhiqiu Zhou
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.129

4.  Effect of Body Weight on Sexual Function in Men and Women.

Authors:  Jenna N Bates; Alexander W Pastuszak; Mohit Khera
Journal:  Curr Sex Health Rep       Date:  2019-01-19

5.  Cross-sectional study of male sexual function in bariatric patients.

Authors:  Michał R Janik; Ilona Bielecka; Andrzej Kwiatkowski; Piotr E Janik; Thomas Drazba; Jan Bujok; Edward Stanowski; Krzysztof Paśnik
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 1.195

6.  Effect of Single-Session, Cryogen-Cooled Monopolar Radiofrequency Therapy on Sexual Function in Women with Vaginal Laxity: The VIVEVE I Trial.

Authors:  Michael Krychman; Christopher G Rowan; Bruce B Allan; Scott Durbin; Ashley Yacoubian; Deborah Wilkerson
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.681

7.  What is the "weight" of body mass index on sexual functioning in women? A mediation model.

Authors:  Maria Di Nardo; Chiara Conti; Giulia Di Francesco; Giulia Nicolardi; Maria Teresa Guagnano; Piero Porcelli
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 4.652

8.  Male sexual function after weight-loss surgeries in a group of Saudi population.

Authors:  Hossam S El-Tholoth; Abdalatiff K Bedaiwi; Abdulrahman Binjawhar; Ahmed A Almulhem; Khaled K Bedaiwi; Haider Alshurafa; Tarek Alzahrani; Ruyof K Alhussein; Abdulaziz K Alhussein; Mussa Alnumi
Journal:  Urol Ann       Date:  2021-03-04

9.  Sexual Quality of Life, Sexual Knowledge, and Attitudes of Older Adults on the Example of Inhabitants Over 60s of Bialystok, Poland.

Authors:  Mateusz Cybulski; Lukasz Cybulski; Elzbieta Krajewska-Kulak; Magda Orzechowska; Urszula Cwalina; Marek Jasinski
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-11

10.  The effect of bariatric surgery on female sexual function: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Anna Różańska-Walędziak; Paweł Bartnik; Joanna Kacperczyk-Bartnik; Maciej Walędziak; Andrzej Kwiatkowski; Krzysztof Czajkowski
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.