BACKGROUND: Sexual functioning has been shown to be impaired in women who are obese, particularly those seeking bariatric surgery. However, most previous studies evaluating sexual function in these populations have not used validated measures. We used the validated Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) to assess the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in a sample of >100 women evaluated for bariatric surgery. METHODS: The FSFI was administered to reportedly sexually active women during their preoperative evaluation. The scores for the individual FSFI domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain) ranging from 0 (or 1.2) to 6 were summed to produce a FSFI total score (range 2-36). A FSFI total cutoff score of <or=26.55 was used to identify participants with FSD. The participants' FSFI total and domain scores were compared with previously published norms available for women diagnosed with female sexual arousal disorder and healthy controls. RESULTS: Of the 102 women, 61 (59.8%) had FSFI total scores of <or=26.55, indicative of FSD. Older age and menopause were associated with FSD. Compared with published norms, bariatric surgery candidates had FSFI domain scores that were lower than those of the control group (all P values < 0.0001) but greater than those of the female sexual arousal disorder group (all P values < 0.0001), except for desire, for which the scores were similar. CONCLUSION: Women seeking bariatric surgery are clearly a population with substantial sexual function impairment, with 60% of participants reporting FSD. These findings highlight the need to initiate routine assessment of sexual functioning in this population and examine whether the weight loss after bariatric surgery contributes to a reversal of FSD.
BACKGROUND: Sexual functioning has been shown to be impaired in women who are obese, particularly those seeking bariatric surgery. However, most previous studies evaluating sexual function in these populations have not used validated measures. We used the validated Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) to assess the prevalence of female sexual dysfunction (FSD) in a sample of >100 women evaluated for bariatric surgery. METHODS: The FSFI was administered to reportedly sexually active women during their preoperative evaluation. The scores for the individual FSFI domains (desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain) ranging from 0 (or 1.2) to 6 were summed to produce a FSFI total score (range 2-36). A FSFI total cutoff score of <or=26.55 was used to identify participants with FSD. The participants' FSFI total and domain scores were compared with previously published norms available for women diagnosed with female sexual arousal disorder and healthy controls. RESULTS: Of the 102 women, 61 (59.8%) had FSFI total scores of <or=26.55, indicative of FSD. Older age and menopause were associated with FSD. Compared with published norms, bariatric surgery candidates had FSFI domain scores that were lower than those of the control group (all P values < 0.0001) but greater than those of the female sexual arousal disorder group (all P values < 0.0001), except for desire, for which the scores were similar. CONCLUSION:Women seeking bariatric surgery are clearly a population with substantial sexual function impairment, with 60% of participants reporting FSD. These findings highlight the need to initiate routine assessment of sexual functioning in this population and examine whether the weight loss after bariatric surgery contributes to a reversal of FSD.
Authors: A Salonia; R M Munarriz; R Naspro; R E Nappi; A Briganti; R Chionna; F Federghini; V Mirone; P Rigatti; I Goldstein; F Montorsi Journal: BJU Int Date: 2004-05 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Ronette L Kolotkin; Martin Binks; Ross D Crosby; Truls Østbye; Richard E Gress; Ted D Adams Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Ronette L Kolotkin; Ross D Crosby; Robert Pendleton; Michael Strong; Richard E Gress; Ted Adams Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Truls Ostbye; Ronette L Kolotkin; Hong He; Francine Overcash; Rebecca Brouwer; Martin Binks; Karen L Syrjala; Kishore M Gadde Journal: J Sex Marital Ther Date: 2011
Authors: E Maseroli; E Fanni; M Fambrini; B Ragghianti; E Limoncin; E Mannucci; M Maggi; L Vignozzi Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: David B Sarwer; Jacqueline C Spitzer; Thomas A Wadden; Raymond C Rosen; James E Mitchell; Kathy Lancaster; Anita Courcoulas; William Gourash; Nicholas J Christian Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2013-07-12 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Dale S Bond; Rena R Wing; Sivamainthan Vithiananthan; Harry C Sax; G Dean Roye; Beth A Ryder; Dieter Pohl; Jeannine Giovanni Journal: Surg Obes Relat Dis Date: 2010-06-04 Impact factor: 4.734
Authors: Alexandra Hanlon; William Small; Jonathan Strauss; Lilie L Lin; Laura Hanisch; Liming Huang; Jinbing Bai; Jessica Wells; Deborah Watkins Bruner Journal: Cancer Nurs Date: 2018 May/Jun Impact factor: 2.592