Literature DB >> 16647927

Mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy with and without concomitant hysterectomy.

Jennifer M Wu1, Ellen C Wells, Andrew F Hundley, Annamarie Connolly, Kathryn S Williams, Anthony G Visco.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine risk factors for mesh erosion, including concomitant hysterectomy, in abdominal sacral colpopexies. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 313 women who underwent an abdominal sacral colpopexy. Data regarding patient demographics, operative techniques, length of follow-up, postoperative complications, and mesh erosion were collected.
RESULTS: Of 313 subjects, 101 (32.3%) had concomitant hysterectomies and 212 (67.7%) had had previous hysterectomies. The overall rate of mesh erosion was 5.4%. In bivariate analysis, concomitant hysterectomy was not associated with erosion (6.9% vs 4.7% previous hysterectomy, P = .42); however, estrogen therapy was an effect modifier. In women on estrogen, hysterectomy (OR 4.9, CI 1.2-19.7) and anterior imbrication (OR 5.6, CI 1.1-28.6) were associated with mesh erosion. No risk factors were identified in women not on estrogen.
CONCLUSION: In women on estrogen therapy, hysterectomy was associated with mesh erosion in abdominal sacral colpopexy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16647927     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.01.051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  18 in total

1.  Natural orifice vaginal sacrocolpopexy (NOVaS): a cadaver feasibility study.

Authors:  Karen L Noblett; Miles Murphy; Nathan Guerette
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 2.  Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of using mesh in surgery for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Authors:  Xueli Jia; Cathryn Glazener; Graham Mowatt; David Jenkinson; Cynthia Fraser; Christine Bain; Jennifer Burr
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Complications of pelvic organ prolapse surgery and methods of prevention.

Authors:  Renaud de Tayrac; Loic Sentilhes
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Ke Pan; Lili Cao; Nicholas A Ryan; Yanzhou Wang; Huicheng Xu
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic mesh sacrocolpopexy.

Authors:  Jason P Gilleran; Matthew Johnson; Andrew Hundley
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2010-10

6.  Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy with transcervical morcellation and sacrocervicopexy for the treatment of uterine prolapse.

Authors:  Sybil G Dessie; Michele Park; Peter L Rosenblatt
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 7.  Sacrocolpopexy: Surgical Technique, Outcomes, and Complications.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Takacs; Karl J Kreder
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.092

8.  A rat hysteropexy model for evaluating adhesion formation and comparison of two different structured meshes.

Authors:  Ayse Filiz Gokmen-Karasu; Serdar Aydin; Fatma Cavide Sonmez; Ilknur Adanir; Gulsah Ilhan; Seda Ates
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 2.894

9.  Trends in use of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Michele Jonsson Funk; Autumn L Edenfield; Virginia Pate; Anthony G Visco; Alison C Weidner; Jennifer M Wu
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Vaginal repair with mesh versus colporrhaphy for prolapse: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Carey; P Higgs; J Goh; J Lim; A Leong; H Krause; A Cornish
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.