AIM: To structure the rate of intraoperative complications that requires an intraoperative or perioperative resolution. METHODS: We perform a literature review of Medline database. The research was focused on intraoperative laparoscopic procedures inside the field of urological oncology. General rate of perioperative complications in laparoscopic urologic surgery is described to be around 12.4%. Most of the manuscripts published do not make differences between pure intraoperative, intraoperative with postoperative consequences and postoperative complications. RESULTS: We expose a narrative statement of complications, possible solutions and possible preventions for most frequent retroperitoneal and pelvic laparoscopic surgery. We expose the results with the following order: retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery (radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy and adrenalectomy) and pelvic laparoscopic surgery (radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative complications vary from different series. More scheduled reports should be done in order to better understand the real rates of complications.
AIM: To structure the rate of intraoperative complications that requires an intraoperative or perioperative resolution. METHODS: We perform a literature review of Medline database. The research was focused on intraoperative laparoscopic procedures inside the field of urological oncology. General rate of perioperative complications in laparoscopic urologic surgery is described to be around 12.4%. Most of the manuscripts published do not make differences between pure intraoperative, intraoperative with postoperative consequences and postoperative complications. RESULTS: We expose a narrative statement of complications, possible solutions and possible preventions for most frequent retroperitoneal and pelvic laparoscopic surgery. We expose the results with the following order: retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery (radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy and adrenalectomy) and pelvic laparoscopic surgery (radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy). CONCLUSION: Intraoperative complications vary from different series. More scheduled reports should be done in order to better understand the real rates of complications.
Authors: Massimiliano Spaliviero; Andrew P Steinberg; Jihad H Kaouk; Mihir M Desai; Warren C Hammert; Inderbir S Gill Journal: Urology Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Octavio A Castillo; Sidney C Abreu; Mirandolino B Mariano; Marcos V Tefilli; Jorge Hoyos; Ivan Pinto; Joao B Cerqueira; Lucio F Gonzaga; Gilvan N Fonseca Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2006 May-Jun Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Ioannis M Varkarakis; Mohamad E Allaf; Sam B Bhayani; Takeshi Inagaki; Li M Su; Louis R Kavoussi; Thomas W Jarrett Journal: Urology Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Alexei Wedmid; Pierre Mendoza; Saurabh Sharma; Rachel L Hastings; Kelly P Monahan; Mary Walicki; Thomas E Ahlering; James Porter; Erik P Castle; Faisal Ahmed; Jason D Engel; Harold A Frazier; Daniel Eun; David I Lee Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-09-23 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jay K Jhaveri; Frank J Penna; Mireya Diaz-Insua; Wooju Jeong; Mani Menon; James O Peabody Journal: J Endourol Date: 2013-12-10 Impact factor: 2.942
Authors: Alberto Breda; Antonio Finelli; Gunter Janetschek; Francesco Porpiglia; Francesco Montorsi Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2009-01-20 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Danilo Galante Moreno; Cesar Augusto Martins Pereira; Ricardo Kyoiti Sant Anna; Rafael Ulysses de Azevedo; Luiz Felipe Savio; Ricardo Jordão Duarte; Miguel Srougi; Carlo Camargo Passerotti Journal: JSLS Date: 2019 Apr-Jun Impact factor: 2.172