Literature DB >> 17919695

Mechanisms of hemostatic failure during laparoscopic nephrectomy: review of Food and Drug Administration database.

Ryan S Hsi1, Daniel T Saint-Elie, Grenith J Zimmerman, D Duane Baldwin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the complications with endovascular stapling devices, nonlocking titanium clips, and nonabsorbable polymer ligating (Hem-o-lok) clips during laparoscopic nephrectomy.
METHODS: The Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database was retrospectively reviewed for reports dated from January 1992 to March 2006 using the key words "nephrectomy" and "kidney." All episodes of pure and hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy were evaluated.
RESULTS: Of 2172 total nephrectomy or kidney-related reports, 352 reported failure using laparoscopic hemostatic devices to secure the renal vasculature, and 223 complications (63%) resulted during the use of endovascular stapling devices, 111 (33%) from nonlocking titanium clips and 18 (5%) from locking clips. The leading causes of failure reported in stapling devices were staple line malformation (47%) and locking up (29%). In titanium clips, jamming/feeding difficulties (27%) and trouble closing or "scissoring" clips (26%) were the most common. In locking clips, dislodgement (44%) was most frequently reported. Three, one, and three deaths were reported after the use of the stapling device, titanium clip, and locking clip device, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: All three methods used to secure the renal hilum in laparoscopic nephrectomy can result in malfunction. Because the overall denominator of use is not known, it would be inappropriate to conclude that one device is safer than another. When they occurred, these device malfunctions were potentially serious. Knowledge of the possible mechanisms of failure seen with each device could allow surgeons to anticipate potential complications and, therefore, perform laparoscopic surgery more safely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17919695     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.06.1116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

1.  [Comparison of efficacy and safety between two different methods of nephroureterectomy in two centers].

Authors:  J F Wu; R C Lin; Y C Lin; W H Cai; Q G Zhu; D Fang; G Y Xiong; L Zhang; L Q Zhou; L F Ye; X S Li
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2019-08-18

2.  Intraoperative laparoscopic complications for urological cancer procedures.

Authors:  Sergio Fernández-Pello Montes; Ivan Gonzalez Rodríguez; Rodrigo Gil Ugarteburu; Luis Rodríguez Villamil; Begoña Diaz Mendez; Patricio Suarez Gil; Javier Mosquera Madera
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2015-05-16       Impact factor: 1.337

3.  Laparoscopic pretransplant nephrectomy with morcellation in autosomic-dominant polycystic kidney disease patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Anastasios D Asimakopoulos; Richard Gaston; Roberto Miano; Filippo Annino; Camille Mugnier; Lorenzo Dutto; Giuseppe Vespasiani; Enrico Spera; Jean-Luc Hoepffner; Thierry Piechaud
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  [Nephrectomy: complication management].

Authors:  S Pahernik; C Bergsträßer; D Teber; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Retrospective Comparison of Clinical and Economic Outcomes of Non-Donor Patients Undergoing Radical Nephrectomy Using One of Two Different Linear Stapler Technologies for Transection of the Renal Vessels: Fixed-Height Gripping Surface Reloads vs Variable-Height Reloads.

Authors:  Stephen S Johnston; Barbara H Johnson; Divya Chakke; Sanjoy Roy; Philippe Grange; Esther Pollack
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2022-09-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.