| Literature DB >> 25983840 |
Dong Am Park1, Seok Won Kim1, Sung Myung Lee1, Chang Il Ju1, Chong Gue Kim1, Suk Jung Jang1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Screw fixation via the paraspinal muscle sparing approach and by percutaneous screw fixation are known to diminish the risk of complications, such as, iatrogenic muscle injury as compared with the conventional midline approach. The purpose of this study was to evaluate tissue injury markers after these less traumatic screw fixation techniques for the treatment of L4-L5 spondylolisthesis.Entities:
Keywords: Paraspinal muscle sparing approach; Percutaneous screw fixation; Tissue injury
Year: 2012 PMID: 25983840 PMCID: PMC4430557 DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2012.9.4.321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Spine ISSN: 1738-2262
Fig. 1Intraoperative photographs of screw fixation via paraspinal muscle sparing approach. (A) Through a midline skin incision, the spinal processes, laminae, and facet joints were exposed. (B) Following decompression and discectomy, two titanium cages are inserted into the intervertebral space. (C) Paramedian fascial incision are made in 2-3 cm lateral to midline and screws are inserted via the paraspinal muscle sparing approach between longissimus and multifidus muscle. (D) Postoperative skin incision shows single midline incision.
Patients demographics and backgrounds
Fig. 2Serum creatinine kinase (CK-MM) concentrations for both groups. The Group II shows lower level of CK-MM than the Group I significantly on postoperative 1 day and 3 days after surgery. The CK-MM concentrations of the both group were returned to baseline after 7 days.
Fig. 3Serum TNNC2 concentrations for the Group II show lower level than the Group I significantly on postoperative 1 day and 3 days (p<0.05). They returned to baseline after 7 days.
Fig. 4Serum IL-8 concentrations. Although IL-8 level increased more rapidly in Group I than in Group II, it was not significantly different at any time.