Literature DB >> 10842484

Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle thickness after various lumbar back surgery procedures.

H Suwa1, J Hanakita, N Ohshita, K Gotoh, N Matsuoka, A Morizane.   

Abstract

Damage to the paraspinal muscle after various lumbar back surgery procedures was evaluated by measuring the paraspinal muscle thickness preoperatively and postoperatively in 89 patients, 61 males and 28 females. There were 42 single interlaminar level procedures (SL group), 13 multiple interlaminar level procedures (ML group), and 34 posterolateral fusion procedures (PLF group). Changes in paraspinal muscle thickness were evaluated at more than 10 months after surgery, because muscle swelling continued as long as 10 months after surgery, and then reduced as the edema subsided. Postoperative serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level on postoperative day 2 was also measured. The decrease of paraspinal muscle thickness was significantly larger in the PLF group than in the SL group (-12.9% and -2.7%, respectively, p < 0.02). There was no significant correlation between postoperative serum CPK level and decrease of paraspinal muscle thickness. However, the postoperative elevation of serum CPK level was significantly higher in the PLF group than in the SL and ML groups (979 +/- 114 vs. 292 +/- 45 and 410 +/- 44 IU/l, respectively, p < 0.001). In conclusion, posterolateral fusion is the most invasive procedure of the paraspinal muscles in various lumbar back surgery procedures. Paraspinal muscle damage during lumbar back surgery may be one of the most important factors that causes atrophy of the muscles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10842484     DOI: 10.2176/nmc.40.151

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo)        ISSN: 0470-8105            Impact factor:   1.742


  28 in total

1.  Comparison of open versus percutaneous pedicle screw insertion in a sheep model.

Authors:  W Lehmann; A Ushmaev; A Ruecker; J Nuechtern; L Grossterlinden; P G Begemann; T Baeumer; J M Rueger; D Briem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Multifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion: minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach.

Authors:  ShunWu Fan; ZhiJun Hu; FengDong Zhao; Xing Zhao; Yue Huang; Xiangqian Fang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-10-30       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Comparison of pedicle fixation by the Wiltse approach and the conventional posterior open approach for thoracolumbar fractures, using MRI, histological and electrophysiological analyses of the multifidus muscle.

Authors:  Liu Junhui; Pang Zhengbao; Xu Wenbin; Hao Lu; Li Shengyun; Fan Shunwu; Zhao Fengdong
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Magnetic resonance imaging-based anatomical study of the multifidus-longissimus cleavage planes in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Haijun Li; Lei Yang; Jinhua Chen; Hao Xie; Weizhong Tian; Xiaojian Cao
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

5.  Postoperative rehabilitation does not improve functional outcome in lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective study with 2-year postoperative follow-up.

Authors:  Timo J Aalto; Ville Leinonen; Arto Herno; Markku Alen; Heikki Kröger; Veli Turunen; Sakari Savolainen; Tapani Saari; Olavi Airaksinen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  The quantitative analysis of back muscle degeneration after posterior lumbar fusion: comparison of minimally invasive and conventional open surgery.

Authors:  Sang-Hyuk Min; Myung-Ho Kim; Joong-Bae Seo; Jee-Young Lee; Dae-Hee Lee
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2009-12-31

7.  Postoperative changes in paraspinal muscle volume: comparison between paramedian interfascial and midline approaches for lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Seung Jae Hyun; Young Baeg Kim; Yang Soo Kim; Seung Won Park; Taek Kyun Nam; Hyun Jong Hong; Jeong Taik Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Does minimally invasive lumbar disc surgery result in less muscle injury than conventional surgery? A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Mark Arts; Ronald Brand; Bas van der Kallen; Geert Lycklama à Nijeholt; Wilco Peul
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Benefits of the paraspinal muscle-sparing approach versus the conventional midline approach for posterior nonfusion stabilization: comparative analysis of clinical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Neel Anand; Eli M Baron; Robert S Bray
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2007-08-01

10.  Back muscle changes after pedicle based dynamic stabilization.

Authors:  Kyung Yun Moon; Soo-Eon Lee; Ki-Jeong Kim; Seung-Jae Hyun; Hyun-Jib Kim; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-03-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.