Literature DB >> 25983052

Parents' Perspectives on Variants of Uncertain Significance from Chromosome Microarray Analysis.

Lesli A Kiedrowski1,2, Kailey M Owens3, Beverly M Yashar4, Jane L Schuette3.   

Abstract

Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) for unexplained anomalies and developmental delay has improved diagnosis rates, but results classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS) may challenge both clinicians and families. We explored the impact of such results on families, including parental knowledge, understanding and interpretation. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with parents (N = 14) who received genetic counseling for a VUS in their child. Transcripts were analyzed through an iterative coding process. Participants demonstrated a range of recall and personal interpretation regarding whether test results provided a causal explanation for their children's health issues. Participants maintained contradictory interpretations, describing results as answers while maintaining that little clarification of their child's condition had been provided. Reported benefits included obtaining medical services and personal validation. Parents described adaptation/coping processes similar to those occurring after positive test results. Recall of terminology, including "VUS" and precise CMA abnormalities, was poor. However, most demonstrated conceptual understanding of scientific uncertainty. All participants expressed intentions to return for recommended genetics follow-up but had misconceptions about how this would occur. These results provide insight into the patient-and-family experience when receiving uncertain genomic findings, emphasize the importance of exploring uncertainty during the communication process, and highlight areas for potential attention or improvement in the clinical encounter.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chromosomal microarray; Genetic counseling; Genetic testing; Qualitative; Uncertainty

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25983052     DOI: 10.1007/s10897-015-9847-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  23 in total

1.  Uncertainty and perceived personal control among parents of children with rare chromosome conditions: the role of genetic counseling.

Authors:  Shawn E Lipinski; Michael J Lipinski; Leslie G Biesecker; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet       Date:  2006-11-15       Impact factor: 3.908

2.  Annotating DNA variants is the next major goal for human genetics.

Authors:  Garry R Cutting
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  What is a meaningful result? Disclosing the results of genomic research in autism to research participants.

Authors:  Fiona Alice Miller; Robin Zoe Hayeems; Jessica Peace Bytautas
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-17       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Why do we need a diagnosis? A qualitative study of parents' experiences, coping and needs, when the newborn child is severely disabled.

Authors:  A H Graungaard; L Skov
Journal:  Child Care Health Dev       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.508

6.  A place for genetic uncertainty: parents valuing an unknown in the meaning of disease.

Authors:  Ian Whitmarsh; Arlene M Davis; Debra Skinner; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Patient compliance based on genetic medicine: a literature review.

Authors:  Kai Insa Schneider; Jörg Schmidtke
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-08-10

8.  New "first families": the psychosocial impact of new genetic technologies.

Authors:  Joanna H Fanos
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  "What does it mean?": uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Marian Reiff; Barbara A Bernhardt; Surabhi Mulchandani; Danielle Soucier; Diana Cornell; Reed E Pyeritz; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  How do research participants perceive "uncertainty" in genome sequencing?

Authors:  Barbara B Biesecker; William Klein; Katie L Lewis; Tyler C Fisher; Martha Frances Wright; Leslie G Biesecker; Paul K Han
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  20 in total

1.  Impacts of variants of uncertain significance on parental perceptions of children after prenatal chromosome microarray testing.

Authors:  Preeya Desai; Hannah Haber; Jessica Bulafka; Amita Russell; Rebecca Clifton; Julia Zachary; Seonjoo Lee; Tianshu Feng; Ronald Wapner; Catherine Monk; Wendy K Chung
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 3.050

2.  Attitudes, knowledge and consequences of uncertain genetic findings in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Authors:  Charlotte Burns; Laura Yeates; Catherine Spinks; Christopher Semsarian; Jodie Ingles
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 3.  Patients' views on variants of uncertain significance across indications.

Authors:  Kristin Clift; Sarah Macklin; Colin Halverson; Jennifer B McCormick; Abd Moain Abu Dabrh; Stephanie Hines
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2019-08-20

4.  Diagnostic and Therapeutic Misconception: Parental Expectations and Perspectives Regarding Genetic Testing for Developmental Disorders.

Authors:  Isabelle Tremblay; Steffany Grondin; Anne-Marie Laberge; Dominique Cousineau; Lionel Carmant; Anita Rowan; Annie Janvier
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-01

5.  "Something Extra on Chromosome 5": Parents' Understanding of Positive Prenatal Chromosomal Microarray Analysis (CMA) Results.

Authors:  Sarah A Walser; Allison Werner-Lin; Amita Russell; Ronald J Wapner; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Detection of copy number variants using chromosomal microarray analysis for the prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart defects with normal karyotype.

Authors:  Tingting Song; Shanning Wan; Yu Li; Ying Xu; Yinghui Dang; Yunyun Zheng; Chunyan Li; Jiao Zheng; Biliang Chen; Jianfang Zhang
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  "My Plate is Full": Reasons for Declining a Genetic Evaluation of Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Marci M Lesperance; Erin Winkler; Tori L Melendez; Beverly M Yashar
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Challenges to informed consent for exome sequencing: A best-worst scaling experiment.

Authors:  Rachel H Gore; John F P Bridges; Julie S Cohen; Barbara B Biesecker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.717

9.  Hope versus reality: Parent expectations of genomic testing.

Authors:  Katherine E Donohue; Siobhan M Dolan; Dana Watnick; Katie M Gallagher; Jacqueline A Odgis; Sabrina A Suckiel; Nehama Teitelman; Bruce D Gelb; Eimear E Kenny; Melissa P Wasserstein; Carol R Horowitz; Laurie J Bauman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-01-29

10.  Known unknowns: building an ethics of uncertainty into genomic medicine.

Authors:  Ainsley J Newson; Samantha J Leonard; Alison Hall; Clara L Gaff
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 3.063

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.