Literature DB >> 30284667

Diagnostic and Therapeutic Misconception: Parental Expectations and Perspectives Regarding Genetic Testing for Developmental Disorders.

Isabelle Tremblay1, Steffany Grondin2, Anne-Marie Laberge3, Dominique Cousineau4, Lionel Carmant5, Anita Rowan6, Annie Janvier7.   

Abstract

Parents' understanding/expectations regarding genetic testing for children with developmental disorders were explored. Within a month of testing, interviews were conducted with 57 parents. Many (74%) could not recall the nature of testing. Parents expected genetic testing to have positive impacts for the child (93%) and the family (98%), mainly to find the etiology and/or an intervention. Many parents (40%) reported not knowing their child's clinical diagnosis. They expected genetic testing would establish the diagnosis. Parents anticipated potential negative impacts of testing for children (78%) and families (87%), mainly finding another illness or not finding potential interventions. Abnormal results explaining the disorder were found in 9% of children. In summary, genetic results for developmental disorders are unlikely to meet parental expectations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH); Autism spectrum disorder; Chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing; Genetic testing; Global developmental delay; Misconception

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30284667     DOI: 10.1007/s10803-018-3768-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord        ISSN: 0162-3257


  37 in total

Review 1.  Evidence report: Genetic and metabolic testing on children with global developmental delay: report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of the Child Neurology Society.

Authors:  D J Michelson; M I Shevell; E H Sherr; J B Moeschler; A L Gropman; S Ashwal
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  The role of new genetic technology in investigating autism and developmental delay.

Authors:  Natasha Shur; Shelly Gunn; Lloyd Feit; Albert K Oh; Yvette Yatchmink; Dianne Abuelo
Journal:  Med Health R I       Date:  2011-05

3.  Obtaining a genetic diagnosis in a child with disability: impact on parental quality of life.

Authors:  M Lingen; L Albers; M Borchers; S Haass; J Gärtner; S Schröder; L Goldbeck; R von Kries; K Brockmann; B Zirn
Journal:  Clin Genet       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 4.438

4.  Social disadvantage and developmental diagnosis in pre-schoolers.

Authors:  Norma Kayrouz; Susan L Milne; Jenny L McDonald
Journal:  J Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 1.954

5.  Paternal versus maternal coping styles with child diagnosis of developmental delay.

Authors:  Yael Barak-Levy; Na'ama Atzaba-Poria
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2013-04-11

6.  The utility of chromosomal microarray analysis in developmental and behavioral pediatrics.

Authors:  Arthur L Beaudet
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2013-01-11

7.  The impact of chromosomal microarray on clinical management: a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Lindsay B Henderson; Carolyn D Applegate; Elizabeth Wohler; Molly B Sheridan; Julie Hoover-Fong; Denise A S Batista
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Array-based technology and recommendations for utilization in medical genetics practice for detection of chromosomal abnormalities.

Authors:  Melanie Manning; Louanne Hudgins
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  Autism genetic testing: a qualitative study of awareness, attitudes, and experiences among parents of children with autism spectrum disorders.

Authors:  Lei-Shih Chen; Lei Xu; Tse-Yang Huang; Shweta U Dhar
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  American College of Medical Genetics guideline on the cytogenetic evaluation of the individual with developmental delay or mental retardation.

Authors:  Lisa G Shaffer
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2005 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  2 in total

1.  Hope versus reality: Parent expectations of genomic testing.

Authors:  Katherine E Donohue; Siobhan M Dolan; Dana Watnick; Katie M Gallagher; Jacqueline A Odgis; Sabrina A Suckiel; Nehama Teitelman; Bruce D Gelb; Eimear E Kenny; Melissa P Wasserstein; Carol R Horowitz; Laurie J Bauman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2021-01-29

Review 2.  Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Decision-Making: The READ Model.

Authors:  Iona Novak; Anna Te Velde; Ashleigh Hines; Emma Stanton; Maria Mc Namara; Madison C B Paton; Megan Finch-Edmondson; Catherine Morgan
Journal:  Front Rehabil Sci       Date:  2021-10-05
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.