| Literature DB >> 25982058 |
Ying Chen1, Zuxiong Huang2,3, Di Ma4, Liqian Chen5, Qintao Lai6, Xuan Huang7, Jia Zhou8, Xiaoyong Zhang9, Qiang Ma10, Zhengliang Chen11, Daming Zuo12,13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scavenger receptor A (SRA) is expressed predominantly in phagocytic cells playing an essential role in the host immune defense against invading microorganisms. Our previous study reported the presence of SRA in a soluble form in patients with infection of hepatitis B viruses (HBV). However, the association of soluble SRA with stages of HBV infection and the immune response induced by HBV is not fully determined.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25982058 PMCID: PMC4434833 DOI: 10.1186/s12865-015-0088-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Immunol ISSN: 1471-2172 Impact factor: 3.615
Clinical characteristics of subjects in cross sectional study
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 22 | 28 | 29 | 33 |
| Gender(M/F) | 12/10 | 10/18 | 18/11 | 19/14 |
| Age(year) | 25.0 (22.2-33.8) | 26.0 (17.4-36.2) | 27.0 (22.0-38.0) | 33.0 (22.0-43.8) |
| HBV-DNA(log10 copies/mL) | n.d. | 8.00 (6.41-9.30) | 7.98 (6.57-9.02) | <3 |
| ALT(U/L) | 14.5 (8.3-27.9) | 26.0(15.6-35.0) | 104.2(60.6-214.0) | 19(12–30.8) |
| HBsAg positive | 0 | 28 | 29 | 33 |
| Anti-HBs positive | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| HBeAg positive | 0 | 28 | 29 | 0 |
| Anti-HBe positive | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33 |
| Anti-HBc positive | 0 | 28 | 29 | 33 |
Data are shown as median (10–90% percentile).
ALT, alanine aminotransferase; CHB, chronic hepatitis B; HC, healthy control; IC, inactive carrier; IT, immune tolerant;
HBsAg, hepatitis B surface (HBs) antigen; HBeAg, hepatitis B e antigen; n.d., not determined.
Figure 1Cross-sectional analysis of the soluble SRA level in patients with hepatitis B virus. (A) Comparison of serum soluble SRA concentrations in healthy controls (HC) (n = 22), subjects in the immune tolerance (IT) (n = 28) and inactive carrier (IC) (n = 33) stages of a chronic HBV infection, and patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B (CHB) (n = 29). (B) The relationship of serum soluble SRA concentration with HBV DNA in patients with HBV DNA above 1000 copies/mL (n = 48). (C) The relationship of serum soluble SRA concentration in CHB patients (n = 29) with alanine transaminase (ALT) levels. (D) Serum SRA concentrations at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks after starting telbivudine therapy in 6 patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B.
Clinical characteristics of the subjects with telbivudine therapy (n = 6)
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | 0 | 12 | 24 |
| HBV-DNA(log10 copies/mL) | 8.64 (6.84-9.18) | 5.06 (3.30-6.09) | 3.86 (2.46-5.38) |
| ALT(U/L) | 63.0 (15.0-147.0) | 31.0 (21.0-79.0) | 29.0 (17.0-51.0) |
| TBil (μmol/L) | 14.4 (5.5-14.9) | 14.8 (7.7-27.7) | 18.4 (6.5-25.4) |
| SRA(ng/mL) | 10.4 (9.3-21.2) | 16.19 (8.7-19.8) | 7.6 (4.2-9.7) |
Data are shown as median (10–90% percentile). TBil, total serum bilirubin.
Figure 2SRA-ECD protein suppressed HBV antigen induced CD8+ T cell responses. (A) Recombinant SRA-ECD protein was prepared using the pET expression system, then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting with anti-SRA antibody. (B) PBMCs from CHB patients were stimulated with HBV core peptides, and subjected to intracellular cytokine staining assays. The percentages of HBV peptide-induced cytokine-producing CD8+ T cells were calculated. Representative dot plots from three independent experiments are shown. GST protein prepared by the same procedure was used as an unrelated protein control. The inhibited percentages were calculated and summarized (C).
Figure 3SRA-ECD protein binds to T cells from CHB patients more efficiently. Whole blood from healthy controls and CHB patients was analyzed for SRA-ECD binding with antibodies for CD3 after red blood cell lysis (A). Summaries of 15 healthy controls and 28 CHB patients are shown (B).
Figure 4SRA-ECD protein inhibits T cell proliferation and cytokine production. (A, B) T cells purified from human PBMCs were stimulated with anti-CD3 (1 μg/mL) and anti-CD28 (1 μg/mL) antibodies in the presence of the indicated concentration of SRA-ECD protein for 72 hr. T cell proliferation was assessed by FACS analysis of CD3+ T cells based on the dilution of CFSE intensity. Histograms are representative of two independent experiments (A). Supernatants were collected after 48 h and assayed for IL-2, IFN-γ and IL-4 using ELISA (B). (C) Naïve T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies for 72 hr. Then the cells were re-stimulated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies in the absence (medium) or presence of different concentration of SRA-ECD protein for 6 hours and subjected to intracellular cytokine staining assays. The percentages of IFN-γ-producing CD3+ T cells were calculated. Representative dot plots from two independent experiments are shown. (D) CFSE-labeled naïve T cells were stimulated in plates coated with anti-CD3 anxd anti-CD28 antibodies in the absence or presence of 10 μg/mL of SRA-ECD protein. After 72 h, T cells were stained for CD3, CD4 and CD8 respectively. T-cell proliferation was assessed by FACS analysis based on the dilution of CFSE intensity. Histograms are representative of three independent experiments. (E) Human PBMCs were activated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies co-stimulation for 48 h, and cells with and without stimulation were analyzed for SRA-ECD binding together with antibodies for CD3. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 5Impaired T proliferation by SRA-ECD could be reverted by IL-2. (A) CFSE-labeled naïve T cells were stimulated with immobilized anti-CD3 (0.5 μg/mL) and anti-CD28 (0.5 μg/mL) antibodies or anti-CD3/28 plus SRA-ECD in the presence or absence of recombinant IL-2 (100 U/mL). After 72 h, cells were stained for CD3, and proliferation and cell death induction was determined for CD3+ T cells. The data are representative of one experiment among three independent experiments. (B) Purified T cells were activated on plates coated with anti-CD3 and anti-CD28 antibodies in the absence or presence of SRA-ECD protein. Phosphorylation of ZAP-70 was determined by western blot analysis at different time points. GAPDH was used as a loading control. Immunoblot bands were quantified by densitometry analysis using ImageJ software. The data are presented as ratio of protein expression compared with GAPDH expression for each sample. The result presented is from one representative experiment among two independent experiments. N.S. stands for not statistically significant.