Literature DB >> 18767628

Compositional and functional stability of arthropod communities in the face of ant invasions.

Paul D Krushelnycky1, Rosemary G Gillespie.   

Abstract

There is a general consensus that the diversity of a biotic community can have an influence on its stability, but the strength, ubiquity, and relative importance of this effect is less clear. In the context of biological invasions, diversity has usually been studied in terms of its effect on a community's invasibility, but diversity may also influence stability by affecting the magnitude of compositional or functional changes experienced by a community upon invasion. We examined the impacts of invasive ants on arthropod communities at five natural area sites in the Hawaiian Islands, and assessed whether differences among sites in community diversity and density variables were related to measures of stability. Ant invasion was usually associated with significant changes in overall community composition, as measured by Bray-Curtis distances, particularly among endemic subsets of the communities. Changes in mean species richness were also strong at three of the five sites. Among sites, diversity was negatively related to stability as measured by resistance to overall compositional change, but this effect could not be separated from the strong negative effect of invasive ant density on compositional stability. When compositional stability was measured as proportional change in richness, the best predictor of stability among endemic community subsets was endemic richness, with richer communities losing proportionately more species than species-poor communities. This effect was highly significant even after controlling for differences in invasive ant density and suggested that communities that had already lost many endemic species were resistant to further species loss upon ant invasion, while more intact communities remained vulnerable to species loss. Communities underwent strong but idiosyncratic functional shifts in association with ant invasion, both in terms of trophic structure and total arthropod biomass. There were no apparent relationships, however, between functional stability and community diversity or density measures. Instead, invasive ant density was the best among-site predictor of the magnitude of functional change. Overall, diversity appeared to be a poor predictor of stability in the face of ant invasion in these communities, possibly because any actual diversity effects were overshadowed by community-specific factors and variation in the magnitude of the ant-mediated perturbation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18767628     DOI: 10.1890/07-1293.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  5 in total

1.  Different acute toxicity of fipronil baits on invasive Linepithema humile supercolonies and some non-target ground arthropods.

Authors:  Daisuke Hayasaka; Naoki Kuwayama; Azuma Takeo; Takanobu Ishida; Hiroyuki Mano; Maki N Inoue; Takashi Nagai; Francisco Sánchez-Bayo; Koichi Goka; Takuo Sawahata
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2015-05-17       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Island time and the interplay between ecology and evolution in species diversification.

Authors:  Rosemary G Gillespie
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-11-17       Impact factor: 5.183

3.  Foraging connections: Patterns of prey use linked to invasive predator diel movement.

Authors:  Cora A Johnston; Erin E Wilson Rankin; Daniel S Gruner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Genetic diversity is positively associated with fine-scale momentary abundance of an invasive ant.

Authors:  Monica A M Gruber; Benjamin D Hoffmann; Peter A Ritchie; Philip J Lester
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  Evaluating the interacting influences of pollination, seed predation, invasive species and isolation on reproductive success in a threatened alpine plant.

Authors:  Paul D Krushelnycky
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.