Literature DB >> 25979986

Overview of contemporary guidelines in digital pathology: what is available in 2015 and what still needs to be addressed?

Matthew G Hanna1, Liron Pantanowitz2, Andrew J Evans3.   

Abstract

As technological advancements continue to transform the practice of pathology, new adopters of these technologies will look to guidelines on how best to incorporate them with an eye to preserving and enhancing patient safety and diagnostic quality. Telepathology, using a variety of digital pathology modalities, has tremendous potential to achieve that goal. Pathology departments are increasingly looking to implement different digital pathology platforms, whole slide imaging (WSI) systems in particular, for a broad range of applications in patient care. WSI allows for the acquisition, management and review of completely digitised slides as would be done with a light microscope. WSI also facilitates image analysis that cannot be carried out by a pathologist using traditional microscopy. Over the last few years, the Digital Pathology Association, The Royal College of Pathologists, College of American Pathologists, Canadian Association of Pathologists, the American Telemedicine Association and the Society of Toxicologic Pathology have published guidelines for validating and implementing digital pathology systems. This review summarises, compares and contrasts these published guidelines and discusses pertinent issues that need to be addressed as the guidelines are revised in the future. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIAGNOSTICS; DIGITAL PATHOLOGY; QUALITY ASSURANCE; TELEPATHOLOGY

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979986     DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2015-202914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  14 in total

1.  Performance of residents using digital images versus glass slides on certification examination in anatomical pathology: a mixed methods pilot study.

Authors:  Lorna Mirham; Christopher Naugler; Malcolm Hayes; Nadia Ismiil; Annie Belisle; Shachar Sade; Catherine Streutker; Christina MacMillan; Golnar Rasty; Snezana Popovic; Mariamma Joseph; Manal Gabril; Penny Barnes; Richard G Hegele; Beverley Carter; George M Yousef
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2016-02-25

2.  Technical and Diagnostic Issues in Whole Slide Imaging Published Validation Studies.

Authors:  Paola Chiara Rizzo; Ilaria Girolami; Stefano Marletta; Liron Pantanowitz; Pietro Antonini; Matteo Brunelli; Nicola Santonicco; Paola Vacca; Nicola Tumino; Lorenzo Moretta; Anil Parwani; Swati Satturwar; Albino Eccher; Enrico Munari
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Verification and Validation of Digital Pathology (Whole Slide Imaging) for Primary Histopathological Diagnosis: All Wales Experience.

Authors:  M Babawale; A Gunavardhan; J Walker; T Corfield; P Huey; A Savage; A Bansal; M Atkinson; H Abdelsalam; E Raweily; A Christian; I Evangelou; D Thomas; J Shannon; E Youd; P Brumwell; J Harrison; I Thompson; M Rashid; G Leopold; A Finall; S Roberts; D Housa; P Nedeva; A Davies; D Fletcher; Muhammad Aslam
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-01-23

4.  The significance of tumour microarchitectural features in breast cancer prognosis: a digital image analysis.

Authors:  I Roxanis; R Colling; C Kartsonaki; A R Green; E A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 6.466

5.  Utilizing novel telepathology system in preclinical studies and peer review.

Authors:  Gabriel Siegel; Dan Regelman; Robert Maronpot; Moti Rosenstock; Shim-Mo Hayashi; Abraham Nyska
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 1.628

6.  Conventional Microscopical versus Digital Whole-Slide Imaging-Based Diagnosis of Thin-Layer Cervical Specimens: A Validation Study.

Authors:  Odille Bongaerts; Carla Clevers; Marij Debets; Daniëlle Paffen; Lisanne Senden; Kim Rijks; Linda Ruiten; Daisy Sie-Go; Paul J van Diest; Marius Nap
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2018-08-27

7.  Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).

Authors:  Sanjay Mukhopadhyay; Michael D Feldman; Esther Abels; Raheela Ashfaq; Senda Beltaifa; Nicolas G Cacciabeve; Helen P Cathro; Liang Cheng; Kumarasen Cooper; Glenn E Dickey; Ryan M Gill; Robert P Heaton; René Kerstens; Guy M Lindberg; Reenu K Malhotra; James W Mandell; Ellen D Manlucu; Anne M Mills; Stacey E Mills; Christopher A Moskaluk; Mischa Nelis; Deepa T Patil; Christopher G Przybycin; Jordan P Reynolds; Brian P Rubin; Mohammad H Saboorian; Mauricio Salicru; Mark A Samols; Charles D Sturgis; Kevin O Turner; Mark R Wick; Ji Y Yoon; Po Zhao; Clive R Taylor
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 6.394

8.  Validation of Remote Digital Frozen Sections for Cancer and Transplant Intraoperative Services.

Authors:  Luca Cima; Matteo Brunelli; Anil Parwani; Ilaria Girolami; Andrea Ciangherotti; Giulio Riva; Luca Novelli; Francesca Vanzo; Alessandro Sorio; Vito Cirielli; Mattia Barbareschi; Antonietta D'Errico; Aldo Scarpa; Chiara Bovo; Filippo Fraggetta; Liron Pantanowitz; Albino Eccher
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2018-10-09

9.  Will Digital Pathology be as Disruptive as Genomics?

Authors:  Steven N Hart
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2018-07-19

10.  Pitfalls in the use of whole slide imaging for the diagnosis of central nervous system tumors: A pilot study in surgical neuropathology.

Authors:  Melike Pekmezci; Sanem Pinar Uysal; Yelda Orhan; Tarik Tihan; Han Sung Lee
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2016-05-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.