Lorna Mirham1, Christopher Naugler1, Malcolm Hayes1, Nadia Ismiil1, Annie Belisle1, Shachar Sade1, Catherine Streutker1, Christina MacMillan1, Golnar Rasty1, Snezana Popovic1, Mariamma Joseph1, Manal Gabril1, Penny Barnes1, Richard G Hegele1, Beverley Carter1, George M Yousef1. 1. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology (Mirham, Ismiil, Sade, Streutker, MacMillan, Rasty, Hegele, Yousef), University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Naugler), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayes), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC; Department of Pathology and Cellular Biology (Belisle), Université de Montréal, Montréal, Que.; Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine (Popovic), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont.; Department of Pathology (Joseph, Gabril), Western University, London, Ont.; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Barnes), Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS; Department of Pathology (Carter), Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, NL; Department of Laboratory Medicine (Yousef), St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ont.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: It is anticipated that many licensing examination centres for pathology will begin fully digitizing the certification examinations. The objective of our study was to test the feasibility of a fully digital examination and to assess the needs, concerns and expectations of pathology residents in moving from a glass slide-based examination to a fully digital examination. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study that compared, after randomization, the performance of senior residents (postgraduate years 4 and 5) in 7 accredited anatomical pathology training programs across Canada on a pathology examination using either glass slides or digital whole-slide scanned images of the slides. The pilot examination was followed by a post-test survey. In addition, pathology residents from all levels of training were invited to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: A total of 100 residents participated in the pilot examination; 49 were given glass slides instead of digital images. We found no significant difference in examination results between the 2 groups of residents (estimated marginal mean 8.23/12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.72-8.87, for glass slides; 7.84/12, 95% CI 7.28-8.41, for digital slides). In the post-test survey, most of the respondents expressed concerns with the digital examination, including slowly functioning software, blurring and poor detail of images, particularly nuclear features. All of the respondents of the general survey (n = 179) agreed that additional training was required if the examination were to become fully digital. INTERPRETATION: Although the performance of residents completing pathology examinations with glass slides was comparable to that of residents using digital images, our study showed that residents were not comfortable with the digital technology, especially given their current level of exposure to it. Additional training may be needed before implementing a fully digital examination, with consideration for a gradual transition.
BACKGROUND: It is anticipated that many licensing examination centres for pathology will begin fully digitizing the certification examinations. The objective of our study was to test the feasibility of a fully digital examination and to assess the needs, concerns and expectations of pathology residents in moving from a glass slide-based examination to a fully digital examination. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study that compared, after randomization, the performance of senior residents (postgraduate years 4 and 5) in 7 accredited anatomical pathology training programs across Canada on a pathology examination using either glass slides or digital whole-slide scanned images of the slides. The pilot examination was followed by a post-test survey. In addition, pathology residents from all levels of training were invited to participate in an online survey. RESULTS: A total of 100 residents participated in the pilot examination; 49 were given glass slides instead of digital images. We found no significant difference in examination results between the 2 groups of residents (estimated marginal mean 8.23/12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 7.72-8.87, for glass slides; 7.84/12, 95% CI 7.28-8.41, for digital slides). In the post-test survey, most of the respondents expressed concerns with the digital examination, including slowly functioning software, blurring and poor detail of images, particularly nuclear features. All of the respondents of the general survey (n = 179) agreed that additional training was required if the examination were to become fully digital. INTERPRETATION: Although the performance of residents completing pathology examinations with glass slides was comparable to that of residents using digital images, our study showed that residents were not comfortable with the digital technology, especially given their current level of exposure to it. Additional training may be needed before implementing a fully digital examination, with consideration for a gradual transition.
Authors: Keith J Kaplan; Jeanette R Burgess; Glenn D Sandberg; Cris P Myers; Thomas R Bigott; Renata B Greenspan Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Jeffrey L Fine; Dana M Grzybicki; Russell Silowash; Jonhan Ho; John R Gilbertson; Leslie Anthony; Robb Wilson; Anil V Parwani; Sheldon I Bastacky; Jonathan I Epstein; Drazen M Jukic Journal: Hum Pathol Date: 2008-01-30 Impact factor: 3.466