Literature DB >> 25979595

A 16-gene assay to predict recurrence after surgery in localised renal cell carcinoma: development and validation studies.

Brian Rini1, Audrey Goddard2, Dejan Knezevic2, Tara Maddala2, Ming Zhou3, Hakan Aydin4, Steven Campbell5, Paul Elson5, Serge Koscielny6, Margarita Lopatin2, Christer Svedman2, Jean-Francois Martini7, J Andrew Williams7, Virginie Verkarre8, Camelia Radulescu9, Yann Neuzillet9, Isabelle Hemmerlé9, Marc Olivier Timsit10, Athanasios C Tsiatis2, Michael Bonham2, Thierry Lebret9, Arnaud Mejean10, Bernard Escudier6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The likelihood of tumour recurrence after nephrectomy in localised clear cell renal cell carcinoma is well characterised by clinical and pathological parameters. However, these assessments can be improved and personalised by the addition of molecular characteristics of each patient's tumour. We aimed to develop and validate a prognostic multigene signature to improve prediction of recurrence risk in clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
METHODS: In the development stage, we investigated the association between expression of 732 genes, measured by reverse-transcription PCR, and clinical outcome in 942 patients with stage I-III clear cell renal cell carcinoma who had undergone a nephrectomy at the Cleveland Clinic (OH, USA). 516 genes were associated with recurrence-free interval. 11 of these genes were selected by further statistical analyses, and were combined with five reference genes (ie, 16 genes in total), from which a recurrence score algorithm was developed. The recurrence score was then validated in an independent cohort of 626 patients from France with stage I-III clear cell renal cell carcinoma who had also undergone nephrectomy. The association between the recurrence score and the risk of recurrence and cancer-specific survival in the first 5 years after surgery was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression, stratified by tumour stage (stage I vs stage II vs III).
FINDINGS: In our primary univariate analysis, the continuous recurrence score (median 37, IQR 31-45) was significantly associated with recurrence-free interval (hazard ratio 3·91 [95% CI 2·63-5·79] for a 25-unit increase in score, p<0·0001). In multivariable analyses, the recurrence score was significantly associated with the risk of tumour recurrence (hazard ratio per 25-unit increase in the score 3·37 [95% CI 2·23-5·08], p<0·0001) after stratification by stage and adjustment for tumour size, grade, or Leibovich score. The recurrence score was able to identify a clinically significant number of both high-risk stage I and low-risk stage II-III patients. A heterogeneity study on separate samples showed little to no intratumoural variability among the 16 genes.
INTERPRETATION: Our findings validate the recurrence score as a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with stage I-III clear cell renal cell carcinoma, providing a more accurate and individualised risk assessment beyond existing clinical and pathological parameters. FUNDING: Genomic Health Inc and Pfizer Inc.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979595     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70167-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  86 in total

1.  Kidney cancer: Rest ASSUREd, much can be learned from adjuvant studies in renal cancer.

Authors:  David D Chism; W Kimryn Rathmell
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 28.314

2.  ASSURE vs. S-TRAC: conflicting results of adjuvant treatments for kidney cancer in the era of targeted agents and genomics.

Authors:  Camillo Porta; Silvia Chiellino
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

Review 3.  The next 10 years: Challenges for the future and overcoming resistance to targeted therapies for renal cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Daniel Y C Heng
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 4.  Recurrence in Localized Renal Cell Carcinoma: a Systematic Review of Contemporary Data.

Authors:  Jacqueline M Speed; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Toni K Choueiri; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Circulating tumor cells in genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Francesco Massari; Vincenzo Di Nunno; Francesca Comito; Marta Cubelli; Chiara Ciccarese; Roberto Iacovelli; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Rodolfo Montironi; Andrea Ardizzoni
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-11-22

Review 6.  [Why have tyrosine kinase inhibitors failed in the adjuvant situation and do checkpoint inhibitors make more sense?]

Authors:  Susanne Krege
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Is there a role for adjuvant therapy after surgery in "high risk for recurrence" kidney cancer? An update on current concepts.

Authors:  T Sharma; C Tajzler; A Kapoor
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 8.  Adjuvant Therapy Options in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Where Do We Stand?

Authors:  Nieves Martinez Chanza; Abhishek Tripathi; Lauren C Harshman
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2019-05-03

Review 9.  Precision medicine from the renal cancer genome.

Authors:  Yasser Riazalhosseini; Mark Lathrop
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 10.  Molecular profiling of renal cell carcinoma: building a bridge toward clinical impact.

Authors:  Brandon J Manley; Abraham Ari Hakimi
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.309

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.