Literature DB >> 25979011

An adaptive filtered back-projection for photoacoustic image reconstruction.

He Huang1, Gilbert Bustamante1, Ralph Peterson1, Jing Yong Ye1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to develop an improved filtered-back-projection (FBP) algorithm for photoacoustic tomography (PAT), which allows image reconstruction with higher quality compared to images reconstructed through traditional algorithms.
METHODS: A rigorous expression of a weighting function has been derived directly from a photoacoustic wave equation and used as a ramp filter in Fourier domain. The authors' new algorithm utilizes this weighting function to precisely calculate each photoacoustic signal's contribution and then reconstructs the image based on the retarded potential generated from the photoacoustic sources. In addition, an adaptive criterion has been derived for selecting the cutoff frequency of a low pass filter. Two computational phantoms were created to test the algorithm. The first phantom contained five spheres with each sphere having different absorbances. The phantom was used to test the capability for correctly representing both the geometry and the relative absorbed energy in a planar measurement system. The authors also used another phantom containing absorbers of different sizes with overlapping geometry to evaluate the performance of the new method for complicated geometry. In addition, random noise background was added to the simulated data, which were obtained by using an arc-shaped array of 50 evenly distributed transducers that spanned 160° over a circle with a radius of 65 mm. A normalized factor between the neighbored transducers was applied for correcting measurement signals in PAT simulations. The authors assumed that the scanned object was mounted on a holder that rotated over the full 360° and the scans were set to a sampling rate of 20.48 MHz.
RESULTS: The authors have obtained reconstructed images of the computerized phantoms by utilizing the new FBP algorithm. From the reconstructed image of the first phantom, one can see that this new approach allows not only obtaining a sharp image but also showing the correct signal strength of the absorbers. The reconstructed image of the second phantom further demonstrates the capability to form clear images of the spheres with sharp borders in the overlapping geometry. The smallest sphere is clearly visible and distinguishable, even though it is surrounded by two big spheres. In addition, image reconstructions were conducted with randomized noise added to the observed signals to mimic realistic experimental conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors have developed a new FBP algorithm that is capable for reconstructing high quality images with correct relative intensities and sharp borders for PAT. The results demonstrate that the weighting function serves as a precise ramp filter for processing the observed signals in the Fourier domain. In addition, this algorithm allows an adaptive determination of the cutoff frequency for the applied low pass filter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25979011      PMCID: PMC4393415          DOI: 10.1118/1.4915532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  29 in total

1.  Temporal backward projection of optoacoustic pressure transients using fourier transform methods.

Authors:  K P Köstli; M Frenz; H Bebie; H P Weber
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Exact frequency-domain reconstruction for thermoacoustic tomography--II: Cylindrical geometry.

Authors:  Yuan Xu; Minghua Xu; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Quantitative photoacoustic imaging: correcting for heterogeneous light fluence distributions using diffuse optical tomography.

Authors:  Adam Q Bauer; Ralph E Nothdurft; Todd N Erpelding; Lihong V Wang; Joseph P Culver
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 4.  Quantitative spectroscopic photoacoustic imaging: a review.

Authors:  Ben Cox; Jan G Laufer; Simon R Arridge; Paul C Beard
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.170

5.  Optimizing wavelength choice for quantitative optoacoustic imaging using the Cramer-Rao lower bound.

Authors:  Dimple Modgil; Patrick J La Riviére
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2010-11-16       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Universal back-projection algorithm for photoacoustic computed tomography.

Authors:  Minghua Xu; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys       Date:  2005-01-19

7.  Photoacoustic ultrasound (PAUS)--reconstruction tomography.

Authors:  R A Kruger; P Liu; Y R Fang; C R Appledorn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.071

8.  Breast cancer in vivo: contrast enhancement with thermoacoustic CT at 434 MHz-feasibility study.

Authors:  R A Kruger; K D Miller; H E Reynolds; W L Kiser; D R Reinecke; G A Kruger
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Non-invasive whole-body imaging of adult zebrafish with optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Rui Ma; Martin Distel; X Luís Deán-Ben; Vasilis Ntziachristos; Daniel Razansky
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 3.609

10.  Three-dimensional photoacoustic imaging of blood vessels in tissue.

Authors:  C G Hoelen; F F de Mul; R Pongers; A Dekker
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 3.776

View more
  8 in total

1.  Algebraic determination of back-projection operators for optoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Amir Rosenthal
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 2.  Fast photoacoustic imaging systems using pulsed laser diodes: a review.

Authors:  Paul Kumar Upputuri; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Biomed Eng Lett       Date:  2018-03-06

3.  High frame rate photoacoustic imaging at 7000 frames per second using clinical ultrasound system.

Authors:  Kathyayini Sivasubramanian; Manojit Pramanik
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 4.  Photoacoustic Imaging in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine.

Authors:  Binita Shrestha; Frank DeLuna; Mark A Anastasio; Jing Yong Ye; Eric M Brey
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 6.389

5.  3D Monte Carlo simulation of light distribution in mouse brain in quantitative photoacoustic computed tomography.

Authors:  Yuqi Tang; Junjie Yao
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-03

6.  Regularized Iterative Weighted Filtered Back-Projection for Few-View Data Photoacoustic Imaging.

Authors:  Xueyan Liu; Dong Peng
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2016-08-09       Impact factor: 2.238

7.  Two-Dimensional Photoacoustic/Ultrasonic Endoscopic Imaging Based on a Line-Focused Transducer.

Authors:  Weiran Pang; Yongjun Wang; Lili Guo; Bo Wang; Puxiang Lai; Jiaying Xiao
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-01-06

8.  Photoacoustic Signal Enhancement: Towards Utilization of Low Energy Laser Diodes in Real-Time Photoacoustic Imaging.

Authors:  Rayyan Manwar; Matin Hosseinzadeh; Ali Hariri; Karl Kratkiewicz; Shahryar Noei; Mohammad R N Avanaki
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 3.576

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.