| Literature DB >> 25977881 |
Narinée Hovhannisyan1, Stéphane Guillouet1, Fabien Fillesoye1, Martine Dhilly1, Delphine Patin1, Françoise Galateau2, Michel Leporrier1, Louisa Barré1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: [(18)F]Fludarabine is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) radiotracer for imaging lymphoma. The purpose of this preclinical study was to evaluate the robustness of [(18)F]fludarabine during rituximab therapy. In addition, a comparison was made between [(18)F]fludarabine and [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose ([(18)F]FDG) with regard to their concordance with histologically derived data.Entities:
Keywords: Imaging; Lymphoma; PET/CT; Rituximab; [18F]Fludarabine
Year: 2015 PMID: 25977881 PMCID: PMC4414862 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-015-0101-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res Impact factor: 3.138
Figure 1Volumetric assessment with [18F]fludarabine PET/CT and illustration of a delineation of MAVT. (a) Tumour growth in rituximab-treated (n = 5) and vehicle-treated mice (n = 5) - RM two-way ANOVA, *** p < 0.001. Error bars: ± standard error of the mean (SEM). (b) Contouring of metabolically active part of tumour (MAVT) based on segmentation with background (muscle) as threshold. The volume of non-avid tissues was assessed by subtracting the MAVT from the total tumour volume.
Figure 2Illustrations of typical PET/CT scans and quantitative [18F]fludarabine PET/CT analysis. (a) Co-registered and fused coronal images for a vehicle-treated (to the left of the colour scale) and a rituximab-treated animal (to the right of the colour scale); the totality of the tumour is delineated on the illustrations. (b) Relationship between [18F]fludarabine accumulation [%ID] and tumour volume (vehicle-treated, n = 9: left graph and rituximab-treated, n = 9: right graph); PET quantification with VOIMAVT based strictly on the viable lymphoid tissue. Data are displayed as a ratio of baseline (defined as 1). Correlation coefficients and significance were determined using Pearson’s test.
Figure 3Illustration of coronal fused PET/CT images with [18F]fludarabine and [18F]FDG and quantitative comparative analysis. (a) Maximum intensity projections (3D rendering) highlighting the difference between these two radiotracers in terms of normal physiological uptake (e.g. brain, heart, etc.); the totality of the tumour is delineated on the illustrations. (b) Relationship between quantitative values extracted from PET/CT and histology; PET quantification with VOITOT taking into account the tumour heterogeneity. Total uptake [%ID/ml] of the tracer was correlated to the percentage of lymphoid cells in representative sections from each lymphoma as determined by automatic quantification of the histological slices ([18F]fludarabine, n = 7: left graph and [18F]FDG, n = 8: right graph). Correlation coefficients and significance were determined using Pearson’s test.
Figure 4Histological illustrations. Histological section (H.E.S.) and microscopic view (SlidePath Gateway 2.0, Leica Biosystems, Germany) of a tumour from (a) vehicle-treated animal and (b) rituximab-treated animal.