Literature DB >> 15653595

FDG PET in the evaluation of treatment for lymphoma: clinical usefulness and pitfalls.

Toshiki Kazama1, Silvana C Faria, Vithya Varavithya, Sith Phongkitkarun, Hisao Ito, Homer A Macapinlac.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET) with 2-[fluorine-18] fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) may play an important role in the evaluation and management of malignant lymphoma. FDG uptake is predictive of therapeutic response during the course of treatment. After completion of chemotherapy, residual abnormalities representing either residual tumor or necrotic or fibrotic tissue are not uncommon, and FDG PET may be more accurate than computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging in assessing residual disease and identifying patients who require more intense treatment. However, posttreatment FDG PET does not help exclude the presence of minimal residual disease, which may lead to disease relapse. Furthermore, FDG is not a tumor-specific substance, and increased accumulation may be seen in a variety of benign entities and scenarios (eg, infection, drug toxicity, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor therapy, radiation therapy, physiologic activity, postoperative or postbiopsy changes, fracture, degenerative change, injection leakage), which may yield false-positive findings. Nevertheless, recognition of these entities and correlation of FDG PET findings with clinical and other radiologic findings-especially those at combined PET and CT or PET-CT fusion imaging-allows improved diagnostic accuracy. If the interpretation of positive findings is exceptionally difficult, short-term follow-up may be helpful. (c) RSNA, 2005.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15653595     DOI: 10.1148/rg.251045045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  26 in total

Review 1.  PET in lymphoma.

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  PET imaging for Treatment Response in Cancer.

Authors:  Janet F Eary
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2008-01-01

Review 3.  Metabolic positron emission tomography imaging in cancer detection and therapy response.

Authors:  Aizhi Zhu; Daniel Lee; Hyunsuk Shim
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  FDG PET during radiochemotherapy is predictive of outcome at 1 year in non-small-cell lung cancer patients: a prospective multicentre study (RTEP2).

Authors:  Pierre Vera; Sandrine Mezzani-Saillard; Agathe Edet-Sanson; Jean-François Ménard; Romain Modzelewski; Sebastien Thureau; Marc-Etienne Meyer; Khadija Jalali; Stéphane Bardet; Delphine Lerouge; Claire Houzard; Françoise Mornex; Pierre Olivier; Guillaume Faure; Caroline Rousseau; Marc-André Mahé; Philippe Gomez; Isabelle Brenot-Rossi; Naji Salem; Bernard Dubray
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  [18F]FLT is superior to [18F]FDG for predicting early response to antiproliferative treatment in high-grade lymphoma in a dose-dependent manner.

Authors:  Nicolas Graf; Ken Herrmann; Barbara Numberger; Daniela Zwisler; Michaela Aichler; Annette Feuchtinger; Tibor Schuster; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; Christian Peschel; Markus Schwaiger; Ulrich Keller; Tobias Dechow; Andreas K Buck
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Effect of colony-stimulating factor and conventional- or high-dose chemotherapy on FDG uptake in bone marrow.

Authors:  Toshiki Kazama; Nancy Swanston; Donald A Podoloff; Homer A Macapinlac
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-08-31       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in patients with lymphadenopathy suspected of recurrent malignancy after curative treatment.

Authors:  Takuji Iwashita; Ichiro Yasuda; Shinpei Doi; Masanori Nakashima; Hisashi Tsurumi; Yoshinobu Hirose; Tsuyoshi Takami; Masamichi Enya; Tsuyoshi Mukai; Takaya Ohnishi; Keisuke Iwata; Eiichi Tomita; Hisataka Moriwaki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Imaging proliferation to monitor early response of lymphoma to cytotoxic treatment.

Authors:  Nicolas Graf; Ken Herrmann; Jürgen den Hollander; Falko Fend; Tibor Schuster; Hans-Jürgen Wester; Reingard Senekowitsch-Schmidtke; Christian Meyer zum Büschenfelde; Christian Peschel; Markus Schwaiger; Tobias Dechow; Andreas K Buck
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 3.488

9.  Subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma in a child: whole-body MRI in the initial and follow-up evaluations.

Authors:  Gye-Yeon Lim; Seung Tae Hahn; Nak Gyun Chung; Hack Ki Kim
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-09-16

Review 10.  PET/CT in oncology: for which tumours is it the reference standard?

Authors:  Conor D Collins
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.