Literature DB >> 16239904

Biomarkers in cancer staging, prognosis and treatment selection.

Joseph A Ludwig1, John N Weinstein.   

Abstract

Advances in genomics, proteomics and molecular pathology have generated many candidate biomarkers with potential clinical value. Their use for cancer staging and personalization of therapy at the time of diagnosis could improve patient care. However, translation from bench to bedside outside of the research setting has proved more difficult than might have been expected. Understanding how and when biomarkers can be integrated into clinical care is crucial if we want to translate the promise into reality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16239904     DOI: 10.1038/nrc1739

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer        ISSN: 1474-175X            Impact factor:   60.716


  503 in total

Review 1.  Cell-free microRNAs as cancer biomarkers: the odyssey of miRNAs through body fluids.

Authors:  Mohammad Amin Javidi; Amir Hossein Ahmadi; Babak Bakhshinejad; Nazila Nouraee; Sadegh Babashah; Majid Sadeghizadeh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Microfluidic electrochemical immunoarray for ultrasensitive detection of two cancer biomarker proteins in serum.

Authors:  Bhaskara V Chikkaveeraiah; Vigneshwaran Mani; Vyomesh Patel; J Silvio Gutkind; James F Rusling
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 10.618

Review 3.  Gold nanoparticles in chemical and biological sensing.

Authors:  Krishnendu Saha; Sarit S Agasti; Chaekyu Kim; Xiaoning Li; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Comparison of N-linked Glycoproteins in Human Whole Saliva, Parotid, Submandibular, and Sublingual Glandular Secretions Identified using Hydrazide Chemistry and Mass Spectrometry.

Authors:  Prasanna Ramachandran; Pinmanee Boontheung; Eric Pang; Weihong Yan; David T Wong; Joseph A Loo
Journal:  Clin Proteomics       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.988

5.  The ups and downs of DNA repair biomarkers for PARP inhibitor therapies.

Authors:  Xiaozhe Wang; David T Weaver
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2010-01-03       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  Methylation status of NEUROG2 and NID2 improves the diagnosis of stage I NSCLC.

Authors:  Junfeng Geng; Jinfeng Sun; Qiang Lin; Jun Gu; Yangxing Zhao; Hongyu Zhang; Xu Feng; Yinghua He; Wei Wang; Xiaoyu Zhou; Jian Yu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.967

7.  Development of serum glycoproteomic profiling technique; simultaneous identification of glycosylation sites and site-specific quantification of glycan structure changes.

Authors:  Koji Ueda; Sachiko Takami; Naomi Saichi; Yataro Daigo; Nobuhisa Ishikawa; Nobuoki Kohno; Masaru Katsumata; Akio Yamane; Minoru Ota; Taka-Aki Sato; Yusuke Nakamura; Hidewaki Nakagawa
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 8.  Targeted therapy in gastric cancer: personalizing cancer treatment based on patient genome.

Authors:  Sun Min Lim; Jae Yun Lim; Jae Yong Cho
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Self-assembly of random co-polymers for selective binding and detection of peptides.

Authors:  Bo Zhao; Mahalia A C Serrano; Jingjing Gao; Jiaming Zhuang; Richard W Vachet; S Thayumanavan
Journal:  Polym Chem       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 5.582

10.  Proteomic analysis of vitreous biopsy techniques.

Authors:  Jessica M Skeie; Eric N Brown; Harryl D Martinez; Stephen R Russell; Emily S Birkholz; James C Folk; H Culver Boldt; Karen M Gehrs; Edwin M Stone; Michael E Wright; Vinit B Mahajan
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.256

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.