Literature DB >> 15926981

Reducing muscle fatigue due to functional electrical stimulation using random modulation of stimulation parameters.

Adam Thrasher1, Geoffrey M Graham, Milos R Popovic.   

Abstract

A major limitation of many functional electrical stimulation (FES) applications is that muscles tend to fatigue very rapidly. It was hypothesized that FES-induced muscle fatigue could be reduced by randomly modulating the pulse frequency, amplitude, and pulse width in a range of +/-15%. Seven subjects with spinal-cord injuries participated in this study. FES was applied to quadriceps and tibialis anterior muscles using surface electrodes. Isometric force was measured, and the time for the force to drop by 3 dB (fatigue time) was compared between trials. Four different modes of FES were applied in random order: constant stimulation, randomized frequency, randomized amplitude, and randomized pulse width. There was no significant difference between the fatigue-time measurements for the four modes of stimulation (P=0.329). Therefore, random modulation appeared to have no effect. Based on an observed correlation between maximum force measurements and trial order, we concluded that having 10-min rest periods between trials was insufficient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15926981     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2005.29076.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Organs        ISSN: 0160-564X            Impact factor:   3.094


  20 in total

1.  Orderly recruitment of motor units under optical control in vivo.

Authors:  Michael E Llewellyn; Kimberly R Thompson; Karl Deisseroth; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2010-09-26       Impact factor: 53.440

2.  Estimation of the distribution of intramuscular current during electrical stimulation of the quadriceps muscle.

Authors:  Jerrold Petrofsky; Michelle Prowse; Melanie Bain; Elaine Ebilane; Hye Jin Suh; Jennifer Batt; Daryl Lawson; Viviana Hernandez; Armia Abdo; Tien-Ning Yang; Enrique Mendoza; Kelly Collins; Michael Laymon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  An Active Learning Algorithm for Control of Epidural Electrostimulation.

Authors:  Jaehoon Choe; Parag Gad; Thomas A Desautels; Mandheerej S Nandra; Roland R Roy; Hui Zhong; Yu-Chong Tai; V Reggie Edgerton; Joel W Burdick
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Dynamic optimization of stimulation frequency to reduce isometric muscle fatigue using a modified Hill-Huxley model.

Authors:  Brian D Doll; Nicholas A Kirsch; Xuefeng Bao; Brad E Dicianno; Nitin Sharma
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  Extracellular stimulation with human "noisy" electromyographic patterns facilitates myotube activity.

Authors:  M Sciancalepore; T Coslovich; P Lorenzon; G Ziraldo; G Taccola
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 6.  Interfacing with the nervous system: a review of current bioelectric technologies.

Authors:  Ronald Sahyouni; Amin Mahmoodi; Jefferson W Chen; David T Chang; Omid Moshtaghi; Hamid R Djalilian; Harrison W Lin
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Effects of stimulation frequency versus pulse duration modulation on muscle fatigue.

Authors:  Trisha Kesar; Li-Wei Chou; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.368

8.  Adaptive control of movement for neuromuscular stimulation-assisted therapy in a rodent model.

Authors:  Seung-Jae Kim; Mallika D Fairchild; Alexandre Iarkov Yarkov; James J Abbas; Ranu Jung
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Using customized rate-coding and recruitment strategies to maintain forces during repetitive activation of human muscles.

Authors:  Li-Wei Chou; Trisha M Kesar; Stuart A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2008-01-03

10.  Analysis of Muscle Fatigue Progression using Cyclostationary Property of Surface Electromyography Signals.

Authors:  P A Karthick; G Venugopal; S Ramakrishnan
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-11-07       Impact factor: 4.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.