B L Riley1, K L Robinson2, J Gamble3, D T Finegood4, D Sheppard2, T L Penney5, A Best6. 1. Propel Centre for Population Health Impact, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. 2. Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. 3. Imprint Consulting, Hampton, New Brunswick, Canada. 4. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada. 5. Cambridge University, Cambridge, United Kingdom. 6. InSource Research Group, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Solving complex problems such as preventing chronic diseases introduces unique challenges for the creation and application of knowledge, or knowledge to action (KTA). KTA approaches that apply principles of systems thinking are thought to hold promise, but practical strategies for their application are not well understood. In this paper we report the results of a scan of systems approaches to KTA with a goal to identify how to optimize their implementation and impact. METHODS: A 5-person advisory group purposefully selected 9 initiatives to achieve diversity on issues addressed and organizational forms. Information on each case was gathered from documents and through telephone interviews with primary contacts within each organization. Following verification of case descriptions, an inductive analysis was conducted within and across cases. RESULTS: The cases revealed 5 guidelines for moving from conceiving KTA systems to implementing them: (1) establish and nurture relationships, (2) co-produce and curate knowledge, (3) create feedback loops, (4) frame as systems interventions rather than projects, and (5) consider variations across time and place. CONCLUSION: Results from the environmental scan are a modest start to translating systems concepts for KTA into practice. Use of the strategies revealed in the scan may improve KTA for solving complex public health problems. The strategies themselves will benefit from the development of a science that aims to understand adaptation and ongoing learning from policy and practice interventions, strengthens enduring relationships, and fills system gaps in addition to evidence gaps. Systems approaches to KTA will also benefit from robust evaluations.
INTRODUCTION: Solving complex problems such as preventing chronic diseases introduces unique challenges for the creation and application of knowledge, or knowledge to action (KTA). KTA approaches that apply principles of systems thinking are thought to hold promise, but practical strategies for their application are not well understood. In this paper we report the results of a scan of systems approaches to KTA with a goal to identify how to optimize their implementation and impact. METHODS: A 5-person advisory group purposefully selected 9 initiatives to achieve diversity on issues addressed and organizational forms. Information on each case was gathered from documents and through telephone interviews with primary contacts within each organization. Following verification of case descriptions, an inductive analysis was conducted within and across cases. RESULTS: The cases revealed 5 guidelines for moving from conceiving KTA systems to implementing them: (1) establish and nurture relationships, (2) co-produce and curate knowledge, (3) create feedback loops, (4) frame as systems interventions rather than projects, and (5) consider variations across time and place. CONCLUSION: Results from the environmental scan are a modest start to translating systems concepts for KTA into practice. Use of the strategies revealed in the scan may improve KTA for solving complex public health problems. The strategies themselves will benefit from the development of a science that aims to understand adaptation and ongoing learning from policy and practice interventions, strengthens enduring relationships, and fills system gaps in addition to evidence gaps. Systems approaches to KTA will also benefit from robust evaluations.
Entities:
Keywords:
intervention studies; knowledge transfer; public health; systems approach
Authors: Lori Kiefer; John Frank; Erica Di Ruggiero; Maureen Dobbins; Doug Manuel; Paul R Gully; David Mowat Journal: Can J Public Health Date: 2005 May-Jun
Authors: Scott J Leischow; Allan Best; William M Trochim; Pamela I Clark; Richard S Gallagher; Stephen E Marcus; Eva Matthews Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Paul A Estabrooks; Samantha M Harden; Fabio A Almeida; Jennie L Hill; Sallie Beth Johnson; Gwenndolyn C Porter; Mark H Greenawald Journal: Exerc Sport Sci Rev Date: 2019-07 Impact factor: 6.230
Authors: Claire Harris; Kelly Allen; Vanessa Brooke; Tim Dyer; Cara Waller; Richard King; Wayne Ramsey; Duncan Mortimer Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-05-25 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Claire Harris; Kelly Allen; Cara Waller; Tim Dyer; Vanessa Brooke; Marie Garrubba; Angela Melder; Catherine Voutier; Anthony Gust; Dina Farjou Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-06-21 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Claire Harris; Kelly Allen; Cara Waller; Sally Green; Richard King; Wayne Ramsey; Cate Kelly; Malar Thiagarajan Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 2.655