Literature DB >> 19305650

Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers.

John N Lavis1, Huw T O Davies, Russell L Gruen, Kieran Walshe, Cynthia M Farquhar.   

Abstract

Participants in the Cochrane Collaboration conduct and periodically update systematic reviews that address the question, "What works?" for healthcare interventions. The Cochrane Library makes available quality-appraised systematic reviews that address this question. No coordinated effort has been undertaken to conduct and periodically update systematic reviews that address the other types of questions asked by healthcare managers and policy makers, to adapt existing reviews to highlight decision-relevant information (including the factors that may affect assessments of a review's local applicability) or to facilitate their retrieval through a "one-stop shopping" portal. Researchers interested in evaluating new methodological developments, health services and policy researchers interested in conducting and adapting systematic reviews, and research funders all have a role to play in making systematic reviews more useful for healthcare managers and policy makers.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 19305650      PMCID: PMC2585325     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Healthc Policy        ISSN: 1715-6572


  14 in total

1.  Public accountability: one rule for practitioners, one for scientists?

Authors:  N Black; S Carter
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2001-07

2.  Scope of EPOC is clarified.

Authors:  Laura M McAuley; Jeremy Grimshaw; Merrick Zwarenstein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-12

3.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  David Atkins; Dana Best; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Margaret C Haugh; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Gillian Leng; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Philippa Middleton; Jacek Mrukowicz; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger J Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Helena Varonen; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

Review 4.  Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods.

Authors:  Mary Dixon-Woods; Shona Agarwal; David Jones; Bridget Young; Alex Sutton
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2005-01

5.  Use of research to inform public policymaking.

Authors:  John N Lavis; Francisco Becerra Posada; Andy Haines; Eric Osei
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2004 Oct 30-Nov 5       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Towards systematic reviews that inform health care management and policy-making.

Authors:  John Lavis; Huw Davies; Andy Oxman; Jean-Louis Denis; Karen Golden-Biddle; Ewan Ferlie
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2005-07

7.  Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policy-making.

Authors:  Trevor A Sheldon
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2005-07

8.  Using research to inform healthcare managers' and policy makers' questions: from summative to interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2005-09

Review 9.  On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research.

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas; Naomi Fulop; Diane Gagnon; Pauline Allen
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 10.  More informative abstracts revisited.

Authors:  R B Haynes; C D Mulrow; E J Huth; D G Altman; M J Gardner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1990-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  45 in total

1.  Funding agencies in low- and middle-income countries: support for knowledge translation.

Authors:  Cynthia Cordero; Rachel Delino; L Jeyaseelan; Mary Ann Lansang; Juan M Lozano; Shuba Kumar; Socorro Moreno; Merle Pietersen; Jose Quirino; Visanu Thamlikitkul; Vivian A Welch; Jacqueline Tetroe; Aleida Ter Kuile; Ian D Graham; Jeremy Grimshaw; Vic Neufeld; George Wells; Peter Tugwell
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 9.408

2.  Commentary: whose views count in evidence synthesis? And when do they count?

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

3.  Informing policy making and management in healthcare: the place for synthesis.

Authors:  Catherine Pope; Nicholas Mays; Jennie Popay
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

4.  A decision-maker's perspective on Lavis and Lomas.

Authors:  Rick Roger
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

5.  The research collective: a model for developing timely, contextually relevant and dynamic approaches to research synthesis?

Authors:  Charlyn Black
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-05

6.  Researchers' role in policy decision-making: purveyors of evidence, purveyors of ideas?

Authors:  Brian Hutchison
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

7.  Moving forward on both systematic reviews and deliberative processes.

Authors:  John N Lavis
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

8.  Reframing evidence synthesis as rhetorical action in the policy making drama.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Jill Russell
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2006-01

Review 9.  How contexts and issues influence the use of policy-relevant research syntheses: a critical interpretive synthesis.

Authors:  Kaelan A Moat; John N Lavis; Julia Abelson
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.911

10.  A randomized controlled trial evaluating the impact of knowledge translation and exchange strategies.

Authors:  Maureen Dobbins; Steven E Hanna; Donna Ciliska; Steve Manske; Roy Cameron; Shawna L Mercer; Linda O'Mara; Kara DeCorby; Paula Robeson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.