| Literature DB >> 25963527 |
Christoph Brochhausen1, Hinrich B Winther, Christian Hundt, Volker H Schmitt, Elmar Schömer, C James Kirkpatrick.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Whole-slide imaging (WSI) has become more prominent and continues to gain in importance in student teaching. Applications with different scope have been developed. Many of these applications have either technical or design shortcomings.Entities:
Keywords: Internet; WSI; databases; e-learning; microscopy; telepathology; virtual microscopy; whole-slide imaging
Year: 2015 PMID: 25963527 PMCID: PMC4443020 DOI: 10.2196/ijmr.3495
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Interact J Med Res ISSN: 1929-073X
Figure 1The overall size M can be written in terms of a finite geometric series, where N is the number of downsampling operations.
Descriptive analysis of the dataset of the questionnaire.
| Variablea | Number of observations, n | Mean | SD | Kurtosis | SE |
| Gender | 212 | 0.6321 | 0.4834 | -1.7122 | 0.0332 |
| Age | 213 | 1.1455 | 0.3535 | 1.9941 | 0.0242 |
| InternetAccess | 207 | 1.2995 | 0.7420 | 4.4098 | 0.0516 |
| InternetUsage | 207 | 2.5556 | 0.7731 | -0.4041 | 0.0537 |
| InternetCompetency | 205 | 2.3415 | 1.0197 | 1.6230 | 0.0712 |
| WSIUsage | 201 | 2.3881 | 1.0529 | 1.5121 | 0.0743 |
| AdvantagesForTests | 204 | 1.0490 | 0.2937 | 36.2616 | 0.0206 |
| Workplace | 200 | 1.4100 | 0.7842 | 0.1971 | 0.0555 |
| D_PC | 216 | 0.3194 | 0.4673 | -1.4150 | 0.0318 |
| D_Laptop | 216 | 0.8426 | 0.3650 | 1.4978 | 0.0248 |
| D_Phone | 216 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | N/Ab | 0.0000 |
| D_Tablet | 216 | 0.0231 | 0.1507 | 37.8429 | 0.0103 |
| OfflineVersion | 198 | 1.2020 | 0.4025 | 0.1709 | 0.0286 |
| UsabilityWSI | 203 | 2.5813 | 1.0230 | 0.1626 | 0.0718 |
| ImageQualityWSI | 205 | 2.3756 | 1.1204 | 0.5234 | 0.0783 |
| F_BackgroundInfo | 216 | 0.6759 | 0.4691 | -1.4493 | 0.0319 |
| F_Forum | 216 | 0.0417 | 0.2003 | 18.8398 | 0.0136 |
| F_Lattitude | 216 | 0.8796 | 0.3261 | 3.3850 | 0.0222 |
| F_HAnnotations | 216 | 0.8843 | 0.3207 | 3.7083 | 0.0218 |
| F_PAnnotations | 216 | 0.8611 | 0.3466 | 2.3118 | 0.0236 |
| F_POI | 216 | 0.8380 | 0.3693 | 1.3245 | 0.0251 |
| F_TeachingTexts | 216 | 0.5231 | 0.5006 | -2.0007 | 0.0341 |
| K_MHM | 216 | 0.9213 | 0.2699 | 7.6916 | 0.0184 |
| K_Histoweb | 216 | 0.0741 | 0.2625 | 8.4730 | 0.0179 |
| K_HistonetUlm | 216 | 0.0370 | 0.1893 | 21.8072 | 0.0129 |
| K_Histology | 216 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | N/A | 0.0000 |
| K_HistonetMarburg | 216 | 0.0139 | 0.1173 | 66.3673 | 0.0080 |
| K_HistoWebAtlas | 216 | 0.0185 | 0.1351 | 48.5383 | 0.0092 |
| K_vMic | 216 | 0.0139 | 0.1173 | 66.3673 | 0.0080 |
| K_Pathorama | 216 | 0.0046 | 0.0680 | 209.0277 | 0.0046 |
| K_virtPatho | 216 | 0.0046 | 0.0680 | 209.0277 | 0.0046 |
| K_NeoCortex | 216 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | N/A | 0.0000 |
| K_AVKurs | 216 | 0.0000 | 0.0000 | N/A | 0.0000 |
| K_Histologiekurs | 216 | 0.0046 | 0.0680 | 209.0277 | 0.0046 |
| K_other | 216 | 0.0694 | 0.2548 | 9.3594 | 0.0173 |
aSee Multimedia Appendix 1 for a detailed description of the variables.
bNot applicable (N/A).
Figure 2Features for WSI applications in relation to the importance to the students.
Figure 3Previously known WSI applications in relation to students' degree of familiarity to these applications.
Figure 4Spearman rank correlation coefficient heat map of the questionnaire items. Each rectangle contains the correlation coefficient in the upper half and the corresponding P value in the lower half, if applicable. A red cross marks individual P values where P<.05. The color of each rectangle indicates the value of the correlation coefficient. The legend below the heat map provides a concise description for each variable.
Figure 5Side-by-side view of desktop layout (A) versus mobile layout (B) depicting appendicitis (ie, inflammation of the appendix). The control panel folds if the screen resolution is too small (B) to provide an unhindered view on the slide. Pathological annotations are shown.
Summary of the test setup of Pate.
| Concurrency | Total transactions performed, n | Response time (ms), | Transactions/ second, mean | Pixels/ second, mean | Individual transactions/ second/ worker, mean | Individual pixels/ second/ worker, mean |
| 1 | 1000 | 18.8 (4.3) | 52.6 | 3,449,263 | 52.6 | 3,449,263 |
| 2 | 2000 | 12.0 (8.4) | 166.7 | 10,922,667 | 83.3 | 5,461,333 |
| 3 | 3000 | 18.2 (13.0) | 166.7 | 10,922,667 | 55.6 | 3,640,889 |
| 4 | 4000 | 16.4 (13.2) | 235.3 | 15,420,235 | 58.8 | 3,855,059 |
| 5 | 5000 | 20.7 (16.9) | 238.1 | 15,603,810 | 47.6 | 3,120,762 |
| 6 | 6000 | 24.5 (19.1) | 240.0 | 15,728,640 | 40.0 | 2,621,440 |
| 7 | 7000 | 29.6 (21.1) | 233.3 | 15,291,733 | 33.3 | 2,184,533 |
| 8 | 8000 | 33.7 (32.9) | 228.6 | 14,979,657 | 28.6 | 1,872,457 |
| 9 | 9000 | 38.0 (25.7) | 236.8 | 15,521,684 | 26.3 | 1,724,632 |
| 10 | 10,000 | 40.7 (28.5) | 243.9 | 15,984,390 | 24.4 | 1,598,439 |
| 11 | 11,000 | 46.6 (34.9) | 229.2 | 15,018,667 | 20.8 | 1,365,333 |
| 12 | 12,000 | 50.0 (37.8) | 235.3 | 15,420,235 | 19.6 | 1,285,020 |
| 13 | 13,000 | 54.8 (43.9) | 232.1 | 15,213,714 | 17.9 | 1,170,286 |
| 14 | 14,000 | 58.9 (49.6) | 233.3 | 15,291,733 | 16.7 | 1,092,267 |
| 15 | 15,000 | 63.1 (52.5) | 234.4 | 15,360,000 | 15.6 | 1,024,000 |
| 16 | 16,000 | 65.2 (55.2) | 242.4 | 15,887,515 | 15.2 | 992,970 |
| 17 | 17,000 | 69.1 (58.6) | 239.4 | 15,691,718 | 14.1 | 923,042 |
| 18 | 18,000 | 77.8 (63.9) | 227.9 | 14,932,253 | 12.7 | 829,570 |
| 19 | 19,000 | 78.7 (67.4) | 237.5 | 15,564,800 | 12.5 | 819,200 |
| 20 | 20,000 | 84.7 (69.0) | 232.6 | 15,240,930 | 11.6 | 762,047 |
Figure 6Plot of the values of Table 4 depicting the median response time in msec, including the standard deviation, as well as the transactions per second, pixels per second, and total and individual pixels per worker per second.