Literature DB >> 25963189

Predictive Factors for Spontaneous Stone Passage and the Potential Role of Serum C-Reactive Protein in Patients with 4 to 10 mm Distal Ureteral Stones: A Prospective Clinical Study.

Cihat Özcan1, Ozgu Aydoğdu2, Cagri Senocak3, Erman Damar3, Asir Eraslan3, Derya Oztuna4, Omer Faruk Bozkurt3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We investigated possible predictive factors for spontaneous stone passage and the potential role of serum C-reactive protein and white blood count in patients with 4 to 10 mm distal ureteral stones.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 251 patients who presented with renal colic secondary to distal ureteral stone were included in study. Patients were grouped according to spontaneous stone passage. Serum C-reactive protein, white blood count and other possible factors were investigated for their potential predictive value for spontaneous stone passage at a followup of 5 weeks. Potential predictive factors for spontaneous stone passage were evaluated with univariate and multivariate analyses. ROC curve analysis was performed to find an optimal cutoff value for serum C-reactive protein according to spontaneous stone passage. Statistical significance was considered at p <0.05.
RESULTS: Spontaneous stone passage was observed in 135 patients (53.8%) in group 1 while 116 (46.2%) in group 2 did not expel the stone spontaneously. Median stone size was 5.7 mm. Stone size, serum C-reactive protein and white blood count were significantly higher in group 2 than in group 1. The number of patients with hydronephrosis and the number with spontaneous stone passage history were significantly lower in group 2 compared to group 1. The cutoff value of serum C-reactive protein provided by ROC analysis was 0.506 mg/l. Time to spontaneous stone passage was significantly higher in patients with serum C-reactive protein above the threshold and in patients with ureteral stones greater than 6 mm.
CONCLUSIONS: Stone size, previous spontaneous passage, hydronephrosis, serum C-reactive protein and white blood count can be used to predict spontaneous stone passage in patients with 4 to 10 mm distal ureteral stones. A serum C-reactive protein level of 0.506 mg/l can serve as a cutoff value to predict spontaneous stone passage.
Copyright © 2015 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  C-reactive protein; calculi; leukocyte count; prognosis; ureter

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25963189     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.04.104

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  17 in total

1.  Emergent ureteral stone treatment: Whom? When?

Authors:  Akif Erbin; Omer Sarilar; Abdulkadir Tepeler
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  CT-related parameters and Framingham score as predictors of spontaneous passage of ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm: results from a prospective, observational, multicenter study.

Authors:  Ismail Selvi; Numan Baydilli; Turgut Tursem Tokmak; Emre Can Akinsal; Halil Basar
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2020-09-27       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Association of spontaneous expulsion with C-reactive protein and other clinico-demographic factors in patients with lower ureteric stone.

Authors:  Amit Jain; Sreerag Kodakkattil Sreenivasan; Ramanitharan Manikandan; Lalgudi Narayanan Dorairajan; Sujatha Sistla; Subathra Adithan
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Inflammatory serum markers predicting spontaneous ureteral stone passage.

Authors:  Nassib Abou Heidar; Muhieddine Labban; Gerges Bustros; Rami Nasr
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2019-11-08       Impact factor: 2.801

Review 5.  Role of conservative management of stones.

Authors:  Kesavapillai Subramonian; Hector Sandoval Barba; Maitrey Darrad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-11-01

Review 6.  Imaging in the diagnosis of pediatric urolithiasis.

Authors:  Gabrielle C Colleran; Michael J Callahan; Harriet J Paltiel; Caleb P Nelson; Bartley G Cilento; Michelle A Baum; Jeanne S Chow
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2016-11-04

7.  Does volume matter? Incorporating estimated stone volume in a nomogram to predict ureteral stone passage.

Authors:  Nassib Abou Heidar; Muhieddine Labban; David-Dan Nguyen; Adnan El-Achkar; Mazen Mansour; Naeem Bhojani; Rami Nasr
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  A machine learning model for predicting surgical intervention in renal colic due to ureteral stone(s) < 5 mm.

Authors:  Miki Haifler; Nir Kleinmann; Rennen Haramaty; Dorit E Zilberman
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-07-11       Impact factor: 4.996

9.  Is computed tomography-defined obstruction a predictor of urological intervention in emergency department patients presenting with renal colic?

Authors:  Peter Alexander Massaro; Avinash Kanji; Paul Atkinson; Ryan Pawsey; Tom Whelan
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Predictors of surgical intervention following initial surveillance for acute ureteric colic.

Authors:  Mohit Bajaj; Lance Yuan; Lauren C Holmes; Michael Rice; Kamran Zargar-Shoshtari
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-03-29       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.