Literature DB >> 25960974

Insertion of totally implantable central venous access devices by surgeons.

Hyeonjun An1, Chun-Geun Ryu1, Eun-Joo Jung1, Hyun Jong Kang2, Jin Hee Paik1, Jung-Hyun Yang2, Dae-Yong Hwang1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to evaluate the results for the insertion of totally implantable central venous access devices (TICVADs) by surgeons.
METHODS: Total 397 patients, in whom TICVADs had been inserted for intravenous chemotherapy between September 2008 and June 2014, were pooled. This procedure was performed under local anesthesia in an operation room. The insertion site for the TICVAD was mainly in the right-side subclavian vein. In the case of breast cancer patients, the subclavian vein opposite the surgical site was used for insertion.
RESULTS: The 397 patients included 73 males and 324 females. Primary malignant tumors were mainly colorectal and breast cancer. The mean operation time was 54 minutes (18-276 minutes). Operation-related complications occurred in 33 cases (8.3%). Early complications developed in 15 cases with catheter malposition and puncture failure. Late complications, which developed after 24 hours, included inflammation in 6 cases, skin necrosis in 6 cases, hematoma in 3 cases, port malfunction in 1 case, port migration in 1 case, and intractable pain at the port site in 1 case.
CONCLUSION: Insertion of a TICVAD under local anesthesia by a surgeon is a relatively safe procedure. Meticulous undermining of the skin and carefully managing the TICVAD could minimize complications.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Central venous catheterization; Maintenance chemotherapy; Vascular access devices

Year:  2015        PMID: 25960974      PMCID: PMC4422989          DOI: 10.3393/ac.2015.31.2.63

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Coloproctol        ISSN: 2287-9714


  17 in total

Review 1.  Management of venous port systems in oncology: a review of current evidence.

Authors:  S Vescia; A K Baumgärtner; V R Jacobs; M Kiechle-Bahat; A Rody; S Loibl; N Harbeck
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 32.976

2.  Percutaneous image-guided implantation of totally implantable venous access ports in the forearm or the chest? A patients' point of view.

Authors:  Jan Peter Goltz; Bernhard Petritsch; Johannes Kirchner; Dietbert Hahn; Ralph Kickuth
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 3.603

3.  Insertion of totally implantable venous access devices: an expertise-based, randomized, controlled trial (NCT00600444).

Authors:  Phillip Knebel; Ruben Lopez-Benitez; Lars Fischer; Boris A Radeleff; Ulrike Stampfl; Thomas Bruckner; Roland Hennes; Meinhard Kieser; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Increased use of percutaneous technique for totally implantable venous access devices. Is it real progress? A 27-year comprehensive review on early complications.

Authors:  Isidoro Di Carlo; Elia Pulvirenti; Maurizio Mannino; Adriana Toro
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Jugular versus subclavian totally implantable access ports: catheter position, complications and intrainterventional pain perception.

Authors:  Cédric Plumhans; Andreas H Mahnken; Christina Ocklenburg; Sebastian Keil; Florian F Behrendt; Rolf W Günther; Felix Schoth
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  A retrospective clinical study: complications of totally implanted central venous access ports.

Authors:  June Pill Seok; Young Jin Kim; Hyun Min Cho; Han Young Ryu; Wan Jin Hwang; Tae Yun Sung
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-02-05

7.  Safety of a totally implantable central venous port system with percutaneous subclavian vein access.

Authors:  Dong-Yoon Keum; Jae-Bum Kim; Min-Cheol Chae
Journal:  Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-06-05

8.  A comparative study between two central veins for the introduction of totally implantable venous access devices in 1201 cancer patients.

Authors:  C Araújo; J P Silva; P Antunes; J M Fernandes; C Dias; H Pereira; T Dias; J L Fougo
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 4.424

9.  Wound dehiscence or failure to heal following venous access port placement in patients receiving bevacizumab therapy.

Authors:  Walter J Zawacki; T Gregory Walker; Emily DeVasher; Elkan F Halpern; Arthur C Waltman; Stephan T Wicky; David P Ryan; Sanjeeva P Kalva
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 3.464

10.  Image-guided chemoport insertion by interventional radiologists: A single-center experience on periprocedural complications.

Authors:  Yazmin Yaacob; Dang V Nguyen; Zahiah Mohamed; A Razali A Ralib; Rozman Zakaria; Sobri Muda
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2013-04
View more
  8 in total

1.  Spontaneous migration of an implanted central venous access device into the ipsilateral jugular vein.

Authors:  Brett L Houston; Matthew Yan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Complications and management strategies of totally implantable venous access port insertion through percutaneous subclavian vein.

Authors:  Yusuf Velioğlu; Ahmet Yüksel; Emrah Sınmaz
Journal:  Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg       Date:  2019-10-23       Impact factor: 0.332

3.  Commentary on "Insertion of Totally Implantable Central Venous Access Devices by Surgeons" - What Is the Role of Surgeons When Implanting a Totally Implantable Venous Access Device to Prevent Immediate Complications?

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Gaetano Bertino; Annalisa Ardiri; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-08

4.  Usefulness of Percutaneous Puncture in Insertion of Totally Implantable Venous Access Devices in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Jung Sik Choi; Keun-Myoung Park; Sungteak Jung; Kee Chun Hong; Yong Sun Jeon; Soon Gu Cho; Yun-Mee Choe
Journal:  Vasc Specialist Int       Date:  2017-09-30

5.  Validation of a questionnaire of knowledge and attitudes about the subcutaneous venous reservoir in nursing.

Authors:  Roberto Raña-Rocha; Ignacio López-de-Ullibarri; María-Jesús Movilla-Fernández; Carmen Coronado Carvajal
Journal:  Rev Lat Am Enfermagem       Date:  2020-04-17

6.  Supraclavicular versus infraclavicular approach in inserting totally implantable central venous access for cancer therapy: A comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  Amine Souadka; Hajar Essangri; Imad Boualaoui; Abdelilah Ghannam; Amine Benkabbou; Laila Amrani; Raouf Mohsine; Mohammed Anass Majbar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Reply on "What Is the Role of Surgeons When Implanting a Totally Implantable Venous Access Device to Prevent Immediate Complications?".

Authors:  Eun-Joo Jung; Dae-Yong Hwang
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2015-08

Review 8.  Forty years after the first totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) implant: the pure surgical cut-down technique only avoids immediate complications that can be fatal.

Authors:  Adriana Toro; Elena Schembari; Emanuele Gaspare Fontana; Salomone Di Saverio; Isidoro Di Carlo
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 3.445

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.