BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are critical to advancing cancer treatment. Minority populations are underrepresented among trial participants, and there is limited understanding of their decision-making process and key determinants of decision outcomes regarding trial participation. METHODS: To understand research decision-making among clinical trial-eligible African-American cancer patients at Johns Hopkins, we conducted seven focus groups (n=32) with trial-offered patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with lung, breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer ≤ 5 years. Three "acceptor" and four "decliner" focus groups were conducted. Questions addressed: attitudes towards clinical trials, reasons for accepting or declining participation, and recommendations to improve minority recruitment and enrollment. Data were transcribed and analyzed using traditional approaches to content and thematic analysis in NVivo 9.0. Data coding resulted in themes that supported model construction. RESULTS: Participant experiences revealed the following themes when describing the decision-making process: Information gathering, Intrapersonal perspectives, and Interpersonal influences. Decision outcomes included the presence or absence of decision regret and satisfaction. From these themes, we generated a Model of Cancer Clinical Trial Decision-making. CONCLUSION: Our model should be tested in hypothesis-driven research to elucidate factors and processes influencing decision balance and outcomes of trial-related decision-making. The model should also be tested in other disparities populations and for diagnoses other than cancer.
BACKGROUND: Clinical trials are critical to advancing cancer treatment. Minority populations are underrepresented among trial participants, and there is limited understanding of their decision-making process and key determinants of decision outcomes regarding trial participation. METHODS: To understand research decision-making among clinical trial-eligible African-American cancerpatients at Johns Hopkins, we conducted seven focus groups (n=32) with trial-offered patients ≥ 18 years diagnosed with lung, breast, prostate, or colorectal cancer ≤ 5 years. Three "acceptor" and four "decliner" focus groups were conducted. Questions addressed: attitudes towards clinical trials, reasons for accepting or declining participation, and recommendations to improve minority recruitment and enrollment. Data were transcribed and analyzed using traditional approaches to content and thematic analysis in NVivo 9.0. Data coding resulted in themes that supported model construction. RESULTS:Participant experiences revealed the following themes when describing the decision-making process: Information gathering, Intrapersonal perspectives, and Interpersonal influences. Decision outcomes included the presence or absence of decision regret and satisfaction. From these themes, we generated a Model of Cancer Clinical Trial Decision-making. CONCLUSION: Our model should be tested in hypothesis-driven research to elucidate factors and processes influencing decision balance and outcomes of trial-related decision-making. The model should also be tested in other disparities populations and for diagnoses other than cancer.
Entities:
Keywords:
African-Americans; Cancer disparities; Clinical trials; Decision balance; Decision regret
Authors: Jean G Ford; Mollie W Howerton; Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Shari Bolen; M Chris Gibbons; Jon Tilburt; Charles Baffi; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Renee F Wilson; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Christopher J Chow; Elizabeth B Habermann; Anasooya Abraham; Yanrong Zhu; Selwyn M Vickers; David A Rothenberger; Waddah B Al-Refaie Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2013-02-13 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: Anjali S Advani; Benjamin Atkeson; Carrie L Brown; Bercedis L Peterson; Laura Fish; Jeffrey L Johnson; Jon P Gockerman; Marc Gautier Journal: Cancer Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Gabriel Y Lai; Tiffany L Gary; Jon Tilburt; Shari Bolen; Charles Baffi; Renee F Wilson; Mollie W Howerton; M Chris Gibbons; Teerath Peter Tanpitukpongse; Neil R Powe; Eric B Bass; Jean G Ford Journal: Clin Trials Date: 2006 Impact factor: 2.486
Authors: M Baier; N Calonge; G Cutter; M McClatchey; S Schoentgen; S Hines; A Marcus; D Ahnen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jennifer Wenzel; Randy A Jones; Rachel Klimmek; Sharon Krumm; Linda P Darrell; Danny Song; Vered Stearns; Jean G Ford Journal: Clin J Oncol Nurs Date: 2012-08 Impact factor: 1.027
Authors: Randy A Jones; Rachel Hirschey; Grace Campbell; Mary E Cooley; Darryl Somayaji; Robin Lally; Erik K Rueter; Mary Magee Gullatte Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Daniel M Walker; Christine M Swoboda; Karen Shiu-Yee; Willi L Tarver; Timiya S Nolan; Joshua J Joseph Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-09-22 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Lourdes R Carhuapoma; Winter M Thayer; Catherine E Elmore; Jane Gildersleeve; Tanmay Singh; Farah Shaukat; Melissa K Uveges; Tamryn Gray; Crystal Chu; Daniel Song; Patricia J Hollen; Jennifer Wenzel; Randy A Jones Journal: Trials Date: 2021-09-16 Impact factor: 2.728
Authors: Soumya J Niranjan; Jennifer A Wenzel; Michelle Y Martin; Mona N Fouad; Selwyn M Vickers; Badrinath R Konety; Raegan W Durant Journal: JCO Oncol Pract Date: 2021-05
Authors: Janiece L Taylor; Brittany F Drazich; Laken Roberts; Safiyyah Okoye; Emerald Rivers; Jennifer Wenzel; Rebecca Wright; Mary Catherine Beach; Sarah L Szanton Journal: J Women Aging Date: 2020-05-31