Literature DB >> 8716204

Ethical and practical problems of early anti-cancer drug trials: a review of the literature.

K Cox, M Avis.   

Abstract

Early clinical trials for new anti-cancer drug treatments typically use patients with cancer as research subjects. This paper identifies some of the ethical and practical concerns that arise from the recruitment of a vulnerable group of patients and their exposure to a drug of unknown risk or benefit. This review discusses the ethical principles related to recruitment and informed consent in cancer trials, and indicates that there is a lack of consensus concerning the requirements, process and practice of informed consent. It is suggested that, as yet, little is known about patients' decision making framework in this situation, and the need for further work that concentrates on the patient's point of view is highlighted. The paper concludes by discussing some of the difficulties associated with obtaining patients' opinions, and suggests that the use of a qualitative approach may overcome some of these problems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomedical and Behavioral Research

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8716204     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.1996.tb00214.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  7 in total

1.  Participant Perspectives in an HIV Cure-Related Trial Conducted Exclusively in Women in the United States: Results from AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5366.

Authors:  Karine Dubé; Lara Hosey; Kate Starr; Liz Barr; David Evans; Erin Hoffman; Danielle M Campbell; Jane Simoni; Jeremy Sugarman; John Sauceda; Brandon Brown; Karen L Diepstra; Catherine Godfrey; Daniel R Kuritzkes; David A Wohl; Rajesh Gandhi; Eileen Scully
Journal:  AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.205

2.  The evaluation of the risks and benefits of phase II cancer clinical trials by institutional review board (IRB) members: a case study.

Authors:  H E M van Luijn; N K Aaronson; R B Keus; A W Musschenga
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  A Model of Cancer Clinical Trial Decision-making Informed by African-American Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Jennifer A Wenzel; Olive Mbah; Jiayun Xu; Gyasi Moscou-Jackson; Haneefa Saleem; Kwame Sakyi; Jean G Ford
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2015-06

4.  Barriers and facilitators to the participation of subjects in clinical trials: An overview of reviews.

Authors:  Edgardo Rodríguez-Torres; Margarita M González-Pérez; Clemente Díaz-Pérez
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2021-08-03

5.  Participation in HIV cure-related research: a scoping review of the proxy literature and implications for future research.

Authors:  Karine Dubé; Catalina Ramirez; Jessica Handibode; Jeffrey Taylor; Asheley Skinner; Sandra Greene; Joseph D Tucker
Journal:  J Virus Erad       Date:  2015-10

6.  Why do patients decline surgical trials? Findings from a qualitative interview study embedded in the Cancer Research UK BOLERO trial (Bladder cancer: Open versus Lapararoscopic or RObotic cystectomy).

Authors:  Emily Harrop; John Kelly; Gareth Griffiths; Angela Casbard; Annmarie Nelson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  "I didn't really understand it, I just thought it'd help": exploring the motivations, understandings and experiences of patients with advanced lung cancer participating in a non-placebo clinical IMP trial.

Authors:  Emily Harrop; Simon Noble; Michelle Edwards; Stephanie Sivell; Barbara Moore; Annmarie Nelson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 2.279

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.