Emine Canyilmaz1, Adnan Yoney2, Lasif Serdar3, Gonca Hanedan Uslu4, Ozlem Aynaci5, Emel Haciislamoglu6, Melek Nur Yavuz7. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. Electronic address: dremocan@ktu.edu.tr. 2. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. Electronic address: adnan@yoney.net. 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. Electronic address: ercan_serdar@hotmail.com. 4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Kanuni Research and Education Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey. Electronic address: drgoncahanedanuslu@hotmail.com. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. Electronic address: ozlemaynaci@gmail.com. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey. Electronic address: fizemelcim@hotmail.com. 7. Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Akdeniz University, Antalya,Turkey. Electronic address: meleknur68@yahoo.com.tr.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and toxicity of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) in elderly patients with invasive bladder cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Elderly patients (n=188; mean 75-year-old, range 70-91 years; 88.3% male/11.7% female) with T1-T4a bladder carcinoma were irradiated with CBRT. A total of 24 (12.8%) patients were diagnosed at stage T1, 117 (62.2%) were at stage T2, 28 (14.9%) at were stage T3a, 14 (7.4%) were stage T3b, and 5 (2.7%) were stage T4a. A dose of 45Gy in 1.8Gy fractions was administered to the whole pelvis 5 days/week over 5 weeks. A concomitant boost limited to the bladder tumor area plus margin or whole bladder of 22.5Gy in 1.5Gy fractions was administered from weeks 3×5. Thus, irradiation totalled 67.5Gy over 5 weeks. The interfraction interval was ≥6h/treatment day. We assessed prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 46.2 months (range 4.7-155.7 months). Median overall survival was 27 months (95% CI:21-33 months). In this study, 146 (77.7%) patients had complete response, 39 (20.7%) had residual disease and 4 (1.6%) had progressive disease. The mean 3-, 5- and 10-year OS rates were respectively 41.2% (S.E.±0.036), 29% (S.E.±0.034), and 13.8% (S.E.±0.031). Significant prognostic factors for OS and CSS, by multivariate analysis, were tumor T-stage and urothelial obstruction. CONCLUSION: This CBRT protocol provided excellent results with a high complete response rate and good tolerance. This approach may therefore be particularly appropriate for elderly patients with invasive bladder cancer.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term clinical efficacy and toxicity of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) in elderly patients with invasive bladder cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Elderly patients (n=188; mean 75-year-old, range 70-91 years; 88.3% male/11.7% female) with T1-T4a bladder carcinoma were irradiated with CBRT. A total of 24 (12.8%) patients were diagnosed at stage T1, 117 (62.2%) were at stage T2, 28 (14.9%) at were stage T3a, 14 (7.4%) were stage T3b, and 5 (2.7%) were stage T4a. A dose of 45Gy in 1.8Gy fractions was administered to the whole pelvis 5 days/week over 5 weeks. A concomitant boost limited to the bladder tumor area plus margin or whole bladder of 22.5Gy in 1.5Gy fractions was administered from weeks 3×5. Thus, irradiation totalled 67.5Gy over 5 weeks. The interfraction interval was ≥6h/treatment day. We assessed prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), cause-specific survival (CSS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). RESULTS: Median follow-up was 46.2 months (range 4.7-155.7 months). Median overall survival was 27 months (95% CI:21-33 months). In this study, 146 (77.7%) patients had complete response, 39 (20.7%) had residual disease and 4 (1.6%) had progressive disease. The mean 3-, 5- and 10-year OS rates were respectively 41.2% (S.E.±0.036), 29% (S.E.±0.034), and 13.8% (S.E.±0.031). Significant prognostic factors for OS and CSS, by multivariate analysis, were tumor T-stage and urothelial obstruction. CONCLUSION: This CBRT protocol provided excellent results with a high complete response rate and good tolerance. This approach may therefore be particularly appropriate for elderly patients with invasive bladder cancer.