Weijian Zhou1, Jianping Liu2, Dongdong Mao3, Changying Hu4, Dianjun Gao1. 1. Department of Clinical Medicine, Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China. 2. Department of Urology, The First People's Hospital, Yibin, China. 3. Department of Urology, Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University, Weifang, China. 4. Department of Clinical Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College Nuclear Industry 416 Hospital, Chengdu, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This review and meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of equipment-assisted intravesical instillation of mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with nonmuscular invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). METHODS: The Embase, PubMed, CNKI, CBM, WANGFANG, VIP, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrial.com databases were searched for articles published before April 2022. The experimental group was treated with intravesical instillation of MMC assisted by equipment, including radiofrequency-induced thermochemotherapy, conductive thermochemical therapy, electromotive drug administration, or locoregional hyperthermia. The control group was treated with simple MMC perfusion. The outcomes of interest in the meta-analysis were recurrence, progression, side-effects, gross haematuria, and bladder irritation. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies that enrolled 1,190 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to that of the control group, device-assisted intravesical instillation of MMC significantly reduced both tumour recurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.24, 0.42], P <0.00001) and progression (OR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.12, 0.67], P = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of safety (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [0.66,2.21], P = 0.54), bladder irritation (OR = 1.06, 95% CI [0.72,1.55], P = 0.78), or gross haematuria (OR = 1.11, 95% CI [0.64,1.94], P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Equipment-assisted intravesical instillation of MMC significantly reduced the recurrence and progression of patients with NMIBC who underwent TURBT and improved their quality of life. Given the significant heterogeneity in research quality and sample size among earlier studies, more prospective, multicentre, large sample randomized controlled trials are needed to supplement and verify this in the future.
BACKGROUND: This review and meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of equipment-assisted intravesical instillation of mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with nonmuscular invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) after transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT). METHODS: The Embase, PubMed, CNKI, CBM, WANGFANG, VIP, Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrial.com databases were searched for articles published before April 2022. The experimental group was treated with intravesical instillation of MMC assisted by equipment, including radiofrequency-induced thermochemotherapy, conductive thermochemical therapy, electromotive drug administration, or locoregional hyperthermia. The control group was treated with simple MMC perfusion. The outcomes of interest in the meta-analysis were recurrence, progression, side-effects, gross haematuria, and bladder irritation. RESULTS: A total of 15 studies that enrolled 1,190 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Compared to that of the control group, device-assisted intravesical instillation of MMC significantly reduced both tumour recurrence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] [0.24, 0.42], P <0.00001) and progression (OR = 0.29, 95% CI [0.12, 0.67], P = 0.004). There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of safety (OR = 1.21, 95% CI [0.66,2.21], P = 0.54), bladder irritation (OR = 1.06, 95% CI [0.72,1.55], P = 0.78), or gross haematuria (OR = 1.11, 95% CI [0.64,1.94], P = 0.72). CONCLUSIONS: Equipment-assisted intravesical instillation of MMC significantly reduced the recurrence and progression of patients with NMIBC who underwent TURBT and improved their quality of life. Given the significant heterogeneity in research quality and sample size among earlier studies, more prospective, multicentre, large sample randomized controlled trials are needed to supplement and verify this in the future.
Authors: Savino M Di Stasi; Marco Valenti; Cristian Verri; Emanuele Liberati; Arcangelo Giurioli; Gioia Leprini; Francesco Masedu; Antonio R Ricci; Francesco Micali; Giuseppe Vespasiani Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2011-08-08 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Brian Hutton; Georgia Salanti; Deborah M Caldwell; Anna Chaimani; Christopher H Schmid; Chris Cameron; John P A Ioannidis; Sharon Straus; Kristian Thorlund; Jeroen P Jansen; Cynthia Mulrow; Ferrán Catalá-López; Peter C Gøtzsche; Kay Dickersin; Isabelle Boutron; Douglas G Altman; David Moher Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2015-06-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Dickon Hayne; Martin Stockler; Steve P McCombie; Venu Chalasani; Anne Long; Andrew Martin; Shomik Sengupta; Ian D Davis Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2015-05-27 Impact factor: 4.430