Literature DB >> 25958209

The incidence of radiographic aseptic loosening of the humeral component in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.

Gregory Gilot1, Andres M Alvarez-Pinzon2, Thomas W Wright3, Pierre-Henri Flurin4, Michael Krill1, Howard D Routman5, Joseph D Zuckerman6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has been used in the treatment of complex shoulder problems. The incidence of aseptic loosening of the humeral component has not been previously reported.
METHODS: This is a multicenter, retrospective, blinded, case-control radiographic review of 292 patients to determine the rate of humeral stem loosening. There were 177 cemented and 115 press-fit humeral components. Radiographs were critiqued for radiolucent lines adjacent to the humeral stem based on the method described by Gruen et al.
RESULTS: The overall rate of loosening was 0.74%. No radiographic loosening occurred in the press-fit group (115 stems). In the cemented group (177 stems), 2 shoulders (1.18%) were identified with radiographically loose stems. No loosening occurred in the press-fit group. No statistically significant difference was found in humeral stem loosening when the press-fit group and the cemented group were compared (P = .198). DISCUSSION: Our study indicates the cemented or press-fit RTSA system will result in a low incidence of radiolucent lines and radiographic loosening. Compared with historical survivorship of conventional anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty, RTSA shows a lower rate of radiographic stem loosening at a mean of 38.46 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The RTSA has a low incidence of humeral stem loosening at midterm. These results underscore the importance of careful selection of patients to provide the benefits of this surgical technique. Press-fit fixation may provide a lower risk to stem loosening.
Copyright © 2015 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; failed shoulder replacement; humeral fixation; radiographic stem loosening; satisfactory outcome

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25958209     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.02.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  12 in total

1.  Value comparison of humeral component press-fit and cemented techniques in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Derek D Berglund; Dragomir Mijic; Tsun Yee Law; Jennifer Kurowicki; Samuel Rosas; Jonathan C Levy
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.

Authors:  Jonathan C Levy; Derek Berglund; Rushabh Vakharia; Paul DeVito; Dimitri S Tahal; Dragomir Mijc; Bijan Ameri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Management of painful reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Anders L Ekelund
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2017-04-09

4.  Validation of a new classification for periprosthetic shoulder fractures.

Authors:  Chlodwig Kirchhoff; Marc Beirer; Ulrich Brunner; Arne Buchholz; Peter Biberthaler; Moritz Crönlein
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-01-20       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture in the elderly. Cemented or uncemented stem?

Authors:  Yaiza Lopiz; Carlos García-Fernandez; María Vallejo-Carrasco; Daniel Garriguez-Pérez; Loreto Achaerandio; Carmen Tesoro-Gonzalo; Fernando Marco
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-01-16       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  What Is the Survival and Function of Modular Reverse Total Shoulder Prostheses in Patients Undergoing Tumor Resections in Whom an Innervated Deltoid Muscle Can Be Preserved?

Authors:  Giulia Trovarelli; Alessandro Cappellari; Andrea Angelini; Elisa Pala; Pietro Ruggieri
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Delta Xtend reverse shoulder arthroplasty - Results at a minimum of five years.

Authors:  Craig M Ball
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2019-03-06

Review 8.  The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Authors:  Sarav S Shah; Benjamin T Gaal; Alexander M Roche; Surena Namdari; Brian M Grawe; Macy Lawler; Stewart Dalton; Joseph J King; Joshua Helmkamp; Grant E Garrigues; Thomas W Wright; Bradley S Schoch; Kyle Flik; Randall J Otto; Richard Jones; Andrew Jawa; Peter McCann; Joseph Abboud; Gabe Horneff; Glen Ross; Richard Friedman; Eric T Ricchetti; Douglas Boardman; Robert Z Tashjian; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-09-07

9.  Humeral-sided Radiographic Changes Following Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Tyler J Brolin; Ryan M Cox; John G Horneff Iii; Surena Namdari; Joseph A Abboud; Kristen Nicholson; Matthew L Ramsey
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2020-01

Review 10.  Management of Painful Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Chiara Fossati; Marianna Vitale; Tommaso Forin Valvecchi; Roberta Gualtierotti; Pietro S Randelli
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2020-07-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.