Literature DB >> 33795858

Detecting and modelling real percolation and phase transitions of information on social media.

Jiarong Xie1, Fanhui Meng1, Jiachen Sun1, Xiao Ma1, Gang Yan2,3, Yanqing Hu4,5.   

Abstract

It is widely believed that information spread on social media is a percolation process, with parallels to phase transitions in theoretical physics. However, evidence for this hypothesis is limited, as phase transitions have not been directly observed in any social media. Here, through an analysis of 100 million Weibo and 40 million Twitter users, we identify percolation-like spread and find that it happens more readily than current theoretical models would predict. The lower percolation threshold can be explained by the existence of positive feedback in the coevolution between network structure and user activity level, such that more-active users gain more followers. Moreover, this coevolution induces an extreme imbalance in users' influence. Our findings indicate that the ability of information to spread across social networks is higher than expected, with implications for many information-spread problems.

Year:  2021        PMID: 33795858     DOI: 10.1038/s41562-021-01090-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Hum Behav        ISSN: 2397-3374


  20 in total

1.  Spontaneous emergence of social influence in online systems.

Authors:  Jukka-Pekka Onnela; Felix Reed-Tsochas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-11       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The spreading of misinformation online.

Authors:  Michela Del Vicario; Alessandro Bessi; Fabiana Zollo; Fabio Petroni; Antonio Scala; Guido Caldarelli; H Eugene Stanley; Walter Quattrociocchi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.

Authors:  Eytan Bakshy; Solomon Messing; Lada A Adamic
Journal:  Science       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Understanding the spreading patterns of mobile phone viruses.

Authors:  Pu Wang; Marta C González; César A Hidalgo; Albert-László Barabási
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Social media and the science of health behavior.

Authors:  Damon Centola
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  The impact of social media on children, adolescents, and families.

Authors:  Gwenn Schurgin O'Keeffe; Kathleen Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 7.124

7.  Big data. The parable of Google Flu: traps in big data analysis.

Authors:  David Lazer; Ryan Kennedy; Gary King; Alessandro Vespignani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The spread of true and false news online.

Authors:  Soroush Vosoughi; Deb Roy; Sinan Aral
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  A survey of cimetidine prescribing.

Authors:  A E Cocco; D V Cocco
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Social science. Computational social science.

Authors:  David Lazer; Alex Pentland; Lada Adamic; Sinan Aral; Albert-Laszlo Barabasi; Devon Brewer; Nicholas Christakis; Noshir Contractor; James Fowler; Myron Gutmann; Tony Jebara; Gary King; Michael Macy; Deb Roy; Marshall Van Alstyne
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  1 in total

1.  Indirect influence in social networks as an induced percolation phenomenon.

Authors:  Jiarong Xie; Xiangrong Wang; Ling Feng; Jin-Hua Zhao; Wenyuan Liu; Yamir Moreno; Yanqing Hu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 12.779

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.