Literature DB >> 25952546

Practical approach to subject-specific estimation of knee joint contact force.

Brian A Knarr1, Jill S Higginson2.   

Abstract

Compressive forces experienced at the knee can significantly contribute to cartilage degeneration. Musculoskeletal models enable predictions of the internal forces experienced at the knee, but validation is often not possible, as experimental data detailing loading at the knee joint is limited. Recently available data reporting compressive knee force through direct measurement using instrumented total knee replacements offer a unique opportunity to evaluate the accuracy of models. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of subject-specificity in increasing the accuracy of model predictions; however, these techniques may be unrealistic outside of a research setting. Therefore, the goal of our work was to identify a practical approach for accurate prediction of tibiofemoral knee contact force (KCF). Four methods for prediction of knee contact force were compared: (1) standard static optimization, (2) uniform muscle coordination weighting, (3) subject-specific muscle coordination weighting and (4) subject-specific strength adjustments. Walking trials for three subjects with instrumented knee replacements were used to evaluate the accuracy of model predictions. Predictions utilizing subject-specific muscle coordination weighting yielded the best agreement with experimental data; however this method required in vivo data for weighting factor calibration. Including subject-specific strength adjustments improved models' predictions compared to standard static optimization, with errors in peak KCF less than 0.5 body weight for all subjects. Overall, combining clinical assessments of muscle strength with standard tools available in the OpenSim software package, such as inverse kinematics and static optimization, appears to be a practical method for predicting joint contact force that can be implemented for many applications.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Contact force; Knee; Modeling; Osteoarthritis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25952546      PMCID: PMC4536092          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  20 in total

1.  Grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  Quadriceps weakness in knee osteoarthritis: the effect on pain and disability.

Authors:  S C O'Reilly; A Jones; K R Muir; M Doherty
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 19.103

3.  An electromyogram-driven musculoskeletal model of the knee to predict in vivo joint contact forces during normal and novel gait patterns.

Authors:  Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Dual-joint modeling for estimation of total knee replacement contact forces during locomotion.

Authors:  Michael W Hast; Stephen J Piazza
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Compressive tibiofemoral force during crouch gait.

Authors:  Katherine M Steele; Matthew S Demers; Michael H Schwartz; Scott L Delp
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-12-27       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Understanding compensatory strategies for muscle weakness during gait by simulating activation deficits seen post-stroke.

Authors:  Brian A Knarr; Darcy S Reisman; Stuart A Binder-Macleod; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Subject-specific knee joint geometry improves predictions of medial tibiofemoral contact forces.

Authors:  Pauline Gerus; Massimo Sartori; Thor F Besier; Benjamin J Fregly; Scott L Delp; Scott A Banks; Marcus G Pandy; Darryl D D'Lima; David G Lloyd
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Update on grand challenge competition to predict in vivo knee loads.

Authors:  Allison L Kinney; Thor F Besier; Darryl D D'Lima; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Are external knee load and EMG measures accurate indicators of internal knee contact forces during gait?

Authors:  Andrew J Meyer; Darryl D D'Lima; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Clifford W Colwell; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2012-12-31       Impact factor: 3.494

10.  Changes in predicted muscle coordination with subject-specific muscle parameters for individuals after stroke.

Authors:  Brian A Knarr; Darcy S Reisman; Stuart A Binder-Macleod; Jill S Higginson
Journal:  Stroke Res Treat       Date:  2014-06-25
View more
  3 in total

1.  Incorporation of CT-based measurements of trunk anatomy into subject-specific musculoskeletal models of the spine influences vertebral loading predictions.

Authors:  Alexander G Bruno; Hossein Mokhtarzadeh; Brett T Allaire; Kelsey R Velie; M Clara De Paolis Kaluza; Dennis E Anderson; Mary L Bouxsein
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 3.494

2.  An Approach to Developing Customized Total Knee Replacement Implants.

Authors:  Xinyu Li; Changjiang Wang; Yuan Guo; Weiyi Chen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 2.682

3.  Foot Pronation Contributes to Altered Lower Extremity Loading After Long Distance Running.

Authors:  Qichang Mei; Yaodong Gu; Liangliang Xiang; Julien S Baker; Justin Fernandez
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.566

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.