Literature DB >> 23445059

An electromyogram-driven musculoskeletal model of the knee to predict in vivo joint contact forces during normal and novel gait patterns.

Kurt Manal1, Thomas S Buchanan.   

Abstract

Computational models that predict internal joint forces have the potential to enhance our understanding of normal and pathological movement. Validation studies of modeling results are necessary if such models are to be adopted by clinicians to complement patient treatment and rehabilitation. The purposes of this paper are: (1) to describe an electromyogram (EMG)-driven modeling approach to predict knee joint contact forces, and (2) to evaluate the accuracy of model predictions for two distinctly different gait patterns (normal walking and medial thrust gait) against known values for a patient with a force recording knee prosthesis. Blinded model predictions and revised model estimates for knee joint contact forces are reported for our entry in the 2012 Grand Challenge to predict in vivo knee loads. The EMG-driven model correctly predicted that medial compartment contact force for the medial thrust gait increased despite the decrease in knee adduction moment. Model accuracy was high: the difference in peak loading was less than 0.01 bodyweight (BW) with an R(2 )= 0.92. The model also predicted lateral loading for the normal walking trial with good accuracy exhibiting a peak loading difference of 0.04 BW and an R(2 )= 0.44. Overall, the EMG-driven model captured the general shape and timing of the contact force profiles and with accurate input data the model estimated joint contact forces with sufficient accuracy to enhance the interpretation of joint loading beyond what is possible from data obtained from standard motion capture studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23445059      PMCID: PMC3705826          DOI: 10.1115/1.4023457

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  20 in total

1.  Dynamic stability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee.

Authors:  K S Rudolph; M J Axe; T S Buchanan; J P Scholz; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Estimation of muscle forces and joint moments using a forward-inverse dynamics model.

Authors:  Thomas S Buchanan; David G Lloyd; Kurt Manal; Thor F Besier
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Knee adduction moment, serum hyaluronan level, and disease severity in medial tibiofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  L Sharma; D E Hurwitz; E J Thonar; J A Sum; M E Lenz; D D Dunlop; T J Schnitzer; G Kirwan-Mellis; T P Andriacchi
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  1998-07

Review 4.  The role of ambulatory mechanics in the initiation and progression of knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Thomas P Andriacchi; Annegret Mündermann
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Perturbation training improves knee kinematics and reduces muscle co-contraction after complete unilateral anterior cruciate ligament rupture.

Authors:  Terese L Chmielewski; Wendy J Hurd; Katherine S Rudolph; Michael J Axe; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2005-08

6.  Determination of muscle orientations and moment arms.

Authors:  K N An; K Takahashi; T P Harrigan; E Y Chao
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Individual muscle contributions to the axial knee joint contact force during normal walking.

Authors:  Kotaro Sasaki; Richard R Neptune
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  EMG-driven modeling approach to muscle force and joint load estimations: case study in knee osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Deepak Kumar; Katherine S Rudolph; Kurt T Manal
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-09-07       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Sensitivity of estimated muscle force in forward simulation of normal walking.

Authors:  Ming Xiao; Jill Higginson
Journal:  J Appl Biomech       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.833

Review 10.  The role of muscles in joint adaptation and degeneration.

Authors:  W Herzog; D Longino; A Clark
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-09-20       Impact factor: 3.445

View more
  39 in total

Review 1.  Osteoarthritis year in review 2015: mechanics.

Authors:  N H Varady; A J Grodzinsky
Journal:  Osteoarthritis Cartilage       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 6.576

2.  Prediction of In Vivo Knee Joint Loads Using a Global Probabilistic Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandro Navacchia; Casey A Myers; Paul J Rullkoetter; Kevin B Shelburne
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  The Influence of Component Alignment and Ligament Properties on Tibiofemoral Contact Forces in Total Knee Replacement.

Authors:  Colin R Smith; Michael F Vignos; Rachel L Lenhart; Jarred Kaiser; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  Courses of change in knee adduction moment and lateral thrust differ up to 1 year after TKA.

Authors:  Noboru Shimada; Masataka Deie; Kazuhiko Hirata; Yasuhiko Hiate; Naoya Orita; Daisuke Iwaki; Yoshihiro Ito; Hiroaki Kimura; Evangelos Pappas; Mitsuo Ochi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  High muscle co-contraction does not result in high joint forces during gait in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees.

Authors:  Ashutosh Khandha; Kurt Manal; Jacob Capin; Elizabeth Wellsandt; Adam Marmon; Lynn Snyder-Mackler; Thomas S Buchanan
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 3.494

6.  Muscle synergies may improve optimization prediction of knee contact forces during walking.

Authors:  Jonathan P Walter; Allison L Kinney; Scott A Banks; Darryl D D'Lima; Thor F Besier; David G Lloyd; Benjamin J Fregly
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Knee contact force asymmetries in patients who failed return-to-sport readiness criteria 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Emily S Gardinier; Stephanie Di Stasi; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.202

8.  Gait mechanics and second ACL rupture: Implications for delaying return-to-sport.

Authors:  Jacob J Capin; Ashutosh Khandha; Ryan Zarzycki; Kurt Manal; Thomas S Buchanan; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  Electromyography-Driven Forward Dynamics Simulation to Estimate In Vivo Joint Contact Forces During Normal, Smooth, and Bouncy Gaits.

Authors:  Swithin S Razu; Trent M Guess
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 2.097

10.  Biofeedback for Gait Retraining Based on Real-Time Estimation of Tibiofemoral Joint Contact Forces.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; Monica Reggiani; David J Saxby; Elena Ceseracciu; Luca Modenese; David G Lloyd
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 3.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.