Literature DB >> 25951749

A causal test of the motor theory of speech perception: a case of impaired speech production and spared speech perception.

Alena Stasenko1, Cory Bonn, Alex Teghipco, Frank E Garcea, Catherine Sweet, Mary Dombovy, Joyce McDonough, Bradford Z Mahon.   

Abstract

The debate about the causal role of the motor system in speech perception has been reignited by demonstrations that motor processes are engaged during the processing of speech sounds. Here, we evaluate which aspects of auditory speech processing are affected, and which are not, in a stroke patient with dysfunction of the speech motor system. We found that the patient showed a normal phonemic categorical boundary when discriminating two non-words that differ by a minimal pair (e.g., ADA-AGA). However, using the same stimuli, the patient was unable to identify or label the non-word stimuli (using a button-press response). A control task showed that he could identify speech sounds by speaker gender, ruling out a general labelling impairment. These data suggest that while the motor system is not causally involved in perception of the speech signal, it may be used when other cues (e.g., meaning, context) are not available.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apraxia of speech; categorical perception; mirror neurons; motor theory of speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25951749      PMCID: PMC4454743          DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2015.1035702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  62 in total

1.  Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences.

Authors:  J R Crawford; Paul H Garthwaite
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries.

Authors:  A M LIBERMAN; K S HARRIS; H S HOFFMAN; B C GRIFFITH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1957-11

Review 3.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

4.  Spatiotemporal visualization of the tongue surface using ultrasound and Kriging (SURFACES).

Authors:  Vijay Parthasarathy; Maureen Stone; Jerry L Prince
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2005 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.346

Review 5.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

6.  The essential role of premotor cortex in speech perception.

Authors:  Ingo G Meister; Stephen M Wilson; Choi Deblieck; Allan D Wu; Marco Iacoboni
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Ventral and dorsal pathways for language.

Authors:  Dorothee Saur; Björn W Kreher; Susanne Schnell; Dorothee Kümmerer; Philipp Kellmeyer; Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Roza Umarova; Mariacristina Musso; Volkmar Glauche; Stefanie Abel; Walter Huber; Michel Rijntjes; Jürgen Hennig; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The motor theory of speech perception revisited.

Authors:  Dominic W Massaro; Trevor H Chen
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-04

9.  The psychophysics of categorical perception.

Authors:  N A Macmillan; H L Kaplan; C D Creelman
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 10.  Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Markus Kiefer; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2011-04-30       Impact factor: 4.027

View more
  4 in total

1.  No evidence of somatotopic place of articulation feature mapping in motor cortex during passive speech perception.

Authors:  Jessica S Arsenault; Bradley R Buchsbaum
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 2.  Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond.

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

3.  The visual speech head start improves perception and reduces superior temporal cortex responses to auditory speech.

Authors:  Patrick J Karas; John F Magnotti; Brian A Metzger; Lin L Zhu; Kristen B Smith; Daniel Yoshor; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  What Happened to Mirror Neurons?

Authors:  Cecilia Heyes; Caroline Catmur
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-07-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.