Literature DB >> 26715582

No evidence of somatotopic place of articulation feature mapping in motor cortex during passive speech perception.

Jessica S Arsenault1,2, Bradley R Buchsbaum3,4.   

Abstract

The motor theory of speech perception has experienced a recent revival due to a number of studies implicating the motor system during speech perception. In a key study, Pulvermüller et al. (2006) showed that premotor/motor cortex differentially responds to the passive auditory perception of lip and tongue speech sounds. However, no study has yet attempted to replicate this important finding from nearly a decade ago. The objective of the current study was to replicate the principal finding of Pulvermüller et al. (2006) and generalize it to a larger set of speech tokens while applying a more powerful statistical approach using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA). Participants performed an articulatory localizer as well as a speech perception task where they passively listened to a set of eight syllables while undergoing fMRI. Both univariate and multivariate analyses failed to find evidence for somatotopic coding in motor or premotor cortex during speech perception. Positive evidence for the null hypothesis was further confirmed by Bayesian analyses. Results consistently show that while the lip and tongue areas of the motor cortex are sensitive to movements of the articulators, they do not appear to preferentially respond to labial and alveolar speech sounds during passive speech perception.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MVPA; Motor cortex; Place of articulation; Speech perception; fMRI

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26715582     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0988-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  31 in total

1.  Beyond mind-reading: multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data.

Authors:  Kenneth A Norman; Sean M Polyn; Greg J Detre; James V Haxby
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 2.  The motor theory of speech perception reviewed.

Authors:  Bruno Galantucci; Carol A Fowler; M T Turvey
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

3.  The selective role of premotor cortex in speech perception: a contribution to phoneme judgements but not speech comprehension.

Authors:  Katya Krieger-Redwood; M Gareth Gaskell; Shane Lindsay; Elizabeth Jefferies
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Distributed Patterns of Reactivation Predict Vividness of Recollection.

Authors:  Marie St-Laurent; Hervé Abdi; Bradley R Buchsbaum
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  Automatic phoneme category selectivity in the dorsal auditory stream.

Authors:  Mark A Chevillet; Xiong Jiang; Josef P Rauschecker; Maximilian Riesenhuber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  The motor theory of speech perception revised.

Authors:  A M Liberman; I G Mattingly
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1985-10

Review 7.  A little more conversation, a little less action--candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception.

Authors:  Sophie K Scott; Carolyn McGettigan; Frank Eisner
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 34.870

8.  An Investigation of Place and Voice Features Using fMRI-Adaptation.

Authors:  Laurel Lawyer; David Corina
Journal:  J Neurolinguistics       Date:  2014-01-01       Impact factor: 1.710

9.  Decoding Articulatory Features from fMRI Responses in Dorsal Speech Regions.

Authors:  Joao M Correia; Bernadette M B Jansma; Milene Bonte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Attention fine-tunes auditory-motor processing of speech sounds.

Authors:  Riikka Möttönen; Gido M van de Ven; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  12 in total

1.  Vision perceptually restores auditory spectral dynamics in speech.

Authors:  John Plass; David Brang; Satoru Suzuki; Marcia Grabowecky
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  The Potential for a Speech Brain-Computer Interface Using Chronic Electrocorticography.

Authors:  Qinwan Rabbani; Griffin Milsap; Nathan E Crone
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.620

3.  Touching lips and hearing fingers: effector-specific congruency between tactile and auditory stimulation modulates N1 amplitude and alpha desynchronization.

Authors:  Guannan Shen; Andrew N Meltzoff; Peter J Marshall
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Neural Representation of Articulable and Inarticulable Novel Sound Contrasts: The Role of the Dorsal Stream.

Authors:  David I Saltzman; Emily B Myers
Journal:  Neurobiol Lang (Camb)       Date:  2020-08

5.  Task-General and Acoustic-Invariant Neural Representation of Speech Categories in the Human Brain.

Authors:  Gangyi Feng; Zhenzhong Gan; Suiping Wang; Patrick C M Wong; Bharath Chandrasekaran
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Speech-Driven Spectrotemporal Receptive Fields Beyond the Auditory Cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan H Venezia; Virginia M Richards; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 3.672

7.  The motor system's [modest] contribution to speech perception.

Authors:  Ryan C Stokes; Jonathan H Venezia; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-08

Review 8.  Is the Sensorimotor Cortex Relevant for Speech Perception and Understanding? An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Malte R Schomers; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  What Has Replication Ever Done for Us? Insights from Neuroimaging of Speech Perception.

Authors:  Samuel Evans
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Processing of Action and Sound Verbs in Context: An FMRI Study.

Authors:  Margot Popp; Natalie M Trumpp; Markus Kiefer
Journal:  Transl Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 1.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.