Literature DB >> 21621764

Conceptual representations in mind and brain: theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions.

Markus Kiefer1, Friedemann Pulvermüller.   

Abstract

Conceptual representations in long-term memory crucially contribute to perception and action, language and thought. However, the precise nature of these conceptual memory traces is discussed controversially. In particular, the grounding of concepts in the sensory and motor brain systems is the focus of a current debate. Here, we review theoretical accounts of the structure and neural basis of conceptual memory and evaluate them in light of recent empirical evidence. Models of conceptual processing can be distinguished along four dimensions: (i) amodal versus modality-specific, (ii) localist versus distributed, (iii) innate versus experience-dependent, and (iv) stable versus flexible. A systematic review of behavioral and neuroimaging studies in healthy participants along with brain-damaged patients will then be used to evaluate the competing theoretical approaches to conceptual representations. These findings indicate that concepts are flexible, distributed representations comprised of modality-specific conceptual features. Conceptual features are stored in distinct sensory and motor brain areas depending on specific sensory and motor experiences during concept acquisition. Three important controversial issues are highlighted, which require further clarification in future research: the existence of an amodal conceptual representation in the anterior temporal lobe, the causal role of sensory and motor activation for conceptual processing and the grounding of abstract concepts in perception and action. We argue that an embodiment view of conceptual representations realized as distributed sensory and motor cell assemblies that are complemented by supramodal integration brain circuits may serve as a theoretical framework to guide future research on concrete and abstract concepts.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21621764     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  160 in total

1.  Sensitivity and salience of form-function correlations of objects: evidence from feature tasks.

Authors:  J Frederico Marques; Mafalda M Mendes; Ana Raposo
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

2.  Concept Representation Reflects Multimodal Abstraction: A Framework for Embodied Semantics.

Authors:  Leonardo Fernandino; Jeffrey R Binder; Rutvik H Desai; Suzanne L Pendl; Colin J Humphries; William L Gross; Lisa L Conant; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Understanding of action-related and abstract verbs in comparison: a behavioral and TMS study.

Authors:  Alessandro Innocenti; Elisa De Stefani; Mariateresa Sestito; Maurizio Gentilucci
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2013-10-11

4.  Monitoring the growth of the neural representations of new animal concepts.

Authors:  Andrew James Bauer; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 5.  Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition.

Authors:  Guy Dove
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-08

Review 6.  Disrupted development and imbalanced function in the global neuronal workspace: a positive-feedback mechanism for the emergence of ASD in early infancy.

Authors:  Chris Fields; James F Glazebrook
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2016-11-15       Impact factor: 5.082

Review 7.  The multifaceted abstract brain.

Authors:  Rutvik H Desai; Megan Reilly; Wessel van Dam
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  What is embodied about cognition?

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Brain reading and behavioral methods provide complementary perspectives on the representation of concepts.

Authors:  Andrew James Bauer; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Feature diagnosticity affects representations of novel and familiar objects.

Authors:  Nina S Hsu; Margaret L Schlichting; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.