| Literature DB >> 25950765 |
Salla Välimäki1, Joona Mikkilä2, Ville Liljeström3,4, Henna Rosilo4, Ari Ora5,6, Mauri A Kostiainen7.
Abstract
Synthetic macromolecules that can bind and co-assemble with proteins are important for the future development of biohybrid materials. Active systems are further required to create materials that can respond and change their behavior in response to external stimuli. Here we report that stimuli-responsive linear-branched diblock copolymers consisting of a cationic multivalent dendron with a linear thermoresponsive polymer tail at the focal point, can bind and complex Pyrococcus furiosus ferritin protein cages into crystalline arrays. The multivalent dendron structure utilizes cationic spermine units to bind electrostatically on the surface of the negatively charged ferritin cage and the in situ polymerized poly(di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate) linear block enables control with temperature. Cloud point of the final product was determined with dynamic light scattering (DLS), and it was shown to be approximately 31 °C at a concentration of 150 mg/L. Complexation of the polymer binder and apoferritin was studied with DLS, small-angle X-ray scattering, and transmission electron microscopy, which showed the presence of crystalline arrays of ferritin cages with a face-centered cubic (fcc, Fm3m)) Bravais lattice where lattice parameter a=18.6 nm. The complexation process was not temperature dependent but the final complexes had thermoresponsive characteristics with negative thermal expansion.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25950765 PMCID: PMC4463641 DOI: 10.3390/ijms160510201
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Synthesis of the stimuli-responsive linear-branched diblock copolymer (4). The branched part consists of a cationic multivalent dendron with a trifurcated Newkome-type frame and spermine (red) functionalized surface. The linear thermoresponsive polymer tail (poly(di(ethylene glycol) methyl ether methacrylate)) (blue) at the focal point is polymerized in situ using atom-transfer radical polymerization.
Figure 2(a) Z-average diameter and derived count rate for 4 (150 mg/L) as a function of temperature; (b) Reversible thermal switching of size by cycling temperature between 18 and 50 °C; (c,d) Titration of aFT with 4 below (18 °C) and above (50 °C) Tcp followed by the scattering from free aFT (c) and formation of large secondary assemblies (d,e). Volume-average size-distribution measured from free aFT (100 mg/L) and aFT-4 (16 mg/L) complexes; and (f) the corresponding second-order autocorrelation curves.
Figure 3(a) Azimuthally integrated SAXS profiles for aFT-4 complexes measured at 20 and 50 °C. Dotted vertical lines indicate the calculated peak positions for a fcc structure with a = 18.55 nm; (b) 2D scattering profile of the 20 °C sample; (c) Comparison between the (220) and (311) peak positions measured at different temperatures highlights the change in lattice constant; (d) Quadratic Miller indices of assigned reflections for fcc structure versus measured q-vector positions for indexed peaks. Lines present linear fits, which yield lattice parameters 18.55 and 18.18 nm at 20 and 50 °C, respectively; (e) Face-centered cubic (fcc) unit cell (yellow) of aFT particles (red) drawn to scale; and (f) unit cell with aFT diameter reduced for clarity (top) and unit cell with top 5 aFT removed.
Figure 4Negatively stained (uranyl acetate) TEM images of: (a) Free aFT particles (b) aFT-4 complexes in the absence of NaCl are large and amorphous; (c) aFT-4 complexes prepared in the presence of 10 mM NaCl show large crystalline domains; (d–g) Crystalline assemblies viewed along different projection axes; and (h) fcc unit cell viewed along the [111] zone axis. Scale bars are 50 nm in all images.