| Literature DB >> 25950663 |
Alex R Jones1, Julius Rentergent2, Nigel S Scrutton2, Sam Hay3.
Abstract
Coenzyme B12 -dependent enzymes such as ethanolamine ammonia lyase have remarkable catalytic power and some unique properties that enable detailed analysis of the reaction chemistry and associated dynamics. By selectively deuterating the substrate (ethanolamine) and/or the β-carbon of the 5'-deoxyadenosyl moiety of the intrinsic coenzyme B12 , it was possible to experimentally probe both the forward and reverse hydrogen atom transfers between the 5'-deoxyadenosyl radical and substrate during single-turnover stopped-flow measurements. These data are interpreted within the context of a kinetic model where the 5'-deoxyadenosyl radical intermediate may be quasi-stable and rearrangement of the substrate radical is essentially irreversible. Global fitting of these data allows estimation of the intrinsic rate constants associated with CoC homolysis and initial H-abstraction steps. In contrast to previous stopped-flow studies, the apparent kinetic isotope effects are found to be relatively small.Entities:
Keywords: coenzyme B12; enzymes; ethanolamine ammonia lyase; kinetic isotope effects; reaction mechanisms
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25950663 PMCID: PMC4497352 DOI: 10.1002/chem.201500958
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chemistry ISSN: 0947-6539 Impact factor: 5.236
Figure 1Averaged stopped-flow transients showing the change in EAL or [D2]EAL absorbance at 525 nm upon mixing with saturating concentrations of EA or [D4]EA (0.5 mM post-mixing) at 277 K. The vertical dotted line indicates the stopped-flow dead-time of about 1.5 ms and only data collected at ≥1.5 ms were used for fitting to a double exponential function (dotted lines). Fitting parameters are given in Table 1.
Observed rate constants obtained from the fitted data in Figure 1.[a]
| E, S | 2H species | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| H,H | – | 236.1±11.9 | 4.0±1.1 | 0.94 |
| H,D | [D4]EA | 87.2±3.6 | 5.1±0.2 | 0.70 |
| D,H | [D2]EAL | 191.9±5.2 | 5.7±1.4 | 0.93 |
| D,D | [D2]EAL, [D4]EA | 48.2±4.4 | 6.1±3.8 | 0.88 |
Averaged transients are presented in Figure 1. Individual transients (typically ca. 10) were each fitted to a double exponential function with the averages ±1 standard deviation of rate constants presented here.
The deuteration state of the 5′-deoxyadenosyl Cβ (E) and the substrate (S).
The relative fraction of the amplitude of kobs1, that is, A1/(A1+A2).
Observed KIEs on kobs1 values from Table 1.
| E,S/E,S | KIEobs1 |
|---|---|
| H,H/H,D | 2.71±0.18 |
| H,H/D,H | 1.23±0.08 |
| H,H/D,D | 4.90±0.51 |
| D,H/D,D | 3.98±0.40 |
| H,D/D,D | 1.81±0.18 |
| (H,D/D,D)/(H,H/D,H) | 1.47±0.24 |
The same nomenclature as Table 1 is used, for example, H,H/H,D is the substrate 1° KIE.
Figure 2Proton inventory-style stopped-flow experiment performed by mixing [D2]EAL with various mixtures of EA and [D4]EA (0.5 mM total post-mixing concentration) at 277 K. The transients are fitted to a double-exponential function (dotted lines) and the arrow shows the direction of increasing n, the mole fraction of [D4]EA. The observed KIE on kobs1 (inset) versus fraction of deuterated EA (n) fitted to a linear (solid line) and quadratic (dashed line) equation. Rate constants and KIEs are given in Table S1 in the Supporting Information.
Global fitting parameters from Figure 3.[a]
| 2-step | 3-step | |
|---|---|---|
| – | 562±61 | |
| – | 582±83 | |
| 208.8±1.4[b] | 497±68 | |
| 19.6±0.9 | 45.0±4.7 | |
| 16.9±1.7 | 24.3±2.6 | |
| 11.2±0.3 | 11.0±0.3 | |
| 12.2±0.4 | 10.3±0.4 | |
| KIE2[c] | 3.9±0.1 | 4.6±0.2 |
| KIE−2 | 2.2±0.3 | 3.7±0.4 |
| KIE′−2[d] | 39.4±6.1 | 37.5±5.2 |
[a] Full fitting parameters for the 2-step and 3-step models are given in Table S2 in the Supporting Information. [b] All rates constants in s−1. [c] This KIE is shared between the k2 and k′2 rate constants. [d] This KIE is not likely to be intrinsic. See the text for more details.
Figure 3Global fitting of the resampled data taken from Figures 1 and 2 to the 3-step mechanism described in Scheme 2. Fitting parameters are given in Table 3 and Table S2 in the Supporting Information and more detail is given in the Experimental Section.
Figure 4Apparent evolution of the 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical concentration modelled from the best-fit parameters for the 3-step model fitting in Figure 3. Transients are for: A) EA versus EAL, B) [D4]EA versus [D2]EAL, C) [D4]EA versus EAL, and D) EA versus [D2]EAL. In C and D the black transients are convolutions of the contributions from the initial H or D abstraction (red) and the “scrambled” partially deuterated 5′-deoxyadenosyl radical (blue). The vertical dotted line indicates the stopped-flow dead-time of about 1.5 ms.