Literature DB >> 25948691

A conserved genetic mechanism specifies deutocerebral appendage identity in insects and arachnids.

Prashant P Sharma1, Oscar A Tarazona2, Davys H Lopez3, Evelyn E Schwager4, Martin J Cohn2, Ward C Wheeler5, Cassandra G Extavour6.   

Abstract

The segmental architecture of the arthropod head is one of the most controversial topics in the evolutionary developmental biology of arthropods. The deutocerebral (second) segment of the head is putatively homologous across Arthropoda, as inferred from the segmental distribution of the tripartite brain and the absence of Hox gene expression of this anterior-most, appendage-bearing segment. While this homology statement implies a putative common mechanism for differentiation of deutocerebral appendages across arthropods, experimental data for deutocerebral appendage fate specification are limited to winged insects. Mandibulates (hexapods, crustaceans and myriapods) bear a characteristic pair of antennae on the deutocerebral segment, whereas chelicerates (e.g. spiders, scorpions, harvestmen) bear the eponymous chelicerae. In such hexapods as the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, and the cricket, Gryllus bimaculatus, cephalic appendages are differentiated from the thoracic appendages (legs) by the activity of the appendage patterning gene homothorax (hth). Here we show that embryonic RNA interference against hth in the harvestman Phalangium opilio results in homeonotic chelicera-to-leg transformations, and also in some cases pedipalp-to-leg transformations. In more strongly affected embryos, adjacent appendages undergo fusion and/or truncation, and legs display proximal defects, suggesting conservation of additional functions of hth in patterning the antero-posterior and proximo-distal appendage axes. Expression signal of anterior Hox genes labial, proboscipedia and Deformed is diminished, but not absent, in hth RNAi embryos, consistent with results previously obtained with the insect G. bimaculatus. Our results substantiate a deep homology across arthropods of the mechanism whereby cephalic appendages are differentiated from locomotory appendages.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthropoda; antenna; chelicera; deutocerebrum; opiliones; serial homology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25948691      PMCID: PMC4455815          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2015.0698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  43 in total

1.  A palaeontological solution to the arthropod head problem.

Authors:  Graham E Budd
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-05-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Hox genes and the evolution of the arthropod body plan.

Authors:  Cynthia L Hughes; Thomas C Kaufman
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

3.  Spatial and temporal regulation of the homeotic selector gene Antennapedia is required for the establishment of leg identity in Drosophila.

Authors:  B Starling Emerald; Stephen M Cohen
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 3.582

4.  Evolution of the chelicera: a dachshund domain is retained in the deutocerebral appendage of Opiliones (Arthropoda, Chelicerata).

Authors:  Prashant P Sharma; Evelyn E Schwager; Cassandra G Extavour; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Evol Dev       Date:  2012 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Phylogenomic interrogation of arachnida reveals systemic conflicts in phylogenetic signal.

Authors:  Prashant P Sharma; Stefan T Kaluziak; Alicia R Pérez-Porro; Vanessa L González; Gustavo Hormiga; Ward C Wheeler; Gonzalo Giribet
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-08-08       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  The control of trunk Hox specificity and activity by Extradenticle.

Authors:  H D Ryoo; R S Mann
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

7.  A common mechanism for antenna-to-Leg transformation in Drosophila: suppression of homothorax transcription by four HOM-C genes.

Authors:  L C Yao; G J Liaw; C Y Pai; Y H Sun
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  1999-07-15       Impact factor: 3.582

8.  Antenna and all gnathal appendages are similarly transformed by homothorax knock-down in the cricket Gryllus bimaculatus.

Authors:  Monica Ronco; Tomohiro Uda; Taro Mito; Alessandro Minelli; Sumihare Noji; Martin Klingler
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.582

9.  Functional analyses in the hemipteran Oncopeltus fasciatus reveal conserved and derived aspects of appendage patterning in insects.

Authors:  David R Angelini; Thomas C Kaufman
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 3.582

10.  Onychophoran Hox genes and the evolution of arthropod Hox gene expression.

Authors:  Ralf Janssen; Bo Joakim Eriksson; Noel N Tait; Graham E Budd
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2014-03-05       Impact factor: 3.172

View more
  9 in total

1.  Loss of intermediate regions of perpendicular body axes contributed to miniaturization of tardigrades.

Authors:  Mandy Game; Frank W Smith
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Developmental gene expression as a phylogenetic data class: support for the monophyly of Arachnopulmonata.

Authors:  Erik D Nolan; Carlos E Santibáñez-López; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Genomic resources and toolkits for developmental study of whip spiders (Amblypygi) provide insights into arachnid genome evolution and antenniform leg patterning.

Authors:  Guilherme Gainett; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 2.250

4.  Cooption of an appendage-patterning gene cassette in the head segmentation of arachnids.

Authors:  Emily V W Setton; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-03-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  Implications of a cheliceral axial duplication in Tetragnatha versicolor (Araneae: Tetragnathidae) for arachnid deuterocerebral appendage development.

Authors:  Darko D Cotoras; Pedro de S Castanheira; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  Blastoderm segmentation in Oncopeltus fasciatus and the evolution of insect segmentation mechanisms.

Authors:  Reut Stahi; Ariel D Chipman
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Systemic paralogy and function of retinal determination network homologs in arachnids.

Authors:  Guilherme Gainett; Jesús A Ballesteros; Charlotte R Kanzler; Jakob T Zehms; John M Zern; Shlomi Aharon; Efrat Gavish-Regev; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Eggs to long-legs: embryonic staging of the harvestman Phalangium opilio (Opiliones), an emerging model arachnid.

Authors:  Guilherme Gainett; Audrey R Crawford; Benjamin C Klementz; Calvin So; Caitlin M Baker; Emily V W Setton; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  The pattern of a specimen of Pycnogonum litorale (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) with a supernumerary leg can be explained with the "boundary model" of appendage formation.

Authors:  Gerhard Scholtz; Georg Brenneis
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2016-01-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.